Illegal Immigration

256,173 Views | 2661 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by sycasey
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:




Assuming the headline isn't misleading, I am glad government employees are being cut. Forcing someone to wait 35 years for green card processing is outrageous.

I don't follow how would cutting more government employees help this process go faster?

What's actually outrageous is arresting and jailing people who are seemingly trying to do it the "right way."

You're running up against the MAGA fevered dream of fixing everything by destroying it all. There is no plan beyond that. To hell with the consequences.


He is also running up against my skepticism and sarcasm when presented only one side of the story.

So I'm guessing your point is that it's the old woman's fault for not getting citizenship before now?

It would just be nice to get a balanced story on this.

Sure. I just fail to see how a balanced story would justify taking a woman who has no criminal history and is clearly trying to become a legal resident, whisking her away, and placing her in some far-off detention center. How is that a good immigration process?


She likely has a criminal history, but it may just be for immigration violations.

Let's lay down a marker here that when I say "criminal" in this context it means "besides illegal immigration."


Being in the country without authorization is a civil offense and not a criminal offense. But she had a green card so they are just guessing at justifications at this point. They don't care.

This statement is only partially true, and that is if she entered the country at a designated specific port of entry. If she entered at a point not so designated, and stayed in the country without authorization, that would be a felony.

Whether or not crossing the border and remaining here is a felony depends also on whether the person had been in the country previously. If she had previously been deported, and then tried to or did enter the country again, she could be charged with a felony.

If she entered at an official port of entry, and provided false information to the Border Patrol, or did not undergo an inspection, and then remained in the country, those also would be charged as felonies.

If she engaged in a fraudulent marriage to gain entry, she could be charged with a felony.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

But hey, if clamping down on crime is what you want, I suggest we go after the ones who attack law enforcement like "la maggie" here...

"she (and others in her group) had been driving erratically around the ICE vehicles, boxing them in, coming inches from them and behaving in a highly threatening fashion even running red lights and driving the wrong way on one way streets to do so before they, wait for it, rammed the ICE vehicle with multiple vehicles of their own. (report on this)
"la maggie," as she is known, was also armed with a 9mm handgun.
this was not "ICE shooting down some nice lady in cold blood." she quite literally and unequivocally violently attacked them."

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/the-horns-of-the-ice-dilemma

Oh, and on this . . . might be that the original claims from DHS are false. Let's see what comes out in evidence.


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.