Trump is running for president again

185,821 Views | 2558 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by sycasey
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly, I think it's pretty likely that the economy is in decent shape by 2024.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

Anarchistbear said:

In this system you vote for someone or against someone. We've had six years of disastrous government so it's going to be against but Biden doesn't inspire the dislike Trump does which means the Dems will continue to spin their "our democracy is at stake from fascists " fantasies because they have nothing else. They need Trump badly.
Unless Biden can turn around the economy by the middle of 2024, I generally agree. There are two other rays of hope for democrats though. First, I think Trump is almost guaranteed to run. But, if for some reason he doesn't, he is likely to be the GOP's worst enemy by trashing their nominee. He's not going to go out and stump for DeSantis or Nikki Haley or whomever. Anyone who thinks he will selflessly step aside for the "good" of our nation, the GOP or any other reason is incredibly naive.

The GOP is pretty much pinning its hopes on Trump being successful at subverting state by state election systems.


I think the GOP establishment and Dem establishment realize that DeSantis is potentially a much better candidate than Trump, a better match vs Biden and is more likely to to bring back the white suburbanites that went for Biden but Trump still has the street. The irony is that DeSanris is much more dangerous than Trump plus actually smart- he'll continue to stoke the fires of Trumpism but with a "kinder face."
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Anarchistbear said:

In this system you vote for someone or against someone. We've had six years of disastrous government so it's going to be against but Biden doesn't inspire the dislike Trump does which means the Dems will continue to spin their "our democracy is at stake from fascists " fantasies because they have nothing else. They need Trump badly.
Unless Biden can turn around the economy by the middle of 2024, I generally agree. There are two other rays of hope for democrats though. First, I think Trump is almost guaranteed to run. But, if for some reason he doesn't, he is likely to be the GOP's worst enemy by trashing their nominee. He's not going to go out and stump for DeSantis or Nikki Haley or whomever. Anyone who thinks he will selflessly step aside for the "good" of our nation, the GOP or any other reason is incredibly naive.

The GOP is pretty much pinning its hopes on Trump being successful at subverting state by state election systems.


I think the GOP establishment and Dem establishment realize that DeSantis is potentially a much better candidate than Trump, a better match vs Biden and is more likely to to bring back the white suburbanites that went for Biden but Trump still has the street. The irony is that DeSanris is much more dangerous than Trump plus actually smart- he'll continue to stoke the fires of Trumpism but with a "kinder face."
Yup, we agree on this as well. But how is DeSantis going to do when Trump is trashing him 7 days a week? Is the GOP establishment ready to go to war with Trump but maintain Trumpism under DeSantis? Seems far-fetched. GOP is hoping Trump dies and anoints DeSantis but that's never going to happen.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

Anarchistbear said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Anarchistbear said:

In this system you vote for someone or against someone. We've had six years of disastrous government so it's going to be against but Biden doesn't inspire the dislike Trump does which means the Dems will continue to spin their "our democracy is at stake from fascists " fantasies because they have nothing else. They need Trump badly.
Unless Biden can turn around the economy by the middle of 2024, I generally agree. There are two other rays of hope for democrats though. First, I think Trump is almost guaranteed to run. But, if for some reason he doesn't, he is likely to be the GOP's worst enemy by trashing their nominee. He's not going to go out and stump for DeSantis or Nikki Haley or whomever. Anyone who thinks he will selflessly step aside for the "good" of our nation, the GOP or any other reason is incredibly naive.

The GOP is pretty much pinning its hopes on Trump being successful at subverting state by state election systems.


I think the GOP establishment and Dem establishment realize that DeSantis is potentially a much better candidate than Trump, a better match vs Biden and is more likely to to bring back the white suburbanites that went for Biden but Trump still has the street. The irony is that DeSanris is much more dangerous than Trump plus actually smart- he'll continue to stoke the fires of Trumpism but with a "kinder face."
Yup, we agree on this as well. But how is DeSantis going to do when Trump is trashing him 7 days a week? Is the GOP establishment ready to go to war with Trump but maintain Trumpism under DeSantis? Seems far-fetched. GOP is hoping Trump dies and anoints DeSantis but that's never going to happen.


I think the motivation is overriding hatred of Biden and Dems so they don't stay home similar to what Dems did in 2020.- more of our democracy is at stake. It will be very entertaining.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Anarchistbear said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Anarchistbear said:

In this system you vote for someone or against someone. We've had six years of disastrous government so it's going to be against but Biden doesn't inspire the dislike Trump does which means the Dems will continue to spin their "our democracy is at stake from fascists " fantasies because they have nothing else. They need Trump badly.
Unless Biden can turn around the economy by the middle of 2024, I generally agree. There are two other rays of hope for democrats though. First, I think Trump is almost guaranteed to run. But, if for some reason he doesn't, he is likely to be the GOP's worst enemy by trashing their nominee. He's not going to go out and stump for DeSantis or Nikki Haley or whomever. Anyone who thinks he will selflessly step aside for the "good" of our nation, the GOP or any other reason is incredibly naive.

