Official Trump / Vance Administration Thread

131,058 Views | 2703 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by bearister
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

DiabloWags said:

It's funny seeing the MAGAt's support this guy.

The media you consume doesn't report news which should include the good things the Trump admin has been doing for the country. That's why you're constantly dumbfounded

You mean the Wall Street Journal (owned by Rupert Murdoch) who got Chump elected the first time around and has some of the most conservative editorial columnists on the planet isn't fit for consumption?

Thanks again for showing us that you have no idea what you're talking about.

Your preposterous logic never changes.
Back on ignore.


movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

movielover said:


she's in state prison brah. What happens to all you states rights guys? I guess they matter when they matter to you. Ok.


Political prisoner brah. FAFO.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HUMM BABY!!

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We'll see if this sticks.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

cal83dls79 said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

DiabloWags said:


Japanese Americans during World War 2 might beg to differ on this "first" business.


Yes, Democrat FDRs prison camps, Executive Order 906.
so you agree, it's a bad idea.


Japanese-Americans committed no crimes. Illegal immigrant human traffickers - and likely rapists (I'm told it's a job 'perk') - should be expeditiously removed.
Perhaps, but if you're going to imprison them then you still have to prove it in court.

Are you serious?

Maggots have no idea what the 5th Amendment says.

Democrats have lost common sense.

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

DiabloWags said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

cal83dls79 said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

DiabloWags said:


Japanese Americans during World War 2 might beg to differ on this "first" business.


Yes, Democrat FDRs prison camps, Executive Order 906.
so you agree, it's a bad idea.


Japanese-Americans committed no crimes. Illegal immigrant human traffickers - and likely rapists (I'm told it's a job 'perk') - should be expeditiously removed.
Perhaps, but if you're going to imprison them then you still have to prove it in court.

Are you serious?

Maggots have no idea what the 5th Amendment says.

Democrats have lost common sense.


Once again:

Deportation is not the same as imprisonment. The latter is where there has been no due process and where the court says there needs to be.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Once again: Illegal immigration is illegal.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hegseth has been reported to have used Signal on a dozen conversations. Can't this idiot get out of his own way.? When you hire based on how a person looks on TV and absent qualifications, this is what you get. One has to wonder how many foreign countries have already obtained access to his phone given the carelessness that he treats National Security with. IMO he is a Dead Man Walking
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Once again: Illegal immigration is illegal.
And this has been punishable by life imprisonment since when . . . ?
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Once again: Illegal immigration is illegal.
If they had done it the right way the courts would have no choice but to confirm that the deportations were legal, but they did the opposite, they used half-assed pretexts to justify illegal detentions and denial of rights under the Constitution. If we are a law abiding country then you can"t just pick and choose which laws you will ignore. They can't ignore due process and expect that there would be legal repercussions.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The majority opinion in the Supreme Court case, Zadvydas v. Davis holds that aliens, although not citizens are entitled to Due Process of law. In Zadvydas,the Court held potentially permanent detention of an illegal immigrant awaiting deportation unconstitutional, as the illegal immigrant still had liberty rights. The Court held that an immigrant awaiting deportation could not be held for more than ninety days without a hearing providing, "freedom from imprisonment lies at the heart of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause."

However, more importantly, the Supreme Court confirmed that all persons are protected and entitled to due process under the United States Constitution. The Court confirmed, "but once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the Due Process Clause applies to all 'persons' within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence here is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent."

Illegal Immigration and the Right to Due Process Juris Magazine


bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

Hegseth has been reported to have used Signal on a dozen conversations. Can't this idiot get out of his own way.? When you hire based on how a person looks on TV and absent qualifications, this is what you get. One has to wonder how many foreign countries have already obtained access to his phone given the carelessness that he treats National Security with. IMO he is a Dead Man Walking

Were you with HawaiiBear locked in a room playing video games for the last month, too?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

Once again: Illegal immigration is illegal.
And this has been punishable by life imprisonment since when . . . ?
Who's being punished with life imprisonment for the crime of entering the country illegally?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

bear2034 said:

