The Economy

27,881 Views | 552 Replies | Last: 24 min ago by DiabloWags
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

It turns out Trump has been faking high jobs numbers in previous reports. July came in at a weak 73k jobs, probably to be revised down in the future following Trump's pattern of fake headline numbers that are better than reality. June was revised down by 133k jobs and May was revised down by 125k jobs. Through the last 3 months Trump's weak economy has generated only 106k jobs.

President Biden averaged about 350k jobs per month, or about 1 million for every 3 month period.

NOTE - I have learned how to report economics from my magat friends.

As I type, S&P 500 futures are down 1% and the 10 year yield has dropped to 4.28%. Trump is probably right that Powell should have lowered interest rates - the economy is weak though the weakness is moving up from the bottom. The top end is still doing well and boosting the stock market and dining out. Corporate media, which is full of people at the top barely know how to look past the stock market anymore.

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm


For context, Biden was president during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that cost millions of Americans jobs.


For context, Biden was President during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that created a great deal of inflation. If Biden is blamed for inflation then he gets credit for the jobs and Trump takes blame for his loss of millions of jobs.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

It turns out Trump has been faking high jobs numbers in previous reports. July came in at a weak 73k jobs, probably to be revised down in the future following Trump's pattern of fake headline numbers that are better than reality. June was revised down by 133k jobs and May was revised down by 125k jobs. Through the last 3 months Trump's weak economy has generated only 106k jobs.

President Biden averaged about 350k jobs per month, or about 1 million for every 3 month period.

NOTE - I have learned how to report economics from my magat friends.

As I type, S&P 500 futures are down 1% and the 10 year yield has dropped to 4.28%. Trump is probably right that Powell should have lowered interest rates - the economy is weak though the weakness is moving up from the bottom. The top end is still doing well and boosting the stock market and dining out. Corporate media, which is full of people at the top barely know how to look past the stock market anymore.

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm


For context, Biden was president during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that cost millions of Americans jobs.


For context, Biden was President during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that created a great deal of inflation. If Biden is blamed for inflation then he gets credit for the jobs and Trump takes blame for his loss of millions of jobs.


Congress and Biden did fine up until the second half of his term when they kept pushing QE even after the reopening.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The current effective tariff rate appears to be around 18%
This will result in a smaller economy.

The tariffs have finally taken a big "bite" into the economy, especially with durable goods.
Uncertainty has consequences.
Just ask any CEO.

"We have the hottest Country in the world," - - - Donald Trump



dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

It turns out Trump has been faking high jobs numbers in previous reports. July came in at a weak 73k jobs, probably to be revised down in the future following Trump's pattern of fake headline numbers that are better than reality. June was revised down by 133k jobs and May was revised down by 125k jobs. Through the last 3 months Trump's weak economy has generated only 106k jobs.

President Biden averaged about 350k jobs per month, or about 1 million for every 3 month period.

NOTE - I have learned how to report economics from my magat friends.

As I type, S&P 500 futures are down 1% and the 10 year yield has dropped to 4.28%. Trump is probably right that Powell should have lowered interest rates - the economy is weak though the weakness is moving up from the bottom. The top end is still doing well and boosting the stock market and dining out. Corporate media, which is full of people at the top barely know how to look past the stock market anymore.

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm


For context, Biden was president during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that cost millions of Americans jobs.


For context, Biden was President during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that created a great deal of inflation. If Biden is blamed for inflation then he gets credit for the jobs and Trump takes blame for his loss of millions of jobs.


Congress and Biden did fine up until the second half of his term when they kept pushing QE even after the reopening.

You are a complete moron that I shouldn't even be bothering with. The Federal Reserve makes determinations about QE. QE peaked in April 2022 with a Federal Reserve balance sheet of $8.965 trillion. The Fed then began QT, reducing the balance sheet to $6.834 trillion by the time President Biden left office. Biden's Presidency was one of Quantitative Tightening. The Fed balance sheet was lower when he left office than when he entered office.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WALCL
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

You are a complete moron that I shouldn't even be bothering with.

