PAC-10-BEAR said:
Who's more obsessed with Nazi symbols? Bearister or the U.S. funded, Ukraine Azov brigade?
Definitely the former
ICE
134,283 Views |
2722 Replies |
Last: 1 day ago by Eastern Oregon Bear
Definitely the former
Dear RACIST white liberals…
— Xaviaer DuRousseau (@XAVIAERD) January 26, 2026
ICE is not a black person’s problem. https://t.co/80tBx7yyhA pic.twitter.com/0xqPK9i144
Preach!!!!!!!
BearlySane88 said:Dear RACIST white liberals…
— Xaviaer DuRousseau (@XAVIAERD) January 26, 2026
ICE is not a black person’s problem. https://t.co/80tBx7yyhA pic.twitter.com/0xqPK9i144
Preach!!!!!!!
"For once, the cops are coming after somebody besides us, so I think I'll just sit this one out, thank you very much."
"If Alex Pretti had been Black, they wouldn't have stopped at a measly ten bullets. Maybe after a longer beating, though."
"If Renee Good had been Black, they woulda shot her ass while she was still in reverse."
ICE has proven that, no matter what color you are, if you are doing stupid stuff and don't know how to behave around law enforcement, you can get shot.
How ironic that many Trumpers no longer care about the 2nd and 10th Amendment anymore.
These are the same people that tell us not to bring a gun to a protest, but conveniiently forget about Kyle Rittenhouse.
Shocker.
These are the same people that tell us not to bring a gun to a protest, but conveniiently forget about Kyle Rittenhouse.
Shocker.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
DiabloWags said:
How ironic that many Trumpers no longer care about the 2nd and 10th Amendment anymore.
These are the same people that tell us not to bring a gun to a protest, but conveniiently forget about Kyle Rittenhouse.
Shocker.
They actually do. Your post is a clear example of black and white thinking with poor analytics.
Poor analytics?
Or poor reading comprehension?
It's been proven to be the latter.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Big C said:BearlySane88 said:Dear RACIST white liberals…
— Xaviaer DuRousseau (@XAVIAERD) January 26, 2026
ICE is not a black person’s problem. https://t.co/80tBx7yyhA pic.twitter.com/0xqPK9i144
Preach!!!!!!!
"For once, the cops are coming after somebody besides us, so I think I'll just sit this one out, thank you very much."
"If Alex Pretti had been Black, they wouldn't have stopped at a measly ten bullets. Maybe after a longer beating, though."
"If Renee Good had been Black, they woulda shot her ass while she was still in reverse."
Sounds like you didn't listen to what he said at all
DiabloWags said:
Poor analytics?
Or poor reading comprehension?
It's been proven to be the latter.
Yes, your post is also an example of poor reading comprehension. For example, Rittenhouse immediately and openly surrendered his weapon when he encountered law enforcement.
DiabloWags said:
How ironic that many Trumpers no longer care about the 2nd and 10th Amendment anymore.
These are the same people that tell us not to bring a gun to a protest, but conveniiently forget about Kyle Rittenhouse.
Shocker.
You've said this a couple times now and I've responded. Unfortunately for you, you choose to ignore voices you don't agree with and have missed my responses and a chance to learn instead of assuming you know everything
oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
How ironic that many Trumpers no longer care about the 2nd and 10th Amendment anymore.
These are the same people that tell us not to bring a gun to a protest, but conveniiently forget about Kyle Rittenhouse.
Shocker.
They actually do. Your post is a clear example of black and white thinking with poor analytics.
Bingo.
….and don't forget that there is an exemption to bringing an AR-15 to a demonstration as long as you shoot a commie b@stard.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
Poor analytics?
Or poor reading comprehension?
It's been proven to be the latter.
Yes, your post is also an example of poor reading comprehension. For example, Rittenhouse immediately and openly surrendered his weapon when he encountered law enforcement.
FACT:
Alex Pretti had a permit to carry, was disarmed, was not resisting arrest, was surrounded by 6 agents and yet he was still shot 10 times.
I've seen Trumpers repeatedly claim on social media that you shouldn't carry a fire arm to a protest.
And yet they call out Alex Pretti for doing so.
And look the other way for Kyle Rittenhouse.
That's called being a HYPOCRITE.
For some reason, this point escapes you.
Im not really surprised.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Who's more obsessed with Nazi symbols? Bearister or the U.S. funded, Ukraine Azov brigade?
I'd say it is the Trump Administration employee with the Waffen-SS fade and the Eastern Front winter coat.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
ADAM CAROLLA: “If my kid was like, ‘I’m gonna go out and antagonize ICE officers,’ I’d be like, ‘Can’t you just get on that nice Honda 125 I just bought you, do a few hot laps around town?’
— Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) January 26, 2026
“Here’s what I wanna say to everyone. You are relying on these people to do something… pic.twitter.com/GrpyHwKv6T
bearister said:PAC-10-BEAR said:
Who's more obsessed with Nazi symbols? Bearister or the U.S. funded, Ukraine Azov brigade?
I'd say it is the Trump Administration employee with the Waffen-SS fade and the Eastern Front winter coat.
Nah definitely you. Nobody talks about Nazis more than liberals
DiabloWags said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
Poor analytics?
Or poor reading comprehension?
It's been proven to be the latter.
Yes, your post is also an example of poor reading comprehension. For example, Rittenhouse immediately and openly surrendered his weapon when he encountered law enforcement.
FACT:
Alex Pretti had a permit to carry, was disarmed, was not resisting arrest, was surrounded by 6 agents and yet he was still shot 10 times.
I've seen Trumpers repeatedly claim on social media that you shouldn't carry a fire arm to a protest.
And yet they call out Alex Pretti for doing so.
And look the other way for Kyle Rittenhouse.
That's called being a HYPOCRITE.
For some reason, this point escapes you.
Im not really surprised.
Again, you don't listen when people try to explain things to you. Your mind is so closed off that you don't take the time process what someone tells you if it doesn't match your preconceived notion of what should be said.
bearister said:
….and don't forget that there is an exemption to bringing an AR-15 to a demonstration as long as you shoot a commie b@stard.
Bring them all you want, just don't put yourself in a position of conflict with LEOs.
DiabloWags said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
Poor analytics?
Or poor reading comprehension?
It's been proven to be the latter.
Yes, your post is also an example of poor reading comprehension. For example, Rittenhouse immediately and openly surrendered his weapon when he encountered law enforcement.
FACT:
Alex Pretti had a permit to carry, was disarmed, was not resisting arrest, was surrounded by 6 agents and yet he was still shot 10 times.
I've seen Trumpers repeatedly claim on social media that you shouldn't carry a fire arm to a protest.
And yet they call out Alex Pretti for doing so.
That's called being a HYPOCRITE.
For some reason, this point escapes you.
Yes, it is mind boggling that you think it takes 47+ days to train to make a pizza. It is also mind boggling that you think it is not dangerous to wear a concealed handgun and interfere with law enforcement doing their job and then put hands on them. Using all caps certainly doesn't improve your arguments.
BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
Poor analytics?
Or poor reading comprehension?
It's been proven to be the latter.
Yes, your post is also an example of poor reading comprehension. For example, Rittenhouse immediately and openly surrendered his weapon when he encountered law enforcement.
FACT:
Alex Pretti had a permit to carry, was disarmed, was not resisting arrest, was surrounded by 6 agents and yet he was still shot 10 times.
I've seen Trumpers repeatedly claim on social media that you shouldn't carry a fire arm to a protest.
And yet they call out Alex Pretti for doing so.
And look the other way for Kyle Rittenhouse.
That's called being a HYPOCRITE.
For some reason, this point escapes you.
Im not really surprised.
Again, you don't listen when people try to explain things to you. Your mind is so closed off that you don't take the time process what someone tells you if it doesn't match your preconceived notion of what should be said.
Your reading comprehension is poor.
Let me spell it out one more time for you.
I was clearly making a point about the hypocrites who have told us that Alex Pretti should not have brought a fire arm to a protest. Even our Treasury Secretary said this. But many Trump supporters were cool with Kyle Rittenhouse doing the same.
That was my point.
Period.
I hope that helps you with comprehending my post.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
One reason we're only seeing tepid participation from the usual BLM crowd joining the anti-ICE chaos in MN?
— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) January 26, 2026
Mass immigration has hit working-class Black communities hard.
We haven't yet, and likely won't, see a strong BLM-style rally against border enforcement anytime soon.
DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
Poor analytics?
Or poor reading comprehension?
It's been proven to be the latter.
Yes, your post is also an example of poor reading comprehension. For example, Rittenhouse immediately and openly surrendered his weapon when he encountered law enforcement.
FACT:
Alex Pretti had a permit to carry, was disarmed, was not resisting arrest, was surrounded by 6 agents and yet he was still shot 10 times.
I've seen Trumpers repeatedly claim on social media that you shouldn't carry a fire arm to a protest.
And yet they call out Alex Pretti for doing so.
And look the other way for Kyle Rittenhouse.
That's called being a HYPOCRITE.
For some reason, this point escapes you.
Im not really surprised.
Again, you don't listen when people try to explain things to you. Your mind is so closed off that you don't take the time process what someone tells you if it doesn't match your preconceived notion of what should be said.
Your reading comprehension is poor.
Let me spell it out one more time for you.
I was clearly making a point about the hypocrites who have told us that Alex Pretti should not have brought a fire arm to a protest. Even our Treasury Secretary said this. But they were cool with Kyle Rittenhouse doing the same.
