sycasey said:ICE is detaining and deporting law-abiding immigrants who show up to scheduled procedural check-ins, because that’s the easiest way to boost its numbers. The result is a totally irrational immigration regime, where the more you follow the rules, the more danger you are in. https://t.co/P59CNzeopS
— Will Stancil (@whstancil) May 27, 2025
sycasey said:4-year-old Bakersfield girl facing deportation could die within days of losing medical care https://t.co/1oz5ggIEiY
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) May 27, 2025
oski003 said:sycasey said:4-year-old Bakersfield girl facing deportation could die within days of losing medical care https://t.co/1oz5ggIEiY
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) May 27, 2025
It costs $300,000 to $500,000 a year to treat short bowel syndrome in a young child. Can Mexico really not treat this? Is Mexico giving us money for her care? I don't agree with deporting her, but I also don't understand why Democrats brought her and her family here.
sycasey said:oski003 said:sycasey said:4-year-old Bakersfield girl facing deportation could die within days of losing medical care https://t.co/1oz5ggIEiY
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) May 27, 2025
It costs $300,000 to $500,000 a year to treat short bowel syndrome in a young child. Can Mexico really not treat this? Is Mexico giving us money for her care? I don't agree with deporting her, but I also don't understand why Democrats brought her and her family here.
Read the article. Apparently no, she could not get this treatment in Mexico.
Because we pay for this for free. We are the world's savior.sycasey said:oski003 said:sycasey said:4-year-old Bakersfield girl facing deportation could die within days of losing medical care https://t.co/1oz5ggIEiY
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) May 27, 2025
It costs $300,000 to $500,000 a year to treat short bowel syndrome in a young child. Can Mexico really not treat this? Is Mexico giving us money for her care? I don't agree with deporting her, but I also don't understand why Democrats brought her and her family here.
Read the article. Apparently no, she could not get this treatment in Mexico.
tequila4kapp said:Because we pay for this for free. We are the world's savior.sycasey said:oski003 said:sycasey said:4-year-old Bakersfield girl facing deportation could die within days of losing medical care https://t.co/1oz5ggIEiY
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) May 27, 2025
It costs $300,000 to $500,000 a year to treat short bowel syndrome in a young child. Can Mexico really not treat this? Is Mexico giving us money for her care? I don't agree with deporting her, but I also don't understand why Democrats brought her and her family here.
Read the article. Apparently no, she could not get this treatment in Mexico.
I agree. My comment was meant to be in the spirit of micro/macro. I seriously doubt anyone would object to helping this little girl but for the backdrop of giving away so much to so many, quite often people who are here illegally.sycasey said:I really don't mind letting in someone who genuinely needs help like this. Seems like the parents just want to work and provide for their kid. I thought the point was ot get rid of scammers and criminals?tequila4kapp said:
Because we pay for this for free. We are the world's savior.
They care more about DIEversity photos than protecting children.
— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) May 29, 2025
Meanwhile Islamic rape gangs still run free as they virtue signal!
pic.twitter.com/V2OcSZuJaA
DiabloWags said:
Can't answer a simple question and goes off to push more orange "Kool-Aid" about DEI.
Shocker.
🚨BREAKING: Massive ICE raid taking place in Tallahassee.
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) May 29, 2025
I voted for this.
pic.twitter.com/C3QWNvLnZI
ICE just did a massive illegal migrant bust on a construction site in Tallahassee pic.twitter.com/56bBiIpjXp
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) May 29, 2025
Look how many people too, it's literally their entire construction crew. This was never about filling in employment gaps. This is about using the cheapest labor in order to gain an advantage on the competition, however it just makes it so every competitor does it too. So instead of americans being able to use a labor shortage for increased wages, they get taken out of the entire sector.tequila4kapp said:
It is indefensible to have illegals doing this work. Trump is winning so hard on this issue.
MinotStateBeav said:Look how many people too, it's literally their entire construction crew. This was never about filling in employment gaps. This is about using the cheapest labor in order to gain an advantage on the competition, however it just makes it so every competitor does it too. So instead of americans being able to use a labor shortage for increased wages, they get taken out of the entire sector.tequila4kapp said:
It is indefensible to have illegals doing this work. Trump is winning so hard on this issue.