You are correct on ALL counts.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

It turns out Trump has been faking high jobs numbers in previous reports. July came in at a weak 73k jobs, probably to be revised down in the future following Trump's pattern of fake headline numbers that are better than reality. June was revised down by 133k jobs and May was revised down by 125k jobs. Through the last 3 months Trump's weak economy has generated only 106k jobs.

President Biden averaged about 350k jobs per month, or about 1 million for every 3 month period.

NOTE - I have learned how to report economics from my magat friends.

As I type, S&P 500 futures are down 1% and the 10 year yield has dropped to 4.28%. Trump is probably right that Powell should have lowered interest rates - the economy is weak though the weakness is moving up from the bottom. The top end is still doing well and boosting the stock market and dining out. Corporate media, which is full of people at the top barely know how to look past the stock market anymore.

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm


For context, Biden was president during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that cost millions of Americans jobs.


For context, Biden was President during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that created a great deal of inflation. If Biden is blamed for inflation then he gets credit for the jobs and Trump takes blame for his loss of millions of jobs.


Congress and Biden did fine up until the second half of his term when they kept pushing QE even after the reopening.

You are a complete moron that I shouldn't even be bothering with. The Federal Reserve makes determinations about QE. QE peaked in April 2022 with a Federal Reserve balance sheet of $8.965 trillion. The Fed then began QT, reducing the balance sheet to $6.834 trillion by the time President Biden left office. Biden's Presidency was one of Quantitative Tightening. The Fed balance sheet was lower when he left office than when he entered office.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WALCL


Thanks for the graph. It was 7.4 trillion when Biden took office. It peaked at 9 trillion in May of 2022. The economy reopened in late 2020 / early 2021. The Fed was cutting rates until late 2024, then Trump took office. The Fed is still doing QT in 2025. Biden reappointed JPow, and I am sure their goals were aligned when Biden chose him to steer QE and interest rates.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

It turns out Trump has been faking high jobs numbers in previous reports. July came in at a weak 73k jobs, probably to be revised down in the future following Trump's pattern of fake headline numbers that are better than reality. June was revised down by 133k jobs and May was revised down by 125k jobs. Through the last 3 months Trump's weak economy has generated only 106k jobs.

President Biden averaged about 350k jobs per month, or about 1 million for every 3 month period.

NOTE - I have learned how to report economics from my magat friends.

As I type, S&P 500 futures are down 1% and the 10 year yield has dropped to 4.28%. Trump is probably right that Powell should have lowered interest rates - the economy is weak though the weakness is moving up from the bottom. The top end is still doing well and boosting the stock market and dining out. Corporate media, which is full of people at the top barely know how to look past the stock market anymore.

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm


For context, Biden was president during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that cost millions of Americans jobs.


For context, Biden was President during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that created a great deal of inflation. If Biden is blamed for inflation then he gets credit for the jobs and Trump takes blame for his loss of millions of jobs.


Congress and Biden did fine up until the second half of his term when they kept pushing QE even after the reopening.

You are a complete moron that I shouldn't even be bothering with. The Federal Reserve makes determinations about QE. QE peaked in April 2022 with a Federal Reserve balance sheet of $8.965 trillion. The Fed then began QT, reducing the balance sheet to $6.834 trillion by the time President Biden left office. Biden's Presidency was one of Quantitative Tightening. The Fed balance sheet was lower when he left office than when he entered office.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WALCL


Thanks for the graph. It was 7.4 trillion when Biden took office. It peaked at 9 trillion in May of 2022. The economy reopened in late 2020 / early 2021. The Fed was cutting rates until late 2024, then Trump took office. The Fed is still doing QT in 2025. Biden reappointed JPow, and I am sure their goals were aligned when Biden chose him to steer QE and interest rates.

Just take the L

Back to blocked
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

It turns out Trump has been faking high jobs numbers in previous reports. July came in at a weak 73k jobs, probably to be revised down in the future following Trump's pattern of fake headline numbers that are better than reality. June was revised down by 133k jobs and May was revised down by 125k jobs. Through the last 3 months Trump's weak economy has generated only 106k jobs.

President Biden averaged about 350k jobs per month, or about 1 million for every 3 month period.

NOTE - I have learned how to report economics from my magat friends.