That was my point.
Period.
I hope that helps you with comprehending my post. If not, you should probably put me on IGNORE or stop replying to my posts. My points seem to confuse you and awful lot.
No, what Pretti shouldn't have done was engage unlawfully with DHS while carrying. Protest with your fire arm all you want if that's the risk you're willing to take. Rittenhouse immediately surrendered to LEOs and didn't put his hands on them aggressively. That's the difference. Both were stupid, one a lot less stupid and he's still alive.
Your points aren't confusing, they just aren't very good.
BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
Poor analytics?
Or poor reading comprehension?
It's been proven to be the latter.
Yes, your post is also an example of poor reading comprehension. For example, Rittenhouse immediately and openly surrendered his weapon when he encountered law enforcement.
FACT:
Alex Pretti had a permit to carry, was disarmed, was not resisting arrest, was surrounded by 6 agents and yet he was still shot 10 times.
I've seen Trumpers repeatedly claim on social media that you shouldn't carry a fire arm to a protest.
And yet they call out Alex Pretti for doing so.
And look the other way for Kyle Rittenhouse.
That's called being a HYPOCRITE.
For some reason, this point escapes you.
Im not really surprised.
Again, you don't listen when people try to explain things to you. Your mind is so closed off that you don't take the time process what someone tells you if it doesn't match your preconceived notion of what should be said.
Your reading comprehension is poor.
Let me spell it out one more time for you.
I was clearly making a point about the hypocrites who have told us that Alex Pretti should not have brought a fire arm to a protest. Even our Treasury Secretary said this. But they were cool with Kyle Rittenhouse doing the same.
That was my point.
Period.
I hope that helps you with comprehending my post. If not, you should probably put me on IGNORE or stop replying to my posts. My points seem to confuse you and awful lot.
No, what Pretti shouldn't have done was engage unlawfully with DHS while carrying. Protest with your fire arm all you want if that's the risk you're willing to take. Rittenhouse immediately surrendered to LEOs and didn't put his hands on them aggressively. That's the difference. Both were stupid, one a lot less stupid and he's still alive.
Your points aren't confusing, they just aren't very good.
No, you just don't want to ACCEPT the hypocrisy at work here. Im not surprised at all by that.
But for some strange reason, you are also ACCEPTING of an unarmed U.S. citizen being gunned down who poses no threat, was not in the act of commiting a crime, and who was not resisting arrest.
Your posts indicate you don't have a problem with that.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
It's not even that they were protesting...going to an active federal enforcement action to disrupt it, isn't protesting. They essentially have a secret government operating in the background to disrupt federal law enforcement.
MinotStateBeav said:
It's not even that they were protesting...going to an active federal enforcement action to disrupt it, isn't protesting. They essentially have a secret government operating in the background to disrupt federal law enforcement.
Are you related to Stephen Miller by chance?
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
Poor analytics?
Or poor reading comprehension?
It's been proven to be the latter.
Yes, your post is also an example of poor reading comprehension. For example, Rittenhouse immediately and openly surrendered his weapon when he encountered law enforcement.
FACT:
Alex Pretti had a permit to carry, was disarmed, was not resisting arrest, was surrounded by 6 agents and yet he was still shot 10 times.
I've seen Trumpers repeatedly claim on social media that you shouldn't carry a fire arm to a protest.
And yet they call out Alex Pretti for doing so.
And look the other way for Kyle Rittenhouse.
That's called being a HYPOCRITE.
For some reason, this point escapes you.
Im not really surprised.
Again, you don't listen when people try to explain things to you. Your mind is so closed off that you don't take the time process what someone tells you if it doesn't match your preconceived notion of what should be said.
Your reading comprehension is poor.
Let me spell it out one more time for you.
I was clearly making a point about the hypocrites who have told us that Alex Pretti should not have brought a fire arm to a protest. Even our Treasury Secretary said this. But they were cool with Kyle Rittenhouse doing the same.
That was my point.
Period.
I hope that helps you with comprehending my post. If not, you should probably put me on IGNORE or stop replying to my posts. My points seem to confuse you and awful lot.
No, what Pretti shouldn't have done was engage unlawfully with DHS while carrying. Protest with your fire arm all you want if that's the risk you're willing to take. Rittenhouse immediately surrendered to LEOs and didn't put his hands on them aggressively. That's the difference. Both were stupid, one a lot less stupid and he's still alive.
Your points aren't confusing, they just aren't very good.
No, you just don't want to ACCEPT the hypocrisy at work here. Im not surprised at all by that.
But for some strange reason, you are also ACCEPTING of an unarmed U.S. citizen being gunned down who poses no threat, was not in the act of commiting a crime, and who was not resisting arrest.
Your posts indicate you don't have a problem with that.