Once again: Illegal immigration is illegal.
If they had done it the right way the courts would have no choice but to confirm that the deportations were legal, but they did the opposite, they used half-assed pretexts to justify illegal detentions and denial of rights under the Constitution. If we are a law abiding country then you can"t just pick and choose which laws you will ignore. They can't ignore due process and expect that there would be legal repercussions.
If they had done it the right way, the Biden administration would not have flown in migrants to the country illegally. But they did and lied to the American people when they said the borders were secure. And in doing so, Biden violated Article II of the U.S. Constitution where it states that the president shall enforce laws related to national security and border protection and Article IV where it states the federal government is obligated to protect states "against Invasion." While this applies to the government broadly, the president, as the chief executive, is responsible for executing this protection, such as deploying military forces or coordinating federal resources.
If we are a law abiding country then you can't just pick and choose which parts of the Constitution you will ignore. Democrats can't ignore the U.S. Constitution and expect that there won't be repercussions.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

Once again: Illegal immigration is illegal.
And this has been punishable by life imprisonment since when . . . ?
Who's being punished with life imprisonment for the crime of entering the country illegally?
The guys we sent to El Salvador. Have they been convicted of anything else?
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

BearNIt said:

bear2034 said:

Once again: Illegal immigration is illegal.
If they had done it the right way the courts would have no choice but to confirm that the deportations were legal, but they did the opposite, they used half-assed pretexts to justify illegal detentions and denial of rights under the Constitution. If we are a law abiding country then you can"t just pick and choose which laws you will ignore. They can't ignore due process and expect that there would be legal repercussions.
If they had done it the right way, the Biden administration would not have flown in migrants to the country illegally. But they did and lied to the American people when they said the borders were secure. And in doing so, Biden violated Article II of the U.S. Constitution where it states that the president shall enforce laws related to national security and border protection and Article IV where it states the federal government is obligated to protect states "against Invasion." While this applies to the government broadly, the president, as the chief executive, is responsible for executing this protection, such as deploying military forces or coordinating federal resources.
If we are a law abiding country then you can't just pick and choose which parts of the Constitution you will ignore. Democrats can't ignore the U.S. Constitution and expect that there won't be repercussions.
And all this time I thought Trump was the "Alpha Male" who took responsibility for his actions regarding deportation. They dug out some law that is supposed to be used during war time ie The Alien & Enemies of 1798. The courts have called shenanigans on its use and has barred the administration from using it. The President just admitted that there is no emergency on the border and that attempts to cross the border are low therefore the use of an emergency declaration is not kosher. He has hamstrung multiple industries that need the labor ie meat processing, farming, cattle farming, and construction to just name a few. This makes things more expensive if we can even get the things that we want. If he ran on reducing cost to families, he is failing spectacularly.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump only hires the best people:

Trump Education Secretary mocked for embarrassing Harvard letter

https://mol.im/a/14685541

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think VallejoWags has a thing for military men in dresses.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

MAGA for MORONS!

Q4: 2.4% GDP

Q1: - 0.3% GDP

Companies were frontrunning the tariffs in Q1 and importing much more than usual. Otherwise, Q1 GDP would have been above 4%. Short term pain but long term gains in the foreseeable future.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

I think VallejoWags has a thing for military men in dresses.
As someone who has strong opinions about everything, he's been very quiet about military men in dresses.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Trump only hires the best people:

Trump Education Secretary mocked for embarrassing Harvard letter

https://mol.im/a/14685541


Linda McMahon's qualifications for the job were green and had lots of zeros.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not using professional editing symbols.^^^ pot / kettle
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Will another unqualified nutjob be added to this administration? Stay tuned to find out!

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump eying Fox News host Jeanine Pirro for top prosecutor in DC

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/trump-eying-fox-news-host-jeanine-pirro-top/story?id=121604820


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
America Ascendant: The Golden Age Nobody Saw Coming

chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We are so cooked.


DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can you imagine how many Trumper's here would lose their shi* if Harris had won and hired 23 people from MSNBC?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kash Patel Has No FBI Budget for Senate Budget Hearing


https://www.mediaite.com/politics/you-have-no-timeline-senator-gobsmacked-by-fbi-director-kash-patel-showing-up-at-budget-hearing-without-a-budget/
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


2034 Pumping!
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Can you imagine how many Trumper's here would lose their shi* if Harris had won and hired 23 people from MSNBC?
Be honest, if Kamala won, you would lose yours.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is what I voted for.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.