As I type, S&P 500 futures are down 1% and the 10 year yield has dropped to 4.28%. Trump is probably right that Powell should have lowered interest rates - the economy is weak though the weakness is moving up from the bottom. The top end is still doing well and boosting the stock market and dining out. Corporate media, which is full of people at the top barely know how to look past the stock market anymore.

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm


For context, Biden was president during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that cost millions of Americans jobs.


For context, Biden was President during the reopening of the economy from a pandemic that created a great deal of inflation. If Biden is blamed for inflation then he gets credit for the jobs and Trump takes blame for his loss of millions of jobs.


Congress and Biden did fine up until the second half of his term when they kept pushing QE even after the reopening.

You are a complete moron that I shouldn't even be bothering with. The Federal Reserve makes determinations about QE. QE peaked in April 2022 with a Federal Reserve balance sheet of $8.965 trillion. The Fed then began QT, reducing the balance sheet to $6.834 trillion by the time President Biden left office. Biden's Presidency was one of Quantitative Tightening. The Fed balance sheet was lower when he left office than when he entered office.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WALCL


Thanks for the graph. It was 7.4 trillion when Biden took office. It peaked at 9 trillion in May of 2022. The economy reopened in late 2020 / early 2021. The Fed was cutting rates until late 2024, then Trump took office. The Fed is still doing QT in 2025. Biden reappointed JPow, and I am sure their goals were aligned when Biden chose him to steer QE and interest rates.

Just take the L

Back to blocked


Again, it was 7.4 trillion when Biden took office. It peaked at 9 trillion in May of 2022. The economy reopened in late 2020 / early 2021. The Fed was cutting rates until late 2024, then Trump took office. The Fed is still doing QT in 2025. Biden reappointed JPow, and I am sure their goals were aligned when Biden chose him to steer QE and interest rates.

Thanks.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

It peaked at 9 trillion in May of 2022.

Wrong.

The chart clearly shows that Total Assets at the Federal Reserve peaked in April of 2022
April 13th to be exact at $8.965 trillion.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Just take the L

Back to blocked


oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

It peaked at 9 trillion in May of 2022.

Wrong.

The chart clearly shows that Total Assets at the Federal Reserve peaked in April of 2022
April 13th to be exact at $8.965 trillion.



That's fine. It was still 8.946 in May after dropping to 8.939 in late April.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

The Fed is still doing QT in 2025.


For context, while the Fed is technically still conducting QT, they slowed the pace of its balance sheet drawdown in April. The prior QT monthly cap for Treasuries was $25 Billion per month. It was reduced to $5 Billion per month, effective April 1st.

Many market participants viewed this slowdown in QT resting entirely on Treasuries, as a "soft" form of a complete stop.

Moreover, should the U.S. Treasury shift more of its refunding to Treasury Bills (as opposed to Treasury Bonds) this would in essence be a "stealth" QE given that the supply of bonds would be reduced.

Context is important.

Thanks.

Fed says it will slow balance sheet runoff process | Reuters



BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

This is not an "anomaly" as White House economist Stephen Miran just said on CNN.

This is the beginning of a bad stretch of jobs numbers via the tariffs and deportation.

258,000 fewer jobs in May and June due to revisions.

Hiring fell to a 12-month low.

The CME Fed Funds Tool just saw a surge to 82.2% for a September 1/4 point rate cut.

Professional and business services lost 14,000 jobs, manufacturing shed 11,000 and leisure and hospitality (including restaurants and bars) added just 5,000.

For months, private-sector job creation has been concentrated in health care, leisure and hospitality and little else.

Can't wait for the usual "cheerleaders" here to get their Twitter talking points from their Masters and SPIN this.






The effects of the tariffs are just beginning and we are headed into bad waters. By the time we reach October, November, and December I picture a dumpster fire.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

The effects of the tariffs are just beginning and we are headed into bad waters. By the time we reach October, November, and December I picture a dumpster fire.

It's quite possible.

You don't have to be a "rocket-scientist" to look underneath the hood of this economy and see that there isn't any kind of general expansion in activity across the economy.

For example, just look at which sectors produced job creation in July:

Health Care added 55,000 jobs.
This is above the average monthly gain of 42,000 over the prior 12-months

Social Assistance employment added 18,000 jobs.