There's no hypocrisy. One engaged with LEOs while armed. One didn't. Not sure what you're not getting there.
I've said over and over that it's very said Pretti was killed. He did commit a crime when he put hands on an LEO and he absolutely was resisting, also a crime. Your "moral" high ground doesn't work when you choose to change the facts
DiabloWags said:MinotStateBeav said:
It's not even that they were protesting...going to an active federal enforcement action to disrupt it, isn't protesting. They essentially have a secret government operating in the background to disrupt federal law enforcement.
Are you related to Stephen Miller by chance?
I know who you're related to.
I don't need to change the facts.
I think that most Americans believe Alex Pretti was murdered. That's all that really matters.
And I have no doubt that will be a big problem for the GOP come midterms.
I think that most Americans believe Alex Pretti was murdered. That's all that really matters.
And I have no doubt that will be a big problem for the GOP come midterms.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
DiabloWags said:
I don't need to change the facts.
I think that most Americans believe Alex Pretti was murdered. That's all that really matters.
You've changed the facts several times. You claimed he was restrained and posted a picture showing he clearly wasn't restrained. You said he wasn't resisting when he clearly was resisting. You said he didn't commit a crime when he in fact committed several by putting hands on an LEO and resisting.
You probably guaranteed Trump wouldn't get elected again also
If you don't value my posts, why are you repeatedly replying to them?
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
DiabloWags said:
If you don't value my posts, why are you repeatedly replying?
Because it's a public message board and that's what people do on public message boards. Same reason anyone else on here responds to others they don't agree with.
BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:
If you don't value my posts, why are you repeatedly replying?
Because it's a public message board and that's what people do on public message boards. Same reason anyone else on here responds to others they don't agree with.
Im sorry, but my time is more valuable than that.
I have no desire to post 200x in 16 hours as others have noted here. - - - Like Trump, you seem to take everything very personally.
I guess its time for me to use the ignore feature again, even though its not an absolute ignore. I'm not interested in your opinion or our mascots. It offers no value to me. It really doesn't.
Life is short.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:
If you don't value my posts, why are you repeatedly replying?
Because it's a public message board and that's what people do on public message boards. Same reason anyone else on here responds to others they don't agree with.
Im sorry, but my time is more valuable than that.
I have no desire to post 200x in 16 hours as others have noted here. - - - Like Trump, you seem to take everything very personally.
I guess its time for me to use the ignore feature again, even though its not an absolute ignore. I'm not interested in your opinion or our mascots. It offers no value to me. It really doesn't.
Life is short.
You're getting hosed right now and your immediate response is to ignore. Seems like you might be the one taking it personally.
You responded to nothing I said and just continued to repeat the same thing over and over again. Conversations with you are just you making yourself feel good while ignoring facts presented to you.
"The NRA labelled a suggestion by a federal prosecutor that people who carry guns risk being lawfully shot by officers as "dangerous and wrong".
NRA and other US gun activists push back at Trump officials over Minneapolis shooting https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cnvg812n01no
The NRA may not have supported the Panthers right to bear arms when the Mulford Act was enacted in California in 1967, but dag nabbit, they sure are going to lean hard into the right to pack a permitted carried pistola to a demonstration, because you never know when some commie b@stard like Gavin Newsom becomes POTUS and an Idaho militia wants to demonstrate against one of his Pinko policies and bring their Glocks.
NRA and other US gun activists push back at Trump officials over Minneapolis shooting https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cnvg812n01no
The NRA may not have supported the Panthers right to bear arms when the Mulford Act was enacted in California in 1967, but dag nabbit, they sure are going to lean hard into the right to pack a permitted carried pistola to a demonstration, because you never know when some commie b@stard like Gavin Newsom becomes POTUS and an Idaho militia wants to demonstrate against one of his Pinko policies and bring their Glocks.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bearister said:
"The NRA labelled a suggestion by a federal prosecutor that people who carry guns risk being lawfully shot by officers as "dangerous and wrong".
NRA and other US gun activists push back at Trump officials over Minneapolis shooting https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cnvg812n01no
The NRA may not have supported the Panthers right to bear arms when the Mulford Act was enacted in California in 1967, but dag nabbit, they sure are going to lean hard into the right to pack a permitted carried pistola to a demonstration, because you never know when some commie like Gavin Newsom becomes POTUS and an Idaho militia wants to demonstrate against one of his Pinko policies and bring their Glocks.
No, people who carry guns and put hands on LEOs risk being lawfully shot.
Featured Stories
See All
Cal Makes Postseason Return, Hosts NIT Action At Haas
by Cal Athletics
The Pre Post Season Mens Basketball Update
by Bear Insider
Cal Football Recruiting Focus: 2027 Running Backs
by Jim McGill
Cal Earns At-Large Bid To WBIT
by Cal Athletics