The GOP is pretty much pinning its hopes on Trump being successful at subverting state by state election systems.


I think the GOP establishment and Dem establishment realize that DeSantis is potentially a much better candidate than Trump, a better match vs Biden and is more likely to to bring back the white suburbanites that went for Biden but Trump still has the street. The irony is that DeSanris is much more dangerous than Trump plus actually smart- he'll continue to stoke the fires of Trumpism but with a "kinder face."
Yup, we agree on this as well. But how is DeSantis going to do when Trump is trashing him 7 days a week? Is the GOP establishment ready to go to war with Trump but maintain Trumpism under DeSantis? Seems far-fetched. GOP is hoping Trump dies and anoints DeSantis but that's never going to happen.


I think the motivation is overriding hatred of Biden and Dems so they don't stay home similar to what Dems did in 2020. . It will be very entertaining.
Trump will control the narrative and if he's not the candidate it will largely consist of him trashing DeSantis. By comparison, complaints about Biden's gaffes won't rate very highly with the GOP base. Trump is going to cause a fracture if he's not the candidate.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Honestly, I think it's pretty likely that the economy is in decent shape by 2024.

Quite frankly, the economy is in unchartered waters and there is no telling what it will look like in 2024.

We have a Federal Reserve that has been "asleep" at the wheel and is now just coming to terms with inflation, not just by raising rates, but also cutting their $9 Trillion Dollar balance sheet. They've never done this (simultaneously) before. Moreover, their forecasting models have been so piss-poor that they've literally abandoned them and are focusing on top-line CPI and PCE numbers going forward. As a result, it's gonna take many many months to drop some of these high monthly inflation numbers from the YoY comparisions.

The risk is that the economy implodes in the second half of this year and the FED continues to tighten in order to get down to their 2% CPI target. And it's quite possible that we never see that 2% CPI rate again and the economy continues to display a 5 to 6% CPI. The Fed actually believes that with all of their tightening, the Unemployment Rate is only going to back up to 4.1% from 3.6% That sounds rather proposterous to me. It's anyone's guess given how unchartered these waters are. China's economy is horrible and the EU feels as though its about to fall off a cliff.

In my financial reading over the weekend, I even heard someone make the case for a "double-dip" recession like in the early 1980's.

And for what it's worth, although Q1 GDP was negative and it looks like Q2 will be negative as well . . . while technically meeting the "definition" of a Recession, it's quite possible that the past 2 quarters were so impacted by INVENTORIES that it's really not a meaningful representation of what is actually going on.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I will vote for ANYONE but Trump. And Biden is the only Democrat I've ever voted for. I will vote for Biden, Kamala, and any other idiot over the greatest idiot narcissist ever foisted onto us. The sad part, if Republicans are dumb enough to nominate this fat *******, is that the Democrats will once again nominate someone who's only qualification will be that they can beat Trump. It won't be someone young, bright and somewhat middle leaning.

#mytwocents
@4:46am
Sounds pretty good to me.

Latest rumor is Dem disenchantment from within will see Kamala retired from the VP first after a disastrous mid term. California Governor made new VP, the Jill pulls the plug on Covid Joe and whaddya know Newsom will run in 2024 as the incumbent.
That would be great but I doubt it will happen. Hard to swap out a VP, particularly for Newsom. I would like to see Pete B become the VP if there would be a swap since Pete is the best messenger the democrats have right now and he could actually do something with the VP platform.

I don't think Dr. Biden is calling the shots - there is no indication we're in a Ron and Nancy situation.

The most likely scenario by far is Biden/Harris running against Trump in 2024. It will be interesting to see which of his children Trump chooses as his running mate.
Even from a mod Repub Pete is a 2 percenter. Too weak, just like Kamala. For the Dems sake better be Newsom, Michelle or even Hill.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Honestly, I think it's pretty likely that the economy is in decent shape by 2024.
Sheesh, let's hope so. Sand is running on my time clock. Haha.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Trump was right, again.

