Trump is running for president again

186,346 Views | 2558 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by sycasey
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

calpoly said:

concordtom said:

oski003 said:

concordtom said:

oski003 said:

concordtom said:

Comer says Kushner 'crossed the line of ethics' with Saudi deal


House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said Thursday that Jared Kushner, former President Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser while in office, "crossed the line of ethics" by accepting a $2 billion investment from the Saudi government in his private investment firm six months after he left the White House.

In an interview on CNN's "The Lead with Jake Tapper," Comer acknowledged an argument made by 2024 GOP presidential candidate Chris Christie, who noted Kushner's extensive work in the Middle East on behalf of the Trump White House and claimed in an earlier interview "the Trump family has been involved in grifting for quite some time."


"I've been vocal that I think that what Kushner did crossed the line of ethics," Comer said on CNN

Kushner served his father-in-law in an official capacity as a senior adviser while Trump was president. He met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on behalf of the Trump administration and played a key role in defending the Saudi government after the U.S. concluded the crown prince had approved the killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi for criticism of the kingdom.

In 2022, the House Oversight panel, under Democratic leadership, launched a probe into the $2 billion investment Kushner secured from the Saudi Private Investment Fund (PIF), which is controlled by the crown prince.


"Your close relationship with Crown Prince bin Salman, your pro-Saudi positions during the Trump Administration, and PIF's decision to fund the lion's share of your new business venture only six months after the end of your White House tenure create the appearance of a quid pro quo for your foreign policy work during the Trump Administration," former Oversight Chairman Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) wrote in a letter to Kushner at the time.

In the interview Thursday, Comer insisted the ultimate goal is to change the way Washington works so people cannot benefit from the high-powered jobs their family members have.

"We're trying to do that," Comer said when asked about changing the way Washington works. "That's been the goal from day one is to have a legislative fix. A lot of the President's defenders, especially in the media, say that, 'Well, this influence peddling is a cottage industry in Washington.' Well, it needs to change."


Do you actually read what you post? Your argument requires Kushner to embezzle from an investment fund for his clients. Do you have any evidence whatsoever that he is illegally embezzling from this fund?


Of course I read it.
And give me a break! Of course I think Trump would ask/demand that Jared commingle funds! And I don't have any reason to believe that Jared has the ability to say No.

Call the $2B a finders fee or commission. Trump would absolutely think he is entitled to it!

On May 20, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump and Saudi Arabia's Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud signed a series of letters of intent for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to purchase arms from the United States totaling US$110 billion immediately, and $350 billion over 10 years.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_United_States%E2%80%93Saudi_Arabia_arms_deal#:~:text=On%20May%2020%2C%202017%2C%20U.S.,%24350%20billion%20over%2010%20years.

Are you dense to not be aware of this arms deal, dense to not realize the $2B was surely a kick back quid pro quo gift to Ivanka, dense to not think Trump would view it as "his", or dense to think Jared has the ethics and backbone to manage an investment fund properly?

The Saudis are throwing money around at golf tournaments. You think they care about return rates? No. They are playing politics. And they have bought the US military industrial complex.

Don't be a fool, Oski.


If you want to get out of the world of make believe, you can hypothesize that Kushner can use commissions from his investment fund to support Trump. However, stop lying about Kushner just having $2 billion at his disposal to do what the Trumps want with. That is absolutely false. You wouldn't sound so ridiculous if you didn't start so far from the truth. Don't be a lying TDS fool.


Who is going to stop any find transfers?
Please tell me, when Kushner contacts the bank to wire money to a brokerage for purchase for S&P index funds, does anybody stop that?
And when Kushner contacts the bank to wire money to a bank X for ?, does anybody stop that?

Honestly, I think you must be a fool.
"Honestly, I think you must be a fool."

I suggest ignoring 003. He is the village idiot!


He actually IS on ignore.
I cheated and clicked. Breaking my own boundaries. Just like how Trump broke Carroll's. Just like how Kushner will break fiduciary norms. It happens.


You two should continue to ignore facts and opinions you don't like, get a room, and frolick in your emotionally charged ignorance.
Lets Go Brandon 3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Donald Trump - the peace candidate
Unlocked link to NY Times article

Quote:

But as eager as he is to fight with 280 characters on Twitter, Mr. Trump has proved profoundly reluctant to fight with live ammunition on a real battlefield. "For all of those that say, 'Oh, they should do it, it shows weakness,'" he said, "actually, in my opinion, it shows strength."
Fortunately, he takes his cues from the pro-peace voices in the media, like Tucker, rather than those pro-war nuts at MSNBC, the Atlantic, and the New York Times.

