Trump is running for president again

186,736 Views | 2558 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by sycasey
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bernie vs Trump?

NO CONTEST




It's shocking you even posed the question.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He knows I'm no Bernie fan.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump's courtroom and campaign calendar collision is here


https://www.axios.com/2024/01/07/trump-2024-election-courtroom-calendar

If the dirty blighter's heart explodes over this it will be like throwing sh@it into a fan.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Bernie vs Trump?

NO CONTEST

Exactly, that's why the DNC had to step in.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When you get clowned by like the 4th or 5th Baldwin, it's not a good day.

concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Trump's courtroom and campaign calendar collision is here


https://www.axios.com/2024/01/07/trump-2024-election-courtroom-calendar

If the dirty blighter's heart explodes over this it will be like throwing sh@it into a fan.




Just look at the next 10 days alone:

Jan. 9: Trump is expected to be in Washington, D.C. for arguments over his claim of presidential immunity in his federal 2020 election interference case.
Jan. 10: Trump is expected to sit for a Fox News town hall on Jan. 10 in Des Moines, Iowa, counterprogramming a CNN debate in the same city between Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley.
Jan. 11: Trump is planning to be in New York for the start of closing arguments in the civil fraud trial over his family business practices.
Jan. 15: The Iowa caucuses take place.
Jan. 16: Another trial to determine damages in writer E. Jean Carroll's defamation case against Trump is slated to begin.


Jan 10 Counterprogramming - he's just bending the RNC over like a cheap hooker. How do they accept that??

What a joke!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JFK had a Dr. Feelgood to get him through the night, I don't know this as a fact, but many people have been saying that tRump has a Dr. Feelgood.

* Max Jacobson - Wikipedia


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Jacobson
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?


I love a doctor who is fat, because it really shows his personal commitment to health.

I also love a doctor who looks like a druggie hippie.

That is, I mean, I love this doctor for Donald Trump, because it means he's probably the best man to kill him off of natural causes!
Lets Go Brandon
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess everyone will stop supporting Trump now because there is an unproven allegation that he did the sorts of things at Epstein's mansion that Trump generally bragged about doing his whole life. In fairness, there is no reason to believe that Ivanka was a victim, despite him often talking about her sexually.

Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

I guess everyone will stop supporting Trump now because there is an unproven allegation that he did the sorts of things at Epstein's mansion that Trump generally bragged about doing his whole life. In fairness, there is no reason to believe that Ivanka was a victim, despite him often talking about her sexually.


I suspect this won't change any of the MAGAs minds. Probably not even if the accusations were from Steven Ransome instead of Sarah Ransome and included making snuff films.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:





The response by tRump's American Democracy hating base: "Good. We hope they were all under 15. Now we really own the libs."

The Evangelical response: "He once was lost but now he's found."
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


A quote from one witness doesn't mean the other witness wasn't correct. Maybe Ms. Menninger wasn't Trump's type, though she was alive and underage, I'll grant you that.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Unit2Sucks said:





The response by tRump's American Democracy hating base: "Good. We hope they were all under 15. Now we really own the libs."
The Evangelical response: "He once was lost but now he's found."
No, we know what will happen. The maroons will claim that only unproven claims made against former Democratic presidents count, and that we shouldn't vote for Joe Biden because Bill Clinton.

They will completely ignore the fact that Trump, who spoke fondly publicly of Epstein, including specifically referencing his pedophilia, has damaging claims against him.

And they will completely ignore that Biden had no connection to Epstein whatsoever and will be the one presidential candidate in 2024 who can make that claim.

If the MAGAts had half a brain, they would run as far away from Epstein but instead they will just cherry-pick and pretend it has something to do with Biden when Trump is the one with the real problem (in addition to all the other dirtbags involved, none of whom (not named Trump) are running for President.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Donald "Purple Nurple" tRump

Donald Trump's alleged 'sexual proclivities' graphically detailed in new Epstein documents | The Independent


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-documents-b2475210.htm
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?




* There is no legal precedent regarding the criminal prosecution of sitting or former presidents.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Donald "Purple Nurple" tRump

Donald Trump's alleged 'sexual proclivities' graphically detailed in new Epstein documents | The Independent


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-documents-b2475210.htm


Well that link was pulled down quickly.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-documents-b2475210.html
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-documents-b2475210.html


Thank you.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Democrats gonna Democrat.
Lets Go Brandon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-documents-b2475210.html
Quote:

In a New Yorker article released in 2019, Ms Ransome said that "she had invented the tapes to draw attention to Epstein's behavior, and to make him believe that she had 'evidence that would come out if he harmed me'".

She did not appear to address the validity of other claims from the emails in her comment to the outlet.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm aware she retracted. Some gal retracted on Dershowitz' exploits on the Lolita Express too. It's called being addicted to breathing.

If someone retracted regarding Bill Clinton's exploits what would that mean to you? Hillbillies like Elvis and Bill are weird mother f'ers. I'd think Bill was still good for it.