Then:

Trump: Germany will be totally dependent on Russia energy if doesn't change course.
Germany: Laughing

Now:

Germany: Crying
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I will vote for ANYONE but Trump. And Biden is the only Democrat I've ever voted for. I will vote for Biden, Kamala, and any other idiot over the greatest idiot narcissist ever foisted onto us. The sad part, if Republicans are dumb enough to nominate this fat *******, is that the Democrats will once again nominate someone who's only qualification will be that they can beat Trump. It won't be someone young, bright and somewhat middle leaning.

#mytwocents
@4:46am
Sounds pretty good to me.

Latest rumor is Dem disenchantment from within will see Kamala retired from the VP first after a disastrous mid term. California Governor made new VP, the Jill pulls the plug on Covid Joe and whaddya know Newsom will run in 2024 as the incumbent.
That would be great but I doubt it will happen. Hard to swap out a VP, particularly for Newsom. I would like to see Pete B become the VP if there would be a swap since Pete is the best messenger the democrats have right now and he could actually do something with the VP platform.

I don't think Dr. Biden is calling the shots - there is no indication we're in a Ron and Nancy situation.

The most likely scenario by far is Biden/Harris running against Trump in 2024. It will be interesting to see which of his children Trump chooses as his running mate.
Even from a mod Repub Pete is a 2 percenter. Too weak, just like Kamala. For the Dems sake better be Newsom, Michelle or even Hill.
I don't know what you mean by 2 percenter. As for weak, Pete does a better job than anyone of communicating mainstream democrat policies and ideals and defending the Biden administration. Obviously Biden isn't the best mouthpiece and there is no one else in the administration who seems to be doing this. I would have expected Kamala to do it but she's been even weaker than Mike Pence, which is hard to imagine especially since she did a credible job attacking people during the campaign, even if it wasn't particularly helpful to her cause. Biden would have been better served by Warren or even someone like Jennifer Granholm.

Unfortunately Pete is still just a kid with very little political experience, but he's probably the best national politician right now at intelligently speaking to policy. There are other democrats who I think are pretty good like Chris Murphy and Jamie Raskin, but Pete regularly goes on Fox News and is able to effectively message on all manner of topics. I'm surprise they still have him on so often.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I will vote for ANYONE but Trump. And Biden is the only Democrat I've ever voted for. I will vote for Biden, Kamala, and any other idiot over the greatest idiot narcissist ever foisted onto us. The sad part, if Republicans are dumb enough to nominate this fat *******, is that the Democrats will once again nominate someone who's only qualification will be that they can beat Trump. It won't be someone young, bright and somewhat middle leaning.

#mytwocents
@4:46am
Sounds pretty good to me.

Latest rumor is Dem disenchantment from within will see Kamala retired from the VP first after a disastrous mid term. California Governor made new VP, the Jill pulls the plug on Covid Joe and whaddya know Newsom will run in 2024 as the incumbent.
That would be great but I doubt it will happen. Hard to swap out a VP, particularly for Newsom. I would like to see Pete B become the VP if there would be a swap since Pete is the best messenger the democrats have right now and he could actually do something with the VP platform.

I don't think Dr. Biden is calling the shots - there is no indication we're in a Ron and Nancy situation.

The most likely scenario by far is Biden/Harris running against Trump in 2024. It will be interesting to see which of his children Trump chooses as his running mate.
Even from a mod Repub Pete is a 2 percenter. Too weak, just like Kamala. For the Dems sake better be Newsom, Michelle or even Hill.
I don't know what you mean by 2 percenter. As for weak, Pete does a better job than anyone of communicating mainstream democrat policies and ideals and defending the Biden administration. Obviously Biden isn't the best mouthpiece and there is no one else in the administration who seems to be doing this. I would have expected Kamala to do it but she's been even weaker than Mike Pence, which is hard to imagine especially since she did a credible job attacking people during the campaign, even if it wasn't particularly helpful to her cause. Biden would have been better served by Warren or even someone like Jennifer Granholm.

Unfortunately Pete is still just a kid with very little political experience, but he's probably the best national politician right now at intelligently speaking to policy. There are other democrats who I think are pretty good like Chris Murphy and Jamie Raskin, but Pete regularly goes on Fox News and is able to effectively message on all manner of topics. I'm surprise they still have him on so often.
There were 17 two percenters on stage at the Dem debates and the aged Trump whupper survived.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I will vote for ANYONE but Trump. And Biden is the only Democrat I've ever voted for. I will vote for Biden, Kamala, and any other idiot over the greatest idiot narcissist ever foisted onto us. The sad part, if Republicans are dumb enough to nominate this fat *******, is that the Democrats will once again nominate someone who's only qualification will be that they can beat Trump. It won't be someone young, bright and somewhat middle leaning.

#mytwocents
@4:46am
Sounds pretty good to me.