Conclusion:

73,000 JOBS WERE ADDED IN JULY.

73,000 OF THEM CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO TWO LOW PRODUCTIVITY SECTORS THAT INCREASE MECHANICALLY ALMOST EVERY MONTH, AS SOCIETY GETS MORE OLD.

Everything else is stalling at best.
And without Health Care, the last 3 months of job gains would look like this:

-53,000 in May
-45,000 in June
-300 in July

So the only areas of actual widespread jobs growth is occuring in areas that are tied to aging and health, much of which is sustained by widening deficit spending.

This is not a good recipe for "growth" of the "Hottest Country in the World"

Only a moron would make that claim.






DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2-year yields are down sharply as expected.
About 21-basis points. As a result, the odds of a rate cut have in September have now soared to 88% from 40%.

But the 10-year yield is down about 15 basis points.

This tells us that over the long-term, conditions still warrant elevated interest rates, even if we're in a moment of stall.

In fact, this is the big problem for both the Fed and the White House.

If the goal is to revive the housing market or to reduce interest payments on the debt I (which Trump is interested in), it's not clear that we're going to get much juice from the squeeze on rate cuts given how the long-end of the curve is behaving. This is why rate cuts have very little impact on mortgage rates.

With Core PCE at 2.8%, I'd say that today's report makes it easy to envision an environment of STAGFLATION.


SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Just take the L

Back to blocked




The L has been bequethed!

MAGAts, performing the 3 card monte on the American people

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever

Go Bears Forever
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearNIt said:

The effects of the tariffs are just beginning and we are headed into bad waters. By the time we reach October, November, and December I picture a dumpster fire.

It's quite possible.

You don't have to be a "rocket-scientist" to look underneath the hood of this economy and see that there isn't any kind of general expansion in activity across the economy.

For example, just look at which sectors produced job creation in July:

Health Care added 55,000 jobs.
This is above the average monthly gain of 42,000 over the prior 12-months

Social Assistance employment added 18,000 jobs.

Conclusion:

73,000 JOBS WERE ADDED IN JULY AND 73,000 OF THEM CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO TWO LOW PRODUCTIVITY SECTORS THAT INCREASE MECHANICALLY ALMOST EVERY MONTH, AS SOCIETY GETS MORE OLD.

Everything else is stalling at best.
And without Health Care, the last 3 months of job gains would look like this:

-53,000 in May
-45,000 in June
-300 in July

So the only areas of actual widespread jobs growth is occuring in areas that are tied to aging and health, much of which is sustained by widening deficit spending.

This is not a good recipe for "growth" of the "Hottest Country in the World"

Only a moron would make that claim.



Remember, the original jobs releases for May and June are Trump's economy. The revisions are Biden's economy.




dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Just take the L

Back to blocked




The L has been bequethed!

MAGAts, performing the 3 card monte on the American people

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever

Go Bears Forever

The L will belong to all of us as Trump calls for the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to be fired for having the temerity to release real numbers that are bad. What happens to U.S. capital markets when the numbers behind them lose integrity?

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/01/trump-erika-mcentarfer-jobs-report-fired.html
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

SBGold said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Just take the L

Back to blocked




The L has been bequethed!

MAGAts, performing the 3 card monte on the American people

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever

Go Bears Forever

The L will belong to all of us as Trump calls for the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to be fired for having the temerity to release real numbers that are bad. What happens to U.S. capital markets when the numbers behind them lose integrity?

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/01/trump-erika-mcentarfer-jobs-report-fired.html


The integrity of the data is ALREADY suspect given the massive Federal layoffs and hiring freezes in agencies like BLS which rely heavily on the ability to perform surveys through Field Operations called enumerators.

If the enumerators can't find a specific product in a certain city, they record the price of a comparable product for a next-best estimate. Having fewer workers in the field means the BLS has to rely more than usual on its next-best estimates.

"BLS makes reductions when current resources can no longer support the collection effort. BLS will continue to evaluate survey operations," the BLS wrote in a statement earlier this month.


https://fortune.com/2025/06/13/bls-data-federal-reserve-cpi-employment/

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WELCOME TO DUMBERICA!


movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

WELCOME TO DUMBERICA!





