Not taking it "seriously" enough is what helped get us to this point in the first place.
First, what kind of sick ******* would "take joy" with a pandemic that is wreaking havoc with the world, and might actually kill his friends and relatives? Please check your vocabulary and don't project your sociopathy here, Yogi.Professor David Romer said:
I find it deeply amusing that a global warming "non-alarmist" takes so much joy in being a pandemic alarmist.
snort! <-- word made famous on earliest growls bbs, by the one the only Blueblood #respectProfessor David Romer said:
I find it deeply amusing that a global warming "non-alarmist" takes so much joy in being a pandemic alarmist.
Quote:
keeping your kids out of school, which are going to close down later this month anyway.
Unit2Sucks said:
How long before there is a flood of countries who stop all international flights to and from the US? Given that the WHO has noted our inaction and it appears we are resisting any efforts to spread CV, I can't imagine other countries will want to risk their public health on baseless claims by Trump that there is nothing to worry about.Quote:
keeping your kids out of school, which are going to close down later this month anyway.
Cal88 - I'm not convinced that keeping kids out of school will help things (particularly elementary school age kids). They don't seem to be getting sick or at a high risk of transmission but having them at home is super disruptive and will cause more widespread economic distress. These efforts all will have regressive impacts on our country and will spike unemployment/economic distress.
Unit2.....There are all stages of school, but I think for all to keep your kids out now is best. The young are least susceptible to the bad and worst stages of the viral disease but they can walk/run around with the virus within and acting as a transmitter as transmission can go on before symptoms. I think you have been near enough schools to know they are cesspools of transmission by touch, cough, etc.Unit2Sucks said:
How long before there is a flood of countries who stop all international flights to and from the US? Given that the WHO has noted our inaction and it appears we are resisting any efforts to spread CV, I can't imagine other countries will want to risk their public health on baseless claims by Trump that there is nothing to worry about.
Quote:
keeping your kids out of school, which are going to close down later this month anyway.
Cal88 - I'm not convinced that keeping kids out of school will help things (particularly elementary school age kids). They don't seem to be getting sick or at a high risk of transmission but having them at home is super disruptive and will cause more widespread economic distress. These efforts all will have regressive impacts on our country and will spike unemployment/economic distress.
This panic makes Trump being elected almost seem smart by comparison. The idea that you would shut down an entire economy for a virus that is mostly only lethal to people who are already have a compromised health care situation is literally the dumbest thing ever.Unit2Sucks said:
I hear you guys but if we shut down elementary schools we are looking at accelerating the massive economic shock. Unless we can get the high school kids to babysit the elementary school kids until the summer starts. Juggling summer camps is already a mess, but with a virus going around I have no idea what to do with my 2 young kids.
I am fortunate in that I have a school-age nanny whose could probably flex to work more for us if our kids' schools shut down, but for many parents it will be impossible to find affordable help and they will end up with one unemployed spouse. Add that to the number of restaurant and other workers about to become unemployed as a result of social distancing and the cost to our economy from failing to get ahead of this problem when it was small just a few weeks ago will be staggering.
And sadly, because it's probably already too late, we are still going to have 9 figures of infected Americans.
Your absence of compassion is duly noted.Professor Irwin Corey said:This panic makes Trump being elected almost seem smart by comparison. The idea that you would shut down an entire economy for a virus that is mostly only lethal to people who are already have a compromised health care situation is literally the dumbest thing ever.Unit2Sucks said:
I hear you guys but if we shut down elementary schools we are looking at accelerating the massive economic shock. Unless we can get the high school kids to babysit the elementary school kids until the summer starts. Juggling summer camps is already a mess, but with a virus going around I have no idea what to do with my 2 young kids.
I am fortunate in that I have a school-age nanny whose could probably flex to work more for us if our kids' schools shut down, but for many parents it will be impossible to find affordable help and they will end up with one unemployed spouse. Add that to the number of restaurant and other workers about to become unemployed as a result of social distancing and the cost to our economy from failing to get ahead of this problem when it was small just a few weeks ago will be staggering.
And sadly, because it's probably already too late, we are still going to have 9 figures of infected Americans.
This nation is truly full of dumb people.