Quote:

It also mattered that he had been so critical of past presidents for being too quick to pull the trigger. In the days leading up to this moment, he had talked with Tucker Carlson, the Fox News host, who reminded him that he had come to office to get out of endless wars, not start a new one.

If he allowed himself to be pulled into a new conflict by the same people who got the United States into Iraq, then Mr. Trump could forget about his chances for re-election, Mr. Carlson told him.


https://media.tenor.com/uARaKFpSkaMAAAAC/anger-management-jack-nicholson.gif

Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump is so delusional he still thinks he has a shot in November and is working with his star-studded lineup of world-class attorneys to adjust the Nixon-era OLC memo to ensure that former POTUS's can't be prosecuted for their crimes.

Maybe Joe Biden should interfere with the DOJ now and force them to issue the memo that Trump wants for protection. That would make their heads explode.





Or maybe Trump's brain worms will take care of things.


bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

bear2034 said:

Since Alec Baldwin is going to prison, SNL will be using Trump to play Trump as well as Baldwin.

Like tRump*, you cavalierly talk about your enemies going to prison. The small step you and he overlook is the jury system and that it takes a unanimous verdict to convict. Bet your pension plan on a hung jury or acquittal for Baldwin.

*Which is why tRump has to impose an authoritarian form of government so he can eliminate or neuter the judicial system so that he can imprison his enemies and set aside all the civil judgments that are ruining him financially.


…and you thought I was overstating my case when I said tRump needs the criminal and civil justice system gone from top to bottom? How else outlaws gonna outlaw?

Republicans now say it might be okay to ignore the Supreme Court


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/01/29/republicans-now-say-it-might-be-okay-ignore-supreme-court/

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

concordtom said:

oski003 said:

concordtom said:

oski003 said:

concordtom said:

Comer says Kushner 'crossed the line of ethics' with Saudi deal


House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said Thursday that Jared Kushner, former President Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser while in office, "crossed the line of ethics" by accepting a $2 billion investment from the Saudi government in his private investment firm six months after he left the White House.

In an interview on CNN's "The Lead with Jake Tapper," Comer acknowledged an argument made by 2024 GOP presidential candidate Chris Christie, who noted Kushner's extensive work in the Middle East on behalf of the Trump White House and claimed in an earlier interview "the Trump family has been involved in grifting for quite some time."


"I've been vocal that I think that what Kushner did crossed the line of ethics," Comer said on CNN

Kushner served his father-in-law in an official capacity as a senior adviser while Trump was president. He met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on behalf of the Trump administration and played a key role in defending the Saudi government after the U.S. concluded the crown prince had approved the killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi for criticism of the kingdom.

In 2022, the House Oversight panel, under Democratic leadership, launched a probe into the $2 billion investment Kushner secured from the Saudi Private Investment Fund (PIF), which is controlled by the crown prince.


"Your close relationship with Crown Prince bin Salman, your pro-Saudi positions during the Trump Administration, and PIF's decision to fund the lion's share of your new business venture only six months after the end of your White House tenure create the appearance of a quid pro quo for your foreign policy work during the Trump Administration," former Oversight Chairman Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) wrote in a letter to Kushner at the time.

In the interview Thursday, Comer insisted the ultimate goal is to change the way Washington works so people cannot benefit from the high-powered jobs their family members have.

"We're trying to do that," Comer said when asked about changing the way Washington works. "That's been the goal from day one is to have a legislative fix. A lot of the President's defenders, especially in the media, say that, 'Well, this influence peddling is a cottage industry in Washington.' Well, it needs to change."


Do you actually read what you post? Your argument requires Kushner to embezzle from an investment fund for his clients. Do you have any evidence whatsoever that he is illegally embezzling from this fund?


Of course I read it.
And give me a break! Of course I think Trump would ask/demand that Jared commingle funds! And I don't have any reason to believe that Jared has the ability to say No.

Call the $2B a finders fee or commission. Trump would absolutely think he is entitled to it!