Latest rumor is Dem disenchantment from within will see Kamala retired from the VP first after a disastrous mid term. California Governor made new VP, the Jill pulls the plug on Covid Joe and whaddya know Newsom will run in 2024 as the incumbent.
That would be great but I doubt it will happen. Hard to swap out a VP, particularly for Newsom. I would like to see Pete B become the VP if there would be a swap since Pete is the best messenger the democrats have right now and he could actually do something with the VP platform.

I don't think Dr. Biden is calling the shots - there is no indication we're in a Ron and Nancy situation.

The most likely scenario by far is Biden/Harris running against Trump in 2024. It will be interesting to see which of his children Trump chooses as his running mate.
Even from a mod Repub Pete is a 2 percenter. Too weak, just like Kamala. For the Dems sake better be Newsom, Michelle or even Hill.
I don't know what you mean by 2 percenter. As for weak, Pete does a better job than anyone of communicating mainstream democrat policies and ideals and defending the Biden administration. Obviously Biden isn't the best mouthpiece and there is no one else in the administration who seems to be doing this. I would have expected Kamala to do it but she's been even weaker than Mike Pence, which is hard to imagine especially since she did a credible job attacking people during the campaign, even if it wasn't particularly helpful to her cause. Biden would have been better served by Warren or even someone like Jennifer Granholm.

Unfortunately Pete is still just a kid with very little political experience, but he's probably the best national politician right now at intelligently speaking to policy. There are other democrats who I think are pretty good like Chris Murphy and Jamie Raskin, but Pete regularly goes on Fox News and is able to effectively message on all manner of topics. I'm surprise they still have him on so often.
There were 17 two percenters on stage at the Dem debates and the aged Trump whupper survived.
So what is a two percenter? I still have no idea what you are referring to. I know 1 percenters are rich and 3 percenters are white nationalists but what are 2 percenters?
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I will vote for ANYONE but Trump. And Biden is the only Democrat I've ever voted for. I will vote for Biden, Kamala, and any other idiot over the greatest idiot narcissist ever foisted onto us. The sad part, if Republicans are dumb enough to nominate this fat *******, is that the Democrats will once again nominate someone who's only qualification will be that they can beat Trump. It won't be someone young, bright and somewhat middle leaning.

#mytwocents
@4:46am
Sounds pretty good to me.

Latest rumor is Dem disenchantment from within will see Kamala retired from the VP first after a disastrous mid term. California Governor made new VP, the Jill pulls the plug on Covid Joe and whaddya know Newsom will run in 2024 as the incumbent.
That would be great but I doubt it will happen. Hard to swap out a VP, particularly for Newsom. I would like to see Pete B become the VP if there would be a swap since Pete is the best messenger the democrats have right now and he could actually do something with the VP platform.

I don't think Dr. Biden is calling the shots - there is no indication we're in a Ron and Nancy situation.

The most likely scenario by far is Biden/Harris running against Trump in 2024. It will be interesting to see which of his children Trump chooses as his running mate.
Even from a mod Repub Pete is a 2 percenter. Too weak, just like Kamala. For the Dems sake better be Newsom, Michelle or even Hill.
I don't know what you mean by 2 percenter. As for weak, Pete does a better job than anyone of communicating mainstream democrat policies and ideals and defending the Biden administration. Obviously Biden isn't the best mouthpiece and there is no one else in the administration who seems to be doing this. I would have expected Kamala to do it but she's been even weaker than Mike Pence, which is hard to imagine especially since she did a credible job attacking people during the campaign, even if it wasn't particularly helpful to her cause. Biden would have been better served by Warren or even someone like Jennifer Granholm.

Unfortunately Pete is still just a kid with very little political experience, but he's probably the best national politician right now at intelligently speaking to policy. There are other democrats who I think are pretty good like Chris Murphy and Jamie Raskin, but Pete regularly goes on Fox News and is able to effectively message on all manner of topics. I'm surprise they still have him on so often.
There were 17 two percenters on stage at the Dem debates and the aged Trump whupper survived.
So what is a two percenter? I still have no idea what you are referring to. I know 1 percenters are rich and 3 percenters are white nationalists but what are 2 percenters?
No Dem could garner over 2% of the vote in 2020 so Biden stepped up to the plate
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I will vote for ANYONE but Trump. And Biden is the only Democrat I've ever voted for. I will vote for Biden, Kamala, and any other idiot over the greatest idiot narcissist ever foisted onto us. The sad part, if Republicans are dumb enough to nominate this fat *******, is that the Democrats will once again nominate someone who's only qualification will be that they can beat Trump. It won't be someone young, bright and somewhat middle leaning.

#mytwocents
@4:46am
Sounds pretty good to me.