*BTW, witnesses that retract are put on the witness stand all the time and impeached with prior inconsistent statements. It happens with regularity in domestic abuse cases because the wife/girlfriend doesn't want another beating…..but convictions occur anyway because the prior statement was inherently more believable. It is basically a "were you lying then or are you lying now?" situation.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They'll believe any old lie about Seth Rich but a retraction for Trump and his gang of goons is gold for them. That's how fascism works. Logic and truth has nothing to do with it.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't know if this is true or not but lololol. I guess it's as true as anything Trump ever claims.

Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This article seems a little far-fetched ("How death threats get Republicans to fall in line behind Trump"), but it's hard to fully discount. Judge Engoron received a bomb threat today and Jack Smith was swatted on Christmas day. MAGA nation is deplorable and takes Trumps violent calls to action literally.

Quote:

"Now," Inglis says, "members of Congress face that [level of hostility] routinely."

In 2016, the Capitol Police recorded fewer than 900 threats against members of Congress. In 2017, that figure more than quadrupled, per data provided by the Capitol Police.

The numbers continued to increase in every year of the Trump presidency, peaking at 9,700 in 2021. In 2022, the first full year of Biden's term, the numbers went down to a still-high 7,500.
...
"It's not even accurate to say [threatening election workers] was rare prior to 2020. It was so rare as to be virtually nonexistent," David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research, told me in 2021. "This is beyond anything that we've ever seen."
...
Former Rep. Peter Meijer (R-MI) recalls one of his House colleagues privately condemning Trump's claims of election fraud, but voting to overturn the election results on the evening of January 6 just hours after the assault.

"My colleague feared for family members, and the danger the vote would put them in," Meijer wrote in a Detroit News op-ed. This fear wasn't idle: After voting to impeach Trump, Meijer himself faced so many threats that felt the need to purchase body armor.

And reporters confirmed these accounts.

"I know for a fact several members *want* to impeach but fear casting that vote could get them or their families murdered," journalist Tim Alberta tweeted before the House impeachment vote.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's dumb and then there is this.

The judge is the person who is deciding Trump's financial (penalty phase) fate.
The judge explicitly gave Trump a set of criteria to agree to by a deadline in order for him to give his own closing argument.
The judge explicitly said Trump could not give closing argument unless he agreed to the terms - which were entirely reasonable, btw - by the deadline.
Trump did not agree to the terms.
Trump apparently gave a closing argument today.

You just don't disrespect a court and intentionally antagonize a judge. Especially when that is the person deciding how much money you will be paying.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"You just don't disrespect a court and intentionally antagonize a judge."


If tRump wasn't 5'7 357 lbs, he could have jumped over the judge's bench and assaulted him.

*I think that judge gave The Leaper 18 months for a baseball bat assault….he will face separate criminal charges for assaulting the judge.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm 2016 Trump claimed that Ted Cruz won the Iowa caucus by cheating, just like he did when he lost the Emmy lol. He's a loser who will never accept the results of an election unless he wins.

Since he is a born loser, he's already got his loser enablers seeding the right wing misinformation sphere with idiotic conspiracies in case he loses in Iowa again.

This is how dumb they are:

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump's allies: MAGA pastors echo stolen election, demonize Democrats


https://www.axios.com/2024/01/12/how-maga-pastors-boost-trump-campaign-2024

"They also include MAGA pastors who, in speeches and podcasts, offer an apocalyptic view of U.S. politics casting Democrats as demonic, promoting Christian nationalism and touting Trump as chosen by God to save Christianity."



*I know some of the flock. Don't think for a minute that if they had the chance they wouldn't force you to follow their beliefs.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"You just don't disrespect a court and intentionally antagonize a judge."


If tRump wasn't 5'7 357 lbs, he could have jumped over the judge's bench and assaulted him.

*I think that judge gave The Leaper 18 months for a baseball bat assault….he will face separate criminal charges for assaulting the judge.

I see what you did there!
Keep it up and he will disappear, wouldn't that be FANTASTIC!!!!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

There's dumb and then there is this.

The judge is the person who is deciding Trump's financial (penalty phase) fate.
The judge explicitly gave Trump a set of criteria to agree to by a deadline in order for him to give his own closing argument.
The judge explicitly said Trump could not give closing argument unless he agreed to the terms - which were entirely reasonable, btw - by the deadline.
Trump did not agree to the terms.
Trump apparently gave a closing argument today.

You just don't disrespect a court and intentionally antagonize a judge. Especially when that is the person deciding how much money you will be paying.


Of course, I'm hoping Engoran goes for the max!!!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

Don't know if this is true or not but lololol. I guess it's as true as anything Trump ever claims.




Would it be incorrect to translate this as:
Trump paid for sex with one girl but humped 10 of them, against Epstein's explicit instructions to not spoil his latest crop of inductees, and then tried to extort Epstein if he didn't give Trump a cut of the action.

Unfortunately for Trump, Epstein was able to successfully ward him off by revealing a hidden camera of trump smacking girls around, forcing them to pee on him (golden shower).
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Certainly more plausible than a lot of other stuff I see on this board
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.