On May 20, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump and Saudi Arabia's Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud signed a series of letters of intent for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to purchase arms from the United States totaling US$110 billion immediately, and $350 billion over 10 years.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_United_States%E2%80%93Saudi_Arabia_arms_deal#:~:text=On%20May%2020%2C%202017%2C%20U.S.,%24350%20billion%20over%2010%20years.

Are you dense to not be aware of this arms deal, dense to not realize the $2B was surely a kick back quid pro quo gift to Ivanka, dense to not think Trump would view it as "his", or dense to think Jared has the ethics and backbone to manage an investment fund properly?

The Saudis are throwing money around at golf tournaments. You think they care about return rates? No. They are playing politics. And they have bought the US military industrial complex.

Don't be a fool, Oski.


If you want to get out of the world of make believe, you can hypothesize that Kushner can use commissions from his investment fund to support Trump. However, stop lying about Kushner just having $2 billion at his disposal to do what the Trumps want with. That is absolutely false. You wouldn't sound so ridiculous if you didn't start so far from the truth. Don't be a lying TDS fool.


Who is going to stop any find transfers?
Please tell me, when Kushner contacts the bank to wire money to a brokerage for purchase for S&P index funds, does anybody stop that?
And when Kushner contacts the bank to wire money to a bank X for ?, does anybody stop that?

Honestly, I think you must be a fool.


They drafted and passed a law just so they could bypass the state of limitations and Trump could be sued for an unreported rape with no witnesses or physical evidence that allegedly occurred 30 years ago. If Kushner embezzled this widely known $2b dollars, he'd certainly be caught.

Honestly, I think you must be a fool.


I concede that Kushner doesn't need to pay for Trump's penalties, because his MAGA donations will be used.

Campaign finance guidelines be damned.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-doesn-t-answer-asked-171850059.html
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:




I concede that Kushner doesn't need to pay for Trump's penalties, because his MAGA donations will be used.

Campaign finance guidelines be damned.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-doesn-t-answer-asked-171850059.html
It's just another way Trump will cheat on his taxes. Also, more evidence that he's such a narcissist he is forced to pretend losing is winning when he does it.


Quote:

"I didn't do anything wrong. I mean, that's been proven, as far as I'm concerned. And actually, we won in the Court of Appeals. You probably saw that. That case has been largely won in the Court of Appeals," Trump said, referring to the civil fraud trial, which he has not won in the New York Court of Appeals. "That was a political case, coordinated with the White House by the attorney general, I assume is what you're talking about. And we won that case largely in the Court of Appeals."

On the E. Jean Carroll defamation case, Trump said, "That's a ridiculous case. That case is a ridiculous case. We're appealing it. She didn't know anything about me. She didn't know when it happened. There was nothing. People are looking at that case. It's a disgrace. We're appealing that case. We had a very hostile judge. We're appealing that case. It's a ridiculous case."
Deep down in the pit of whatever functions as his equivalent of a soul, he knows he's losing everything and it's eating away at what little is left of his sanity.



Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOLOL, this maroon thinks Alina Habba is another deep state plant sent to wreck Trump. Remember that Trump is supposed to be saving us from the deep state but over and over and over again he's apparently fallen victim to it.

You may as well hire Hunter Biden to teach you computer security or Don Jr to help you quit cocaine. And yet the people most likely to make ridiculous excuses for Trump being a fool are the ones who believe everything he says.


concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's "rich".
I'll stick with the speculative "Trump used Habba for sex and Habba used Trump for lawyer fees and name recognition opportunity" theory.

I bet he banged her 10 times after 3 viagras, then dropped her like Andrew Dice Clay after ringing his bell: "Uuuuh! Get out!"

For Trump, it was never about winning in court. It was about bagging Alina.
For Habba, she'll soon be the next Highest Paid "Only Fans" product.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1/31/24 - 2024 Matchups: Biden Opens Up Lead Over Trump In Head-To-Head, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Haley Leads Biden 1 On 1, But Trails When Third Party Candidates Are Added | Quinnipiac University Poll


https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3889

Biden holds six-point national lead over Trump, fueled by women: poll*


https://nypost.com/2024/01/31/news/biden-holds-six-point-national-lead-over-trump-fueled-by-women-poll/

*If this keeps up, tRump will have to change his stance and go Pro Choice (you know, like when he made the choice for his dates). Evangelical response:? "God evolved."

