Whoops!Quote:
tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit
Taxes have literally gone down for the rich and corporations under Biden. https://t.co/Atm6xSgP1W
— π΅πΈ π ²π ·ππ ²π ΊπΎπͺ (@benigma2017) May 9, 2024
bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
Big C said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?
bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
Like tRump, if you ever end up as a defendant in criminal action, your lawyer won't let you testify because you can't process a question and formulate a responsive answer. You are stuck in non sequitur non responsive world.
bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
Like tRump, if you ever end up as a defendant in criminal action, your lawyer won't let you testify because you can't process a question and formulate a responsive answer. You are stuck in non sequitur non responsive world.
It's not Trump's lawyer than won't let him testify, it's the corrupt judge. You know this.
bearister said:
She will be the "pretend wife" based on the elasticity of the compensation clause, but when it comes to her pride and joy, it's HANDS OFF, ORANGE LUCIFER!
"While Barron is honored to have been chosen as a delegate by the Florida Republican Party, he regretfully declines to participate due to prior commitments," former first lady Melania Trump's office said in a statement to media.
Melania Trump's office and the RNC did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment."
Barron Trump declines to serve as Florida delegate to RNC
https://www.axios.com/2024/05/10/barron-trump-florida-delegate-rnc
*One has to wonder if tRump not knowing his son's age was a triggering event with regard to Barron's withdrawal.
82gradDLSdad said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
Like tRump, if you ever end up as a defendant in criminal action, your lawyer won't let you testify because you can't process a question and formulate a responsive answer. You are stuck in non sequitur non responsive world.
It's not Trump's lawyer than won't let him testify, it's the corrupt judge. You know this.
I'm not a lawyer and I would never let Trump speak in a trial unless opposing counsel was me! I assume any competent lawyer could make Trump look like a bigger narcissistic idiot than he already is.
bear2034 said:Big C said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?
I don't know, is this true? Outside of STEM majors isn't college more worthless now than ever especially since tuition has skyrocketed to astronomical levels?
Big C said:bear2034 said:Big C said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?
I don't know, is this true? Outside of STEM majors isn't college more worthless now than ever especially since tuition has skyrocketed to astronomical levels?
A college education, outside of STEM majors, is worthless (or "more worthless")? It's funny that you have almost 10k posts on a college sports website, all this stuff being so worthless.
He actually makes a good point and one that has been made by many others.Big C said:bear2034 said:Big C said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?
I don't know, is this true? Outside of STEM majors isn't college more worthless now than ever especially since tuition has skyrocketed to astronomical levels?
A college education, outside of STEM majors, is worthless (or "more worthless")? It's funny that you have almost 10k posts on a college sports website, all this stuff being so worthless.
75% of New Jobs Require a Degree While Only 40% of Potential Applicants Have Onehttps://t.co/KaRZkDEyPG
— Truthout (@truthout) August 7, 2022
The Ghoul said:He actually makes a good point and one that has been made by many others.Big C said:bear2034 said:Big C said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?
I don't know, is this true? Outside of STEM majors isn't college more worthless now than ever especially since tuition has skyrocketed to astronomical levels?
A college education, outside of STEM majors, is worthless (or "more worthless")? It's funny that you have almost 10k posts on a college sports website, all this stuff being so worthless.75% of New Jobs Require a Degree While Only 40% of Potential Applicants Have Onehttps://t.co/KaRZkDEyPG
— Truthout (@truthout) August 7, 2022
Many jobs that before the 70's wouldn't have required a college degree now do, even though the tasks required by the job don't require any advanced knowledge. And given how ridiculously expensive college is now, when you compare the wage of many of the jobs those graduates well get compared to how much money plumbers, electricians, etc. make, is college really worth the cost? Just another way that the system has been screwing us since the Clinton years, which is about the time the cost of college started spiraling out of control.
And the best part, as demonstrated on a daily basis on this board, is that the people with the degrees aren't even any smarter than those without.
LOL at the arrogance shown here.The Ghoul said:Nancy Pelosi did not like what I had to say...
— Winston Marshall (@MrWinMarshall) May 10, 2024
Populism is not a threat to democracy.
Democrat elites like her are.
Watch my full Oxford Union speech from the debate with her: pic.twitter.com/ZNm8maNZjy
In her speech, Pelosi argues that voters are βblockedβ from making good, rational decisions and voting Democrat because of their culture and views on God
— Winston Marshall (@MrWinMarshall) May 11, 2024
Watch: pic.twitter.com/YAtkNoBGVN
bear2034 said:82gradDLSdad said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:bear2034 said:bearister said:
I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.
Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
Like tRump, if you ever end up as a defendant in criminal action, your lawyer won't let you testify because you can't process a question and formulate a responsive answer. You are stuck in non sequitur non responsive world.
It's not Trump's lawyer than won't let him testify, it's the corrupt judge. You know this.
I'm not a lawyer and I would never let Trump speak in a trial unless opposing counsel was me! I assume any competent lawyer could make Trump look like a bigger narcissistic idiot than he already is.
Well, here's their chance but so far, they haven't. Why? Because Trump's testimony would wreck their chances of getting Trump. Communists don't allow others to speak, that's what they do.
They were told he was done
— Jack Poso πΊπΈ (@JackPosobiec) May 12, 2024
They were told he had no chance
They were told he was a criminal
And 80,000 people showed up anyway pic.twitter.com/6e36rjDYz8
NEW: NFL great Lawrence Taylor says he was a Democrat his entire life until he met Donald Trump.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) May 12, 2024
βI grew up a Democrat, and I've always been a Democrat until I met this man right here.β
βNobody in my family will ever vote for a Democrat again.β
Taylor was joined by former NFL⦠pic.twitter.com/MZxBKw5dV7
The Ghoul said:LOL at the arrogance shown here.The Ghoul said:Nancy Pelosi did not like what I had to say...
— Winston Marshall (@MrWinMarshall) May 10, 2024
Populism is not a threat to democracy.
Democrat elites like her are.
Watch my full Oxford Union speech from the debate with her: pic.twitter.com/ZNm8maNZjyIn her speech, Pelosi argues that voters are βblockedβ from making good, rational decisions and voting Democrat because of their culture and views on God
— Winston Marshall (@MrWinMarshall) May 11, 2024
Watch: pic.twitter.com/YAtkNoBGVN
The cameras do not capture her reaction properly.
— Melissa Chen (@MsMelChen) May 10, 2024
I wish one was trained on Congresswoman Pelosi the whole time, showing her flagrant violations of decorum, bristling and interrupting at various points in his speech.
Simply put, this is someone who is not used to be beingβ¦
Forgetting which burner account he logged in with.AunBear89 said:
Copying from Minot, or he from you (I don't care really and can't be bothered to look who was first):
Can't decide if this is an example of the blind leading the blind, or stupid is as stupid doesβ¦
Maybe both?
When you see such a coordinated effort to try & deflect, cover up or change the national conversation.
— Eric Pistey (@shawnpisteySC) May 13, 2024
Youβll recognize just how intertwined establishment media is to the Democrat party. https://t.co/FVM44Vchp9
bearister said:
As you know, I believe tRump will absolutely winβ¦.but what I will say is that I think cranky old Republicans are the only ones that respond to pollsters. Most people I know consider them spammers wasting their time.
If that ends of being the case, and tRump loses, he will sell it as Stolen Election II. The Deplorables will be work up good and plenty with chubby chafed inner thighs. But maybe if they act up again, this statement will apply:
concordtom said:bearister said:
As you know, I believe tRump will absolutely winβ¦.but what I will say is that I think cranky old Republicans are the only ones that respond to pollsters. Most people I know consider them spammers wasting their time.
If that ends of being the case, and tRump loses, he will sell it as Stolen Election II. The Deplorables will be work up good and plenty with chubby chafed inner thighs. But maybe if they act up again, this statement will apply:
And if trump wins??
concordtom said:
I can't imagine he could be sworn in on January 20.
I can't fathom it.
bear2034 said:concordtom said:
I can't imagine he could be sworn in on January 20.
I can't fathom it.
I can.
concordtom said:Great video!bear2034 said:I can.concordtom said:
I can't imagine he could be sworn in on January 20.
I can't fathom it.
And you're one of the white racists laughing along with it.
The next time you are accused of something by someone - a co-worker, neighbor, friend, significant other, stranger - ask yourself if it would be ok if only they were allowed to speak/accuse/antagonize while you were not allowed to respond to defend yourself. If your answer is no,β¦
— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) May 11, 2024
concordtom said:
If trump loses in November, his delay delay delay pass will expire. He won't be able to run again again in 2028. He will face multiple jailable cases.
That's when he flees to Dubai.
Democrats indicting Trump
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) May 14, 2024
pic.twitter.com/BKU0pnlXwH