Latest rumor is Dem disenchantment from within will see Kamala retired from the VP first after a disastrous mid term. California Governor made new VP, the Jill pulls the plug on Covid Joe and whaddya know Newsom will run in 2024 as the incumbent.
That would be great but I doubt it will happen. Hard to swap out a VP, particularly for Newsom. I would like to see Pete B become the VP if there would be a swap since Pete is the best messenger the democrats have right now and he could actually do something with the VP platform.

I don't think Dr. Biden is calling the shots - there is no indication we're in a Ron and Nancy situation.

The most likely scenario by far is Biden/Harris running against Trump in 2024. It will be interesting to see which of his children Trump chooses as his running mate.
Even from a mod Repub Pete is a 2 percenter. Too weak, just like Kamala. For the Dems sake better be Newsom, Michelle or even Hill.
I don't know what you mean by 2 percenter. As for weak, Pete does a better job than anyone of communicating mainstream democrat policies and ideals and defending the Biden administration. Obviously Biden isn't the best mouthpiece and there is no one else in the administration who seems to be doing this. I would have expected Kamala to do it but she's been even weaker than Mike Pence, which is hard to imagine especially since she did a credible job attacking people during the campaign, even if it wasn't particularly helpful to her cause. Biden would have been better served by Warren or even someone like Jennifer Granholm.

Unfortunately Pete is still just a kid with very little political experience, but he's probably the best national politician right now at intelligently speaking to policy. There are other democrats who I think are pretty good like Chris Murphy and Jamie Raskin, but Pete regularly goes on Fox News and is able to effectively message on all manner of topics. I'm surprise they still have him on so often.
There were 17 two percenters on stage at the Dem debates and the aged Trump whupper survived.
So what is a two percenter? I still have no idea what you are referring to. I know 1 percenters are rich and 3 percenters are white nationalists but what are 2 percenters?
No Dem could garner over 2% of the vote in 2020 so Biden stepped up to the plate.
That's how you remember it?



OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I will vote for ANYONE but Trump. And Biden is the only Democrat I've ever voted for. I will vote for Biden, Kamala, and any other idiot over the greatest idiot narcissist ever foisted onto us. The sad part, if Republicans are dumb enough to nominate this fat *******, is that the Democrats will once again nominate someone who's only qualification will be that they can beat Trump. It won't be someone young, bright and somewhat middle leaning.

#mytwocents
@4:46am
Sounds pretty good to me.

Latest rumor is Dem disenchantment from within will see Kamala retired from the VP first after a disastrous mid term. California Governor made new VP, the Jill pulls the plug on Covid Joe and whaddya know Newsom will run in 2024 as the incumbent.
That would be great but I doubt it will happen. Hard to swap out a VP, particularly for Newsom. I would like to see Pete B become the VP if there would be a swap since Pete is the best messenger the democrats have right now and he could actually do something with the VP platform.

I don't think Dr. Biden is calling the shots - there is no indication we're in a Ron and Nancy situation.

The most likely scenario by far is Biden/Harris running against Trump in 2024. It will be interesting to see which of his children Trump chooses as his running mate.
Even from a mod Repub Pete is a 2 percenter. Too weak, just like Kamala. For the Dems sake better be Newsom, Michelle or even Hill.
I don't know what you mean by 2 percenter. As for weak, Pete does a better job than anyone of communicating mainstream democrat policies and ideals and defending the Biden administration. Obviously Biden isn't the best mouthpiece and there is no one else in the administration who seems to be doing this. I would have expected Kamala to do it but she's been even weaker than Mike Pence, which is hard to imagine especially since she did a credible job attacking people during the campaign, even if it wasn't particularly helpful to her cause. Biden would have been better served by Warren or even someone like Jennifer Granholm.

Unfortunately Pete is still just a kid with very little political experience, but he's probably the best national politician right now at intelligently speaking to policy. There are other democrats who I think are pretty good like Chris Murphy and Jamie Raskin, but Pete regularly goes on Fox News and is able to effectively message on all manner of topics. I'm surprise they still have him on so often.
There were 17 two percenters on stage at the Dem debates and the aged Trump whupper survived.
So what is a two percenter? I still have no idea what you are referring to. I know 1 percenters are rich and 3 percenters are white nationalists but what are 2 percenters?
No Dem could garner over 2% of the vote in 2020 so Biden stepped up to the plate.
That's how you remember it?




