Biden implicated

106,725 Views | 1137 Replies | Last: 23 days ago by bear2034
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

The evidence stays at zilch.

Why would the Reich Security Service hand over evidence that would incriminate Hitler?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Will Hunter Biden business partner testify? I don't think the Swamp will allow that.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12203003/Biden-business-partner-Devon-Archer-COOPERATING-Republicans-alleged-10-million-payment.html

Is this the 76th or 77th time that DEMOCRATS DOOM happens next week?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One theory is if the UniParty allows the dirt out of the bag, they want Biden out and Newsom in.

The Globalists want a Bewsom - DeSanctimonious matchup.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forget about Hillary or Hunter for a moment.

Why would Trump keep those classified documents? Why would he do this? Why would he put America in DANGER? Who did he show those papers to?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Forget about Hillary or Hunter for a moment.

Why would Trump keep those classified documents? Why would he do this? Why would he put America in DANGER? Who did he show those papers to?



The now political National Archives refused to review the documents with the Trump Whitehouse, as they did four previous Administration's.

The National Archives (?) dumped dozens of boxes outside the Whitehouse for Trumps team to take.

What he supposedly took that is dangerous has been purposefully hidden. Reportedly the items in question ate a personal letter from President Barack Obama, and a personal letter from PM Kim Jong.

Nothing dangerous in those letters.

OK, so now answer my simple question.

What did Joe, Jim, and Hunter Biden do for between $10 and $30 Million from employers like Chinese CCP leaders and Ukranian oligarchs?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

DiabloWags said:

Forget about Hillary or Hunter for a moment.

Why would Trump keep those classified documents? Why would he do this? Why would he put America in DANGER? Who did he show those papers to?




What he supposedly took that is dangerous has been purposefully hidden. Reportedly the items in question ate a personal letter from President Barack Obama, and a personal letter from PM Kim Jong.

Nothing dangerous in those letters.


You're INSANE.



movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obtuse Lawfare language and postering.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Obtuse Lawfare language and postering.

You might want to try reading the INDICTMENT.
You clearly havent bothered to do so.

trump-indictment.pdf (d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net)
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Forget about Hillary or Hunter for a moment.

Why would Trump keep those classified documents? Why would he do this? Why would he put America in DANGER? Who did he show those papers to?



Trump declassified the damning Crossfire Hurricane records on 1/19/21 (day before leaving office).

Deep State convinced White House chief of staff to order a privacy review on 1/20/21, before publicly releasing.

These documents were never released to the public.

Trump had his own copy.

Biden's DOJ raided Mar-a-Lago and took them.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:

DiabloWags said:

Forget about Hillary or Hunter for a moment.

Why would Trump keep those classified documents? Why would he do this? Why would he put America in DANGER? Who did he show those papers to?



Trump declassified the damning Crossfire Hurricane records on 1/19/21 (day before leaving office).

Deep State convinced White House chief of staff to order a privacy review on 1/20/21, before publicly releasing.

These documents were never released to the public.

Trump had his own copy.

Biden's DOJ raided Mar-a-Lago and took them.
Gee, what a damn shame! If only Trump had released his copy during the 18+ months before it was recovered by the FBI.

Yet another unprovable claim by BearHunterBiden and his fellow travelers.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But do they have the Maltese Falcon?

BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?


After supposedly five years of investigation the Biden DOJ found Hunter Biden guilty of only TWO MISDEMEANORS and ONE GUN CHARGE!
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our corrupt DOJ on display for the whole world to see.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Our corrupt DOJ on display for the whole world to see.

You sound agitated today.
More than usual . . . and that's saying A LOT.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:


After supposedly five years of investigation the Biden DOJ found Hunter Biden guilty of only TWO MISDEMEANORS and ONE GUN CHARGE!

And the U.S. Attorney who prosecuted Hunter was none other than David Weiss.
A TRUMP APPOINTEE . . . APPOINTED TO MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN!

BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearHunter said:


After supposedly five years of investigation the Biden DOJ found Hunter Biden guilty of only TWO MISDEMEANORS and ONE GUN CHARGE!