This is the dirty little secret. People like to tell us Illegals are only taking the jobs American's won't do like landscaping, hotel cleaning crews and picking fruit. It is simply not true.MinotStateBeav said:tequila4kapp said:
Look how many people too, it's literally their entire construction crew. This was never about filling in employment gaps. This is about using the cheapest labor in order to gain an advantage on the competition, however it just makes it so every competitor does it too. So instead of americans being able to use a labor shortage for increased wages, they get taken out of the entire sector.
MinotStateBeav said:Look how many people too, it's literally their entire construction crew. This was never about filling in employment gaps. This is about using the cheapest labor in order to gain an advantage on the competition, however it just makes it so every competitor does it too. So instead of americans being able to use a labor shortage for increased wages, they get taken out of the entire sector.tequila4kapp said:
It is indefensible to have illegals doing this work. Trump is winning so hard on this issue.
bear2034 said:
It's 2025 and the Democrats still don't know what the difference is between legal and illegal immigration.
sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
This plan simply does not make sense, as immigrants and their children have been swingy electoral groups in recent years. You guys are too deep down the conspiracy rabbit hole.movielover said:sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
It's a big game. The UniParty and Wall Street want an unlimited supply of cheap labor, and Democrats want to rig elections for decades (including Amnesty).
sycasey said:This plan simply does not make sense, as immigrants and their children have been swingy electoral groups in recent years. You guys are too deep down the conspiracy rabbit hole.movielover said:It's a big game. The UniParty and Wall Street want an unlimited supply of cheap labor, and Democrats want to rig elections for decades (including Amnesty).sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
If that's the plan then it doesn't work.bear2034 said:sycasey said:This plan simply does not make sense, as immigrants and their children have been swingy electoral groups in recent years. You guys are too deep down the conspiracy rabbit hole.movielover said:It's a big game. The UniParty and Wall Street want an unlimited supply of cheap labor, and Democrats want to rig elections for decades (including Amnesty).sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
Movielover is right. The entire point of allowing immigrants to enter the country illegally is to win elections.
Sycasey's post is precisely the kind of common sense approach people from both sides should be able to agree on. We are a nation of immigrants. We should promote legal immigration. We should halt the nonsense we've seen lately from D's and globalist R's of gaming the system to benefit their fat cat donors who want the cheap labor for even higher profits.movielover said:It's a big game. The UniParty and Wall Street want an unlimited supply of cheap labor, and Democrats want to rig elections for decades (including Amnesty).sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
Democrats abandoned the middle class and blue collar Americans for POC and unlimited illegal immigration, rigged voter roles, elections, etc.
We allow over one million legal residents entry per year, plus various visas, H1B visas, student viseas, etc.
The UniParty and MSM also lie about the true illegal immigrant count which is easily somewhere between 35 and 50 million. (Ivy League academic research estimate + Autopen importing 10-21 million more.)
If you tell Americans we have, say, 45 million illegal immigrants, 300,000 missing children, the average uneducated illiterate illegal immigrant costing us $800K to $1 million per treaspasser, etc., they likely would demand serious policies and actions. They don't want that. They want short term fixes, corporate American wants its next quarter to look good.
Just like Ukraine. They won't tell us there are 1.2 to 1.3 million dead Ukrainians, 200K plus amputees, no hope of winning, etc. They want $$$ and control and MIC games.
And why are we spending $1 Trillion per year on military, 400 - 700 military bases around the world?
Insanity.