* in other news:

10 States With the Highest STD Rates | Healthiest Communities Health News | U.S. News


https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/slideshows/10-states-with-the-highest-std-rates

Didn't anyone tell The Deplorables to keep the naughty bits buttoned/zipped up once in a while?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Roberta is next going to take on misinformation.

HOORAY
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump braces for Jan. 6 conviction before 2024 election, plots courtroom drama


https://www.axios.com/2024/02/02/trump-conviction-trial-jan-6-court
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bolton, the warmongering GOPer who was the longest serving of Trump's 4 national security advisors, says the obvious. Trump of course thinks terrible things about the guy he hired who was a known commodity for decades but as Bolton points out, Trump's narcissism prevents him from understanding the most basic of concepts.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CNN's Kaitlan Collins is a man, prove me wrong.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump's new power moves within GOP ahead of election against Biden


https://www.axios.com/2024/02/07/trump-new-urgency-political-flexing-biden
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

CNN's Kaitlan Collins is a man, prove me wrong.


Prove yourself right. Also , if you're going to respond, make sure to be signed into the correct account. I'm sure it can be tricky to be juggling so many accounts whilst being a total idiot.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thought this was interesting - huge percentage of Americans have no idea that Trump is in legal jeopardy. They don't know he was found liable for sexual assault and defamation of his victim, or about his fraudulent valuation and business records, or charges against him for trying to overturn the election.

In fact - even the most widely known indictment, regarding his theft of government records, is still only known by 59% of Americans and 45% of Republicans.

There is no way this stuff doesn't become more prominent as the election season heats up. Right now most people aren't paying any attention to politics or Trump.

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

Thought this was interesting - huge percentage of Americans have no idea that Trump is in legal jeopardy. They don't know he was found liable for sexual assault and defamation of his victim, or about his fraudulent valuation and business records, or charges against him for trying to overturn the election.

In fact - even the most widely known indictment, regarding his theft of government records, is still only known by 59% of Americans and 45% of Republicans.

There is no way this stuff doesn't become more prominent as the election season heats up. Right now most people aren't paying any attention to politics or Trump.




What are the details of him allegedly facilitating drug trafficking operations? I missed that one.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Thought this was interesting - huge percentage of Americans have no idea that Trump is in legal jeopardy. They don't know he was found liable for sexual assault and defamation of his victim, or about his fraudulent valuation and business records, or charges against him for trying to overturn the election.

In fact - even the most widely known indictment, regarding his theft of government records, is still only known by 59% of Americans and 45% of Republicans.

There is no way this stuff doesn't become more prominent as the election season heats up. Right now most people aren't paying any attention to politics or Trump.




What are the details of him allegedly facilitating drug trafficking operations? I missed that one.
You also missed the False: in front of the question. They threw a couple of false accusations in there to see what response it would get.

Did you think Trump had been charged with violating the emoluments clause?
Lets Go Brandon 3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Comer says Kushner 'crossed the line of ethics' with Saudi deal


House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said Thursday that Jared Kushner, former President Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser while in office, "crossed the line of ethics" by accepting a $2 billion investment from the Saudi government in his private investment firm six months after he left the White House.

In an interview on CNN's "The Lead with Jake Tapper," Comer acknowledged an argument made by 2024 GOP presidential candidate Chris Christie, who noted Kushner's extensive work in the Middle East on behalf of the Trump White House and claimed in an earlier interview "the Trump family has been involved in grifting for quite some time."


"I've been vocal that I think that what Kushner did crossed the line of ethics," Comer said on CNN

Kushner served his father-in-law in an official capacity as a senior adviser while Trump was president. He met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on behalf of the Trump administration and played a key role in defending the Saudi government after the U.S. concluded the crown prince had approved the killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi for criticism of the kingdom.

In 2022, the House Oversight panel, under Democratic leadership, launched a probe into the $2 billion investment Kushner secured from the Saudi Private Investment Fund (PIF), which is controlled by the crown prince.


"Your close relationship with Crown Prince bin Salman, your pro-Saudi positions during the Trump Administration, and PIF's decision to fund the lion's share of your new business venture only six months after the end of your White House tenure create the appearance of a quid pro quo for your foreign policy work during the Trump Administration," former Oversight Chairman Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) wrote in a letter to Kushner at the time.