Sheesh. Give me a bit of license (add 0.5% to Pete). There was absolute blockage of Bernie by mainstream in the Dem party and the rest just never got there, or even close. ABT (Anybody But Trump) was the thrust. It worked.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden came in 4th in the Iowa caucus and 5th in the New Hampshire primary. Bernie Sanders had twice has many votes as Biden in Iowa and more than 3 times as many votes in New Hampshire.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I will vote for ANYONE but Trump. And Biden is the only Democrat I've ever voted for. I will vote for Biden, Kamala, and any other idiot over the greatest idiot narcissist ever foisted onto us. The sad part, if Republicans are dumb enough to nominate this fat *******, is that the Democrats will once again nominate someone who's only qualification will be that they can beat Trump. It won't be someone young, bright and somewhat middle leaning.

#mytwocents
@4:46am
Sounds pretty good to me.

Latest rumor is Dem disenchantment from within will see Kamala retired from the VP first after a disastrous mid term. California Governor made new VP, the Jill pulls the plug on Covid Joe and whaddya know Newsom will run in 2024 as the incumbent.
That would be great but I doubt it will happen. Hard to swap out a VP, particularly for Newsom. I would like to see Pete B become the VP if there would be a swap since Pete is the best messenger the democrats have right now and he could actually do something with the VP platform.

I don't think Dr. Biden is calling the shots - there is no indication we're in a Ron and Nancy situation.

The most likely scenario by far is Biden/Harris running against Trump in 2024. It will be interesting to see which of his children Trump chooses as his running mate.
Even from a mod Repub Pete is a 2 percenter. Too weak, just like Kamala. For the Dems sake better be Newsom, Michelle or even Hill.
I don't know what you mean by 2 percenter. As for weak, Pete does a better job than anyone of communicating mainstream democrat policies and ideals and defending the Biden administration. Obviously Biden isn't the best mouthpiece and there is no one else in the administration who seems to be doing this. I would have expected Kamala to do it but she's been even weaker than Mike Pence, which is hard to imagine especially since she did a credible job attacking people during the campaign, even if it wasn't particularly helpful to her cause. Biden would have been better served by Warren or even someone like Jennifer Granholm.

Unfortunately Pete is still just a kid with very little political experience, but he's probably the best national politician right now at intelligently speaking to policy. There are other democrats who I think are pretty good like Chris Murphy and Jamie Raskin, but Pete regularly goes on Fox News and is able to effectively message on all manner of topics. I'm surprise they still have him on so often.
There were 17 two percenters on stage at the Dem debates and the aged Trump whupper survived.
So what is a two percenter? I still have no idea what you are referring to. I know 1 percenters are rich and 3 percenters are white nationalists but what are 2 percenters?
No Dem could garner over 2% of the vote in 2020 so Biden stepped up to the plate.
That's how you remember it?




Sheesh. Give me a bit of license. There was absolute blockage of Bernie by mainstream in the Dem party and the rest just never got there, or even close. ABT (Anybody But Trump) was the thrust. It worked.
The rest coalesced around Biden because they did not want Bernie, who has never been a true Democrat just like Trump has never been a true Republican. By the way, Amy would have kicked ass as a VP instead of the first timer from CA.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

Biden came in 4th in the Iowa caucus and 5th in the New Hampshire primary. Bernie Sanders had twice has many votes as Biden in Iowa and more than 3 times as many votes in New Hampshire.
I guess they should have just called the primary after those two states. Bernie will never make it out of the primary. Just won't happen.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

BearForce2 said:

Biden came in 4th in the Iowa caucus and 5th in the New Hampshire primary. Bernie Sanders had twice has many votes as Biden in Iowa and more than 3 times as many votes in New Hampshire.
I guess they should have just called the primary after those two states. Bernie will never make it out of the primary. Just won't happen.
We would never know. Who could have predicted Biden to be so popular despite a disastrous and unprecedented start to the Democratic primaries?
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

OdontoBear66 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I will vote for ANYONE but Trump. And Biden is the only Democrat I've ever voted for. I will vote for Biden, Kamala, and any other idiot over the greatest idiot narcissist ever foisted onto us. The sad part, if Republicans are dumb enough to nominate this fat *******, is that the Democrats will once again nominate someone who's only qualification will be that they can beat Trump. It won't be someone young, bright and somewhat middle leaning.

#mytwocents
@4:46am
Sounds pretty good to me.

Latest rumor is Dem disenchantment from within will see Kamala retired from the VP first after a disastrous mid term. California Governor made new VP, the Jill pulls the plug on Covid Joe and whaddya know Newsom will run in 2024 as the incumbent.
That would be great but I doubt it will happen. Hard to swap out a VP, particularly for Newsom. I would like to see Pete B become the VP if there would be a swap since Pete is the best messenger the democrats have right now and he could actually do something with the VP platform.