And the U.S. Attorney who prosecuted Hunter was none other than David Weiss.
A TRUMP APPOINTEE . . . APPOINTED TO MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN!


Handpicked by Democrat senators.
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Our corrupt DOJ on display for the whole world to see.
The CCP uses this as ammunition anytime they receive criticism from the Biden administration.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:

DiabloWags said:

BearHunter said:


After supposedly five years of investigation the Biden DOJ found Hunter Biden guilty of only TWO MISDEMEANORS and ONE GUN CHARGE!

And the U.S. Attorney who prosecuted Hunter was none other than David Weiss.
A TRUMP APPOINTEE . . . APPOINTED TO MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN!

Handpicked by Democrat senators.


Nominated by the Orange Buffoon.
Confirmed by a voice vote.

Sounds like you have buyer's remorse.
Trump only APPOINTS THE BEST PEOPLE!

Lmfao.



BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearHunter said:

DiabloWags said:

BearHunter said:


After supposedly five years of investigation the Biden DOJ found Hunter Biden guilty of only TWO MISDEMEANORS and ONE GUN CHARGE!

And the U.S. Attorney who prosecuted Hunter was none other than David Weiss.
A TRUMP APPOINTEE . . . APPOINTED TO MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN!

Handpicked by Democrat senators.

Appointed by the Orange Buffoon.
Confirmed by a voice vote.

Sounds like you have buyer's remorse.
Trump only APPOINTS THE BEST PEOPLE!


Bro, now you know.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:




Bro, now you know.

Doesnt sound like you know who APPOINTED BILL BARR.

Bwahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa!
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tucker Carlson's take.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TUCKER WAS FIRED FROM THE FAUX NEWS TRUMP NETWORK FOR LYING.

ITS FUNNY THAT YOU THINK HE HAS ANY CREDIBILITY.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Five Pinocchios amateur.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TRUMP ONLY HIRES THE BEST PEOPLE!

10 PINOCCHIOS FROM THE LIAR IN CHIEF.


BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Bro, take a deep breath and unlock your CAPS KEY. Even AOC is on your side.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't know about you but I kind of prefer this more than usual unhinged version of you.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some people have been terribly upset ever since the announcement of Trump's indictment.
In fact, they spent their entire 3 day weekend here being upset. Did they even spend Father's Day with their Dad?




BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Some people have been terribly upset ever since the announcement of Trump's indictment.


Relax. We all know the Democrats are cheaters.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why would you care?
You're not an American.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

TUCKER WAS FIRED FROM THE FAUX NEWS TRUMP NETWORK FOR LYING.

ITS FUNNY THAT YOU THINK HE HAS ANY CREDIBILITY.


Tucker was taken out by the Globalist UniParty. He's been taking on the $wamp and the MICC.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:




Relax. We all know the Democrats are cheaters.

Trump was in office for 4 years.
Trump had FOUR YEARS to prosecute Hillary, but never did.
You seem to conveniently ignore that.

Shocker.

BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearHunter said:

Relax. We all know the Democrats are cheaters.

Trump was in office for 4 years.
Trump had FOUR YEARS to prosecute Hillary, but never did.
You seem to conveniently ignore that.

Shocker.


It's called.....Democrat privilege.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:

DiabloWags said:

BearHunter said:

Relax. We all know the Democrats are cheaters.

Trump was in office for 4 years.
Trump had FOUR YEARS to prosecute Hillary, but never did.
You seem to conveniently ignore that.

Shocker.

It's called.....Democrat privilege.

Or maybe Trump is just part of The Swamp and you havent been able to figure that out yet.
You got FOOLED.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:

DiabloWags said:

BearHunter said:

Relax. We all know the Democrats are cheaters.

Trump was in office for 4 years.
Trump had FOUR YEARS to prosecute Hillary, but never did.
You seem to conveniently ignore that.

Shocker.


It's called.....Democrat White privilege & Supremacy.


Edits in bold.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.