Okay, but the influx of illegals still helps Ds. @20% of CA's population are illegals. That means CA gets about 10 extra members in Congress. They are virtually all D's.sycasey said:This plan simply does not make sense, as immigrants and their children have been swingy electoral groups in recent years. You guys are too deep down the conspiracy rabbit hole.movielover said:It's a big game. The UniParty and Wall Street want an unlimited supply of cheap labor, and Democrats want to rig elections for decades (including Amnesty).sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
How does this apply to another border state like Texas?tequila4kapp said:Okay, but the influx of illegals still helps Ds. @20% of CA's population are illegals. That means CA gets about 10 extra members in Congress. They are virtually all D's.sycasey said:This plan simply does not make sense, as immigrants and their children have been swingy electoral groups in recent years. You guys are too deep down the conspiracy rabbit hole.movielover said:It's a big game. The UniParty and Wall Street want an unlimited supply of cheap labor, and Democrats want to rig elections for decades (including Amnesty).sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
tequila4kapp said:Sycasey's post is precisely the kind of common sense approach people from both sides should be able to agree on. We are a nation of immigrants. We should promote legal immigration. We should halt the nonsense we've seen lately from D's and globalist R's of gaming the system to benefit their fat cat donors who want the cheap labor for even higher profits.movielover said:It's a big game. The UniParty and Wall Street want an unlimited supply of cheap labor, and Democrats want to rig elections for decades (including Amnesty).sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
Democrats abandoned the middle class and blue collar Americans for POC and unlimited illegal immigration, rigged voter roles, elections, etc.
We allow over one million legal residents entry per year, plus various visas, H1B visas, student viseas, etc.
The UniParty and MSM also lie about the true illegal immigrant count which is easily somewhere between 35 and 50 million. (Ivy League academic research estimate + Autopen importing 10-21 million more.)
If you tell Americans we have, say, 45 million illegal immigrants, 300,000 missing children, the average uneducated illiterate illegal immigrant costing us $800K to $1 million per treaspasser, etc., they likely would demand serious policies and actions. They don't want that. They want short term fixes, corporate American wants its next quarter to look good.
Just like Ukraine. They won't tell us there are 1.2 to 1.3 million dead Ukrainians, 200K plus amputees, no hope of winning, etc. They want $$$ and control and MIC games.
And why are we spending $1 Trillion per year on military, 400 - 700 military bases around the world?
Insanity.
sycasey said:tequila4kapp said:Sycasey's post is precisely the kind of common sense approach people from both sides should be able to agree on. We are a nation of immigrants. We should promote legal immigration. We should halt the nonsense we've seen lately from D's and globalist R's of gaming the system to benefit their fat cat donors who want the cheap labor for even higher profits.movielover said:It's a big game. The UniParty and Wall Street want an unlimited supply of cheap labor, and Democrats want to rig elections for decades (including Amnesty).sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
Democrats abandoned the middle class and blue collar Americans for POC and unlimited illegal immigration, rigged voter roles, elections, etc.
We allow over one million legal residents entry per year, plus various visas, H1B visas, student viseas, etc.
The UniParty and MSM also lie about the true illegal immigrant count which is easily somewhere between 35 and 50 million. (Ivy League academic research estimate + Autopen importing 10-21 million more.)
If you tell Americans we have, say, 45 million illegal immigrants, 300,000 missing children, the average uneducated illiterate illegal immigrant costing us $800K to $1 million per treaspasser, etc., they likely would demand serious policies and actions. They don't want that. They want short term fixes, corporate American wants its next quarter to look good.
Just like Ukraine. They won't tell us there are 1.2 to 1.3 million dead Ukrainians, 200K plus amputees, no hope of winning, etc. They want $$$ and control and MIC games.
And why are we spending $1 Trillion per year on military, 400 - 700 military bases around the world?
Insanity.
I think if you pressed movielover and bear2034 for their real opinions on this issue, you'll find that they just don't want immigration at all. Especially if the immigrants are not white and not Christian. But maybe they'll surprise me with an actual coherent argument to the contrary one of these days.
dajo9 said:sycasey said:tequila4kapp said:Sycasey's post is precisely the kind of common sense approach people from both sides should be able to agree on. We are a nation of immigrants. We should promote legal immigration. We should halt the nonsense we've seen lately from D's and globalist R's of gaming the system to benefit their fat cat donors who want the cheap labor for even higher profits.movielover said:It's a big game. The UniParty and Wall Street want an unlimited supply of cheap labor, and Democrats want to rig elections for decades (including Amnesty).sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
Democrats abandoned the middle class and blue collar Americans for POC and unlimited illegal immigration, rigged voter roles, elections, etc.
We allow over one million legal residents entry per year, plus various visas, H1B visas, student viseas, etc.
The UniParty and MSM also lie about the true illegal immigrant count which is easily somewhere between 35 and 50 million. (Ivy League academic research estimate + Autopen importing 10-21 million more.)