I don't think Dr. Biden is calling the shots - there is no indication we're in a Ron and Nancy situation.

The most likely scenario by far is Biden/Harris running against Trump in 2024. It will be interesting to see which of his children Trump chooses as his running mate.
Even from a mod Repub Pete is a 2 percenter. Too weak, just like Kamala. For the Dems sake better be Newsom, Michelle or even Hill.
I don't know what you mean by 2 percenter. As for weak, Pete does a better job than anyone of communicating mainstream democrat policies and ideals and defending the Biden administration. Obviously Biden isn't the best mouthpiece and there is no one else in the administration who seems to be doing this. I would have expected Kamala to do it but she's been even weaker than Mike Pence, which is hard to imagine especially since she did a credible job attacking people during the campaign, even if it wasn't particularly helpful to her cause. Biden would have been better served by Warren or even someone like Jennifer Granholm.

Unfortunately Pete is still just a kid with very little political experience, but he's probably the best national politician right now at intelligently speaking to policy. There are other democrats who I think are pretty good like Chris Murphy and Jamie Raskin, but Pete regularly goes on Fox News and is able to effectively message on all manner of topics. I'm surprise they still have him on so often.
There were 17 two percenters on stage at the Dem debates and the aged Trump whupper survived.
So what is a two percenter? I still have no idea what you are referring to. I know 1 percenters are rich and 3 percenters are white nationalists but what are 2 percenters?
No Dem could garner over 2% of the vote in 2020 so Biden stepped up to the plate.
That's how you remember it?




Sheesh. Give me a bit of license (add 0.5% to Pete). There was absolute blockage of Bernie by mainstream in the Dem party and the rest just never got there, or even close. ABT (Anybody But Trump) was the thrust. It worked.
You moved the goalposts quite a bit. Biden was the safe choice to defeat the worst president the GOP could find. He still is the safe choice when the GOP nominates the worst person they can find for the 3rd consecutive term. Trump will probably run again and lose in 2028 because the GOP won't be able to find anyone worse.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

calbear93 said:

BearForce2 said:

Biden came in 4th in the Iowa caucus and 5th in the New Hampshire primary. Bernie Sanders had twice has many votes as Biden in Iowa and more than 3 times as many votes in New Hampshire.
I guess they should have just called the primary after those two states. Bernie will never make it out of the primary. Just won't happen.
We would never know. Who could have predicted Biden to be so popular despite a disastrous and unprecedented start to the Democratic primaries?
Yeah, Bernie was fun as a form of conveying discontentment, but he would have been a bigger disaster. Biden thought that his job was to appoint a diverse cabinet without much thought into a diverse AND COMPETENT cabinet and be the next FDR. Bernie would have thought that FDR was too conservative.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bernie then proceeded to win Nevada garnering more than twice as many votes as Biden. At the point, the DNC was shieting bricks.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

Bernie then proceeded to win Nevada garnering more than twice as many votes as Biden. At the point, the DNC was shieting bricks.
You mean there was politics involved in political parties. Good thing the RNC didn't show any favoritism.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:


The rest coalesced around Biden because they did not want Bernie, who has never been a true Democrat just like Trump has never been a true Republican. By the way, Amy would have kicked ass as a VP instead of the first timer from CA.

I would agree 100% with this.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

BearForce2 said:

Bernie then proceeded to win Nevada garnering more than twice as many votes as Biden. At the point, the DNC was shieting bricks.
You mean there was politics involved in political parties. Good thing the RNC didn't show any favoritism.

The RNC wanted Jeb Bush but the people wanted Donald Trump.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

calbear93 said:

BearForce2 said:

Bernie then proceeded to win Nevada garnering more than twice as many votes as Biden. At the point, the DNC was shieting bricks.
You mean there was politics involved in political parties. Good thing the RNC didn't show any favoritism.

The RNC wanted Jeb Bush but the people wanted Donald Trump.
Who is talking about the 2016 election? Instead of taking a neutral stand on republican infighting since 2016, RNC is basically a national committee of Trump.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

BearForce2 said:

calbear93 said:

BearForce2 said:

Bernie then proceeded to win Nevada garnering more than twice as many votes as Biden. At the point, the DNC was shieting bricks.
You mean there was politics involved in political parties. Good thing the RNC didn't show any favoritism.

The RNC wanted Jeb Bush but the people wanted Donald Trump.
Who is talking about the 2016 election? Instead of taking a neutral stand on republican infighting since 2016, RNC is basically a national committee of Trump.