Your lack of reading ability is also noted.Eastern Oregon Bear said:Your absence of compassion is duly noted.Professor Irwin Corey said:This panic makes Trump being elected almost seem smart by comparison. The idea that you would shut down an entire economy for a virus that is mostly only lethal to people who are already have a compromised health care situation is literally the dumbest thing ever.Unit2Sucks said:
I hear you guys but if we shut down elementary schools we are looking at accelerating the massive economic shock. Unless we can get the high school kids to babysit the elementary school kids until the summer starts. Juggling summer camps is already a mess, but with a virus going around I have no idea what to do with my 2 young kids.
I am fortunate in that I have a school-age nanny whose could probably flex to work more for us if our kids' schools shut down, but for many parents it will be impossible to find affordable help and they will end up with one unemployed spouse. Add that to the number of restaurant and other workers about to become unemployed as a result of social distancing and the cost to our economy from failing to get ahead of this problem when it was small just a few weeks ago will be staggering.
And sadly, because it's probably already too late, we are still going to have 9 figures of infected Americans.
This nation is truly full of dumb people.
Professor Irwin Corey said:This panic makes Trump being elected almost seem smart by comparison. The idea that you would shut down an entire economy for a virus that is mostly only lethal to people who are already have a compromised health care situation is literally the dumbest thing ever.Unit2Sucks said:
I hear you guys but if we shut down elementary schools we are looking at accelerating the massive economic shock. Unless we can get the high school kids to babysit the elementary school kids until the summer starts. Juggling summer camps is already a mess, but with a virus going around I have no idea what to do with my 2 young kids.
I am fortunate in that I have a school-age nanny whose could probably flex to work more for us if our kids' schools shut down, but for many parents it will be impossible to find affordable help and they will end up with one unemployed spouse. Add that to the number of restaurant and other workers about to become unemployed as a result of social distancing and the cost to our economy from failing to get ahead of this problem when it was small just a few weeks ago will be staggering.
And sadly, because it's probably already too late, we are still going to have 9 figures of infected Americans.
This nation is truly full of dumb people.
People go out and participate in life when they have a cold. People go out and participate in life when they have the flu. Even if it's just to go to the store and get medicine to treat their affliction and then go home and rest until they're better. And people who have compromised health care situations are just as at risk from the behavior of those folks as they are if people who are infected with the corona virus are out living their lives. But because this virus is new and doesn't have a vaccine yet, people are freaking out about it, buying a bunch of toilet paper when it has nothing to do with keeping themselves safe, and are willing to shut down their entire lives for something that isn't lethal to 99% of the population.Cal88 said:You're a sociopath.Professor Irwin Corey said:This panic makes Trump being elected almost seem smart by comparison. The idea that you would shut down an entire economy for a virus that is mostly only lethal to people who are already have a compromised health care situation is literally the dumbest thing ever.Unit2Sucks said:
I hear you guys but if we shut down elementary schools we are looking at accelerating the massive economic shock. Unless we can get the high school kids to babysit the elementary school kids until the summer starts. Juggling summer camps is already a mess, but with a virus going around I have no idea what to do with my 2 young kids.
I am fortunate in that I have a school-age nanny whose could probably flex to work more for us if our kids' schools shut down, but for many parents it will be impossible to find affordable help and they will end up with one unemployed spouse. Add that to the number of restaurant and other workers about to become unemployed as a result of social distancing and the cost to our economy from failing to get ahead of this problem when it was small just a few weeks ago will be staggering.
And sadly, because it's probably already too late, we are still going to have 9 figures of infected Americans.
This nation is truly full of dumb people.
Quote:
Q: How about proactive school closures, before there are any infections associated with a school? Are they helpful?
A: Proactive school closuresclosing schools before there's a case there have been shown to be one of the most powerful nonpharmaceutical interventions that we can deploy. Proactive school closures work like reactive school closures not just because they get the children, the little vectors, removed from circulation. It's not just about keeping the kids safe. It's keeping the whole community safe. When you close the schools, you reduce the mixing of the adultsparents dropping off at the school, the teachers being present. When you close the schools, you effectively require the parents to stay home.
There was a wonderful paper published that analyzed data regarding the Spanish flu in 1918, examining proactive versus reactive school closures. When did [regional] authorities close the schools relative to when the epidemic was spiking? What they found was that proactive school closing saved substantial numbers of lives. St. Louis closed the schools about a day in advance of the epidemic spiking, for 143 days. Pittsburgh closed 7 days after the peak and only for 53 days. And the death rate for the epidemic in St. Louis was roughly one-third as high as in Pittsburgh. These things work.