If you tell Americans we have, say, 45 million illegal immigrants, 300,000 missing children, the average uneducated illiterate illegal immigrant costing us $800K to $1 million per treaspasser, etc., they likely would demand serious policies and actions. They don't want that. They want short term fixes, corporate American wants its next quarter to look good.
Just like Ukraine. They won't tell us there are 1.2 to 1.3 million dead Ukrainians, 200K plus amputees, no hope of winning, etc. They want $$$ and control and MIC games.
And why are we spending $1 Trillion per year on military, 400 - 700 military bases around the world?
Insanity.
I think if you pressed movielover and bear2034 for their real opinions on this issue, you'll find that they just don't want immigration at all. Especially if the immigrants are not white and not Christian. But maybe they'll surprise me with an actual coherent argument to the contrary one of these days.
Yes, most magats just want a white, Christian patriarchy. That's old news. But what's interesting is 45% of non-Black poc allied with them in the 2024 election.
Good luck to them.
It's not out of the question that one group of Trump voters (the hardcore MAGAs) could have a particular white/Christian agenda and another group (working-class Latinos, for example) could have different reasons for voting for him.oski003 said:dajo9 said:sycasey said:tequila4kapp said:Sycasey's post is precisely the kind of common sense approach people from both sides should be able to agree on. We are a nation of immigrants. We should promote legal immigration. We should halt the nonsense we've seen lately from D's and globalist R's of gaming the system to benefit their fat cat donors who want the cheap labor for even higher profits.movielover said:It's a big game. The UniParty and Wall Street want an unlimited supply of cheap labor, and Democrats want to rig elections for decades (including Amnesty).sycasey said:
I think it should be much easier for law-abiding and productive immigrants to gain citizenship than it currently is. If we can do that, I am fine with prosecuting and tossing out the rest.
Democrats abandoned the middle class and blue collar Americans for POC and unlimited illegal immigration, rigged voter roles, elections, etc.
We allow over one million legal residents entry per year, plus various visas, H1B visas, student viseas, etc.
The UniParty and MSM also lie about the true illegal immigrant count which is easily somewhere between 35 and 50 million. (Ivy League academic research estimate + Autopen importing 10-21 million more.)
If you tell Americans we have, say, 45 million illegal immigrants, 300,000 missing children, the average uneducated illiterate illegal immigrant costing us $800K to $1 million per treaspasser, etc., they likely would demand serious policies and actions. They don't want that. They want short term fixes, corporate American wants its next quarter to look good.
Just like Ukraine. They won't tell us there are 1.2 to 1.3 million dead Ukrainians, 200K plus amputees, no hope of winning, etc. They want $$$ and control and MIC games.
And why are we spending $1 Trillion per year on military, 400 - 700 military bases around the world?
Insanity.
I think if you pressed movielover and bear2034 for their real opinions on this issue, you'll find that they just don't want immigration at all. Especially if the immigrants are not white and not Christian. But maybe they'll surprise me with an actual coherent argument to the contrary one of these days.
Yes, most magats just want a white, Christian patriarchy. That's old news. But what's interesting is 45% of non-Black poc allied with them in the 2024 election.
Good luck to them.
You think most people who support Trump's anti-illegal immigration policies just want a white, Christian patriarchy. You think that is old news. But what's interesting is 45% of non-Black poc allied with them in the 2024 election.
LOL
TDS afflicted losers will always be losers
VOTE REPUBLICAN
Go Bears Forever
Paris burns again tonight as migrants run riot.
— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) May 31, 2025
Could've been worse.
1,200 of them missed the riot as they rocked up on small boats from France to England today.
pic.twitter.com/50fUhD4Qo1
So you're saying Paris St. Germain fans over celebrating one of the the biggest wins in their history are migrants?movielover said:Paris burns again tonight as migrants run riot.
— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) May 31, 2025
Could've been worse.
1,200 of them missed the riot as they rocked up on small boats from France to England today.
pic.twitter.com/50fUhD4Qo1
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
So you're saying Paris St. Germain fans over celebrating one of the the biggest wins in their history are migrants?
Are the American victory celebrations that turned destructive done by migrants too?