Biden political appointees rigging the numbers?

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump thinks he can rig everything. He only miscalculated once, the 2020 Election. He will never err on the side of caution again when it comes to rigging.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

DiabloWags said:

WELCOME TO DUMBERICA!





Biden political appointees rigging the numbers?




You seldom cease to amaze me with your absurd interpretation of events.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

SBGold said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Just take the L

Back to blocked




The L has been bequethed!

MAGAts, performing the 3 card monte on the American people

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever

Go Bears Forever

The L will belong to all of us as Trump calls for the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to be fired for having the temerity to release real numbers that are bad. What happens to U.S. capital markets when the numbers behind them lose integrity?

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/01/trump-erika-mcentarfer-jobs-report-fired.html


Easy.
Trump will take them over too and raid whatever assets they have left.

He will blackmail stock listings as unified head of NYSE and Nasdaq.
Remember SEC is an executive branch department.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?

movielover said:

Biden political appointees rigging the numbers?


concordtom said:

You seldom cease to amaze me with your absurd interpretation of events.


Tom, given his posting he strikes me as a very sick individual.
Needs professional help. But I have a feeling that his Medicaid or ACA subsidy is about to run out.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearNIt said:

The effects of the tariffs are just beginning and we are headed into bad waters. By the time we reach October, November, and December I picture a dumpster fire.

It's quite possible.

You don't have to be a "rocket-scientist" to look underneath the hood of this economy and see that there isn't any kind of general expansion in activity across the economy.

For example, just look at which sectors produced job creation in July:

Health Care added 55,000 jobs.
This is above the average monthly gain of 42,000 over the prior 12-months

Social Assistance employment added 18,000 jobs.

Conclusion:

73,000 JOBS WERE ADDED IN JULY.

73,000 OF THEM CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO TWO LOW PRODUCTIVITY SECTORS THAT INCREASE MECHANICALLY ALMOST EVERY MONTH, AS SOCIETY GETS MORE OLD.

Everything else is stalling at best.
And without Health Care, the last 3 months of job gains would look like this:

-53,000 in May
-45,000 in June
-300 in July

So the only areas of actual widespread jobs growth is occuring in areas that are tied to aging and health, much of which is sustained by widening deficit spending.

This is not a good recipe for "growth" of the "Hottest Country in the World"

Only a moron would make that claim.








I know for a fact that healthcare could add more jobs were it not for the cuts in Medicaid which have put a hold on everything and frozen budgets.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

WELCOME TO DUMBERICA!




Yup, he canned her. This is a banana republic at this point

MAGAts, you idiots gave us a bunch of losers in government

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:


movielover said:

Biden political appointees rigging the numbers?


concordtom said:

You seldom cease to amaze me with your absurd interpretation of events.


Tom, given his posting he strikes me as a very sick individual.
Needs professional help. But I have a feeling that his Medicaid or ACA subsidy is about to run out.

An absolute moron at the highest of moronic levels.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:




Straight from the Authoritarian handbook:

"Hitler was known to dismiss or sideline generals who offered advice or reports that contradicted his own often flawed strategic and operational judgments,especially as the war progressed and Germany faced increasing setbacks.

As the war turned against Germany, particularly following the failed July Plot in 1944, Hitler grew increasingly paranoid and distrustful of his generals, seeing any divergence from his own views as potential disloyalty."*



* Trump administration firings mount as staffers' loyalty is called into question - POLITICO

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/01/trump-firings-loomer-00488070
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Reductio ad Hitlerum.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Reductio ad Hitlerum.
As opposed to
Reductio ad Bidenum
Reductio ad Obamaum
Reductio ad Hillaryum
Reductio ad Kamalaum
Reductio ad AOCum
Reductio ad Newsomum
Reductio ad Immigrantsum
Reductio ad Democratsum
Reductio ad Muslimum
Reductio ad Etc...um
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Reductio ad Hitlerum.

This reminds me of Hitler firing his Generals towards the end of the War.
The only difference here is that the trade war just started.

I have a feeling a lot of people are gonna be fired over the next year.

Welcome to Chumpmerica!

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.