In the interview Thursday, Comer insisted the ultimate goal is to change the way Washington works so people cannot benefit from the high-powered jobs their family members have.

"We're trying to do that," Comer said when asked about changing the way Washington works. "That's been the goal from day one is to have a legislative fix. A lot of the President's defenders, especially in the media, say that, 'Well, this influence peddling is a cottage industry in Washington.' Well, it needs to change."

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's now been arrested 4 times and charged with a total of 91 felony counts.

Sadly, I suspect that the average American is also unaware of what Section 3 of what the 14th Amendment says either.

Donald Trump case tracker: where does each investigation stand? | Donald Trump | The Guardian

"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I confess, it's hard to keep up with this scotus hearing!

Maybe better to just chop his head off.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First, the trump lawyer was getting pummeled and I felt good.
Now the Colorado guy is getting pummeled. He seems pretty young!

I would hate to try and go up against nine pros like this.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

First, the trump lawyer was getting pummeled and I felt good.
Now the Colorado guy is getting pummeled. He seems pretty young!

I would hate to try and go up against nine pros like this.


I'm listening as well.
It's a very tough 'crowd" for sure!

Seems like a fairly bi-partisan effort from the SCOTUS bench.
Even Justice Jackson provided a Pro-Trump "offramp" for their upcoming decision, which I think (clearly) favors one that allows Trump to be on the ballot.


"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I propose confusing butterfly ballots as part of the 2024 solution, just as for Bush in 2000.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gavin knew keeping tRump off ballot was a loser so he punted. SCOTUS will clearly dump that lower court decision…..but bet your 401(k) that SCOTUS, with the exception of Thomas and Alito, will F tRump on Presidential Immunity if they accept review.

Jason Murray, 38, hired by Colorado to handle the argument, is a double Harvard guy and clerked for a couple of the Justices. Braniac with a losing case.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/07/lawyers-supreme-court-trump-ballot-case/
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brain worms strike again. He sounds older than Abe Simpson.

82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

Brain worms strike again. He sounds older than Abe Simpson.





But, but, but, Biden.
But, but, but Trump.

So proud of our country.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Brain worms strike again. He sounds older than Abe Simpson.





But, but, but, Biden.
But, but, but Trump.

So proud of our country.


Whataboutism2sucks.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Brain worms strike again. He sounds older than Abe Simpson.





But, but, but, Biden.
But, but, but Trump.

So proud of our country.
It is what it is. Smart people are as unpopular as ever in America. Liz Warren was considered an egghead so people went for Biden because he's folksy. Obviously every candidate has multiple knocks, but the dislike of intelligent people certainly factored in. Ditto for Clinton (although that was more about Boomers hating women).

Obama may be our last smart president.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree, the Hitler comparisons are ludicrous and pure TDS induced paranoia:





* It would take a jury verdict to accomplish pretty much everything on his wish list. I guess he forgot to add "get rid of the judicial system" to his list.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Lets Go Brandon 3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Brain worms strike again. He sounds older than Abe Simpson.


But, but, but, Biden.
But, but, but Trump.

So proud of our country.
It is what it is. Smart people are as unpopular as ever in America. Liz Warren was considered an egghead so people went for Biden because he's folksy. Obviously every candidate has multiple knocks, but the dislike of intelligent people certainly factored in. Ditto for Clinton (although that was more about Boomers hating women).

Obama may be our last smart president.
People who think they're smart, but aren't (like Unit2Sucks who falls for every piece of Democrat, Israel, and war propaganda no matter how lame) worship at the altar of "smart." But being smart doesn't mean you're not a grifter (see the Clintons). People don't want smart politicians that grift any more than they want demented potatoes that grift. They want principled politicians that will actually do the right thing.

Elizabeth Warren wasn't rejected because she was smart. She was rejected because she showed she was gonna pander to the Clinton arm of the Democrats. Unfortunately, there are still too many potatoes in the Democratic Party who thought Biden was a good idea. Fortunately, many of those people have realized that having a potato for a President was a bad idea, which is why he's the most unpopular President in history.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

I agree, the Hitler comparisons are ludicrous and pure TDS induced paranoia:
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting tactic, quoting a convicted felon and known liar to support a point. This tells me your point is pretty weak if this is the best support you can muster.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.