The RNC doesn't have a choice. But they would prefer someone like Mike Pence.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

calbear93 said:

BearForce2 said:

calbear93 said:

BearForce2 said:

Bernie then proceeded to win Nevada garnering more than twice as many votes as Biden. At the point, the DNC was shieting bricks.
You mean there was politics involved in political parties. Good thing the RNC didn't show any favoritism.

The RNC wanted Jeb Bush but the people wanted Donald Trump.
Who is talking about the 2016 election? Instead of taking a neutral stand on republican infighting since 2016, RNC is basically a national committee of Trump.

The RNC doesn't have a choice. But they would prefer someone like Mike Pence.
They absolutely have a choice. They can choose to defend incumbents instead of following the whims of a former president.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nothing is more overrated in terms of power than the DNC and the RNC. Voters don't care about the DNC and the RNC.

Trump defeated the RNC and black Democratic voters made Biden the non-Bernie option.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The versatile Jonathan Lemire Politico's White House bureau chief, and host of MSNBC's "Way Too Early" is out today with "The Big Lie," including this account of President Trump's disastrous press conference with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki in 2018:

Fiona Hill, the senior Russia expert on the National Security Council, who was sitting one row in front of me, later told me that she considered doing something, anything including faking a heart attack to disrupt the proceedings and get Trump to stop talking.

Lemire recounts the day the seed of his narrative was planted way back at a Donald Trump rally on Aug. 1, 2016.

"My lead for the Associated Press, which was on the wire and online within minutes and then printed the next day in newspapers throughout the country and mirrored on websites around the world, was simple and stark":

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump suggested Monday that he fears the general election "is going to be rigged" an unprecedented assertion by a modern presidential candidate." Axios
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Nothing is more overrated in terms of power than the DNC and the RNC. Voters don't care about the DNC and the RNC.

Trump defeated the RNC and black Democratic voters made Biden the non-Bernie option.
Yeah, they have their preferences but clearly can't force voters to back their candidates.

Obama also beat Hillary in 2008 when she was the DNC choice going in.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:


Fiona Hill, the senior Russia expert on the National Security Council, who was sitting one row in front of me, later told me that she considered doing something, anything including faking a heart attack to disrupt the proceedings and get Trump to stop talking.

This is really funny. I wonder if she considered faking a heart attack when Obama wore a tan suit.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

Anarchistbear said:

In this system you vote for someone or against someone. We've had six years of disastrous government so it's going to be against but Biden doesn't inspire the dislike Trump does which means the Dems will continue to spin their "our democracy is at stake from fascists " fantasies because they have nothing else. They need Trump badly.
Unless Biden can turn around the economy by the middle of 2024, I generally agree. There are two other rays of hope for democrats though. First, I think Trump is almost guaranteed to run. But, if for some reason he doesn't, he is likely to be the GOP's worst enemy by trashing their nominee. He's not going to go out and stump for DeSantis or Nikki Haley or whomever. Anyone who thinks he will selflessly step aside for the "good" of our nation, the GOP or any other reason is incredibly naive.

The GOP is pretty much pinning its hopes on Trump being successful at subverting state by state election systems.
I think of it like this. If you want to destroy this Republic and Democracy then you will vote for the Criminal in Chief who is still trying to overturn the 2020 election. If you want to keep this Republic and Democracy intact you will vote for somebody who loves this country more than themselves. I may not want to see a Republican in the White House in 2024 but, as long as it is a Republican who understands the value of our system of government I can tolerate it until the next election.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Anarchistbear said:

In this system you vote for someone or against someone. We've had six years of disastrous government so it's going to be against but Biden doesn't inspire the dislike Trump does which means the Dems will continue to spin their "our democracy is at stake from fascists " fantasies because they have nothing else. They need Trump badly.
Unless Biden can turn around the economy by the middle of 2024, I generally agree. There are two other rays of hope for democrats though. First, I think Trump is almost guaranteed to run. But, if for some reason he doesn't, he is likely to be the GOP's worst enemy by trashing their nominee. He's not going to go out and stump for DeSantis or Nikki Haley or whomever. Anyone who thinks he will selflessly step aside for the "good" of our nation, the GOP or any other reason is incredibly naive.

The GOP is pretty much pinning its hopes on Trump being successful at subverting state by state election systems.
I think of it like this. If you want to destroy this Republic and Democracy then you will vote for the Criminal in Chief who is still trying to overturn the 2020 election. If you want to keep this Republic and Democracy intact you will vote for somebody who loves this country more than themselves. I may not want to see a Republican in the White House in 2024 but, as long as it is a Republican who understands the value of our system of government I can tolerate it until the next election.


Which politician loves the country more than themself? I'll settle for anyone close to normal. Give me two of them to vote for and then I'll start looking into their 'details'.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.