Official Trump / Vance Administration Thread

121,868 Views | 2570 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by movielover
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

Once again: if companies continue to lose value they will stop hiring people and start laying them off, and then you will have a real recession. This attitude that the stock market is divorced from "main street" is so silly.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

bear2034 said:


2034 the great retweeter of stuff of BI

Aren't Democrat socialists ecstatic that Trump stuck it to the rich?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

If you're nearing retirement and your 401k consists mainly of managed target funds, a large percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to bonds instead of stocks?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Chuck Schumer sounds a lot like Donald Trump here.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

If you're nearing retirement and your 401k consists mainly of managed target funds, a large percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to bonds instead of stocks?
oh jeez. Not even worth the response. Exactly how old are you?
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

If you're nearing retirement and your 401k consists mainly of managed target funds, a large percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to bonds instead of stocks?


This is correct. I am not sure why the poster above me is mocking conventional wisdom.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

If you're nearing retirement and your 401k consists mainly of managed target funds, a large percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to bonds instead of stocks?


This is correct. I am not sure why the poster above me is mocking conventional wisdom.
When did I say I didn't have a substantial position in bonds? I'd say stick to talking about what you know, but that wouldn't leave much.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

If you're nearing retirement and your 401k consists mainly of managed target funds, a large percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to bonds instead of stocks?
oh jeez. Not even worth the response. Exactly how old are you?
Yeah, that's why I didn't respond to this. He knows nothing about me, my financial situation, etc. He just thinks he's scoring points in some game.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

Once again: if companies continue to lose value they will stop hiring people and start laying them off, and then you will have a real recession. This attitude that the stock market is divorced from "main street" is so silly.

The highly twisted "logic" that the MAGA MORONS promote here wouldn't even cut it with a high school debate team.

Their lack of basic economic concepts is truly remarkable.
And the fact that they can't see that these so-called "reciprocal" tariffs were MADE UP by the White House is equally telling.

And my guess is that they wouldn't be caught dead working in an Apple iPhone manufacturing plant here in the States . . . "screwing in millions of tiny screws into an iPhone" like Trump's Commerce Secretary has suggested.



Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Translations? Translations? We don't need no stinkin' foreign language translations of weather warnings!

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/08/weather/warning-translation-noaa-nws-cuts/index.html
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Translations? Translations? We don't need no stinkin' foreign language translations of weather warnings!

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/08/weather/warning-translation-noaa-nws-cuts/index.html


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

If you're nearing retirement and your 401k consists mainly of managed target funds, a large percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to bonds instead of stocks?


This is correct. I am not sure why the poster above me is mocking conventional wisdom.
because it's not even close to conventional wisdom. Between 03, lover of movies and 2034 please don't offer any portfolio allocation and strategy advice. It's like the Lutnick trio
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

oski003 said:

bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

If you're nearing retirement and your 401k consists mainly of managed target funds, a large percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to bonds instead of stocks?


This is correct. I am not sure why the poster above me is mocking conventional wisdom.
because it's not even close to conventional wisdom. Between 03, lover of movies and 2034 please don't offer any portfolio allocation and strategy advice. It's like the Lutnick trio


What should someone near retirement age do then? Shouldn't they get more conservative in case the market drops?
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

cal83dls79 said:

oski003 said:

bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

If you're nearing retirement and your 401k consists mainly of managed target funds, a large percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to bonds instead of stocks?


This is correct. I am not sure why the poster above me is mocking conventional wisdom.
because it's not even close to conventional wisdom. Between 03, lover of movies and 2034 please don't offer any portfolio allocation and strategy advice. It's like the Lutnick trio


What should someone near retirement age do then? Shouldn't they get more conservative in case the market drops?
of course. There is an array of low risk options. But if you are "nearing" retirement bonds would NOT be my investment of choice when you consider you got 30 more years to go. That's all the advice I'll give. Everyone has their own risk spectrum. Pretty clear how old I am given my BI name. Good luck out there. The market was a complete disaster this last week and self inflicted. For someone newly retired it's not a joke.
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Please note my above correction
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

oski003 said:

cal83dls79 said:

oski003 said:

bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:


I'm not upset about them. I'm upset about the 15% of my retirement fund that's evaporated.

If you're nearing retirement and your 401k consists mainly of managed target funds, a large percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to bonds instead of stocks?


This is correct. I am not sure why the poster above me is mocking conventional wisdom.
because it's not even close to conventional wisdom. Between 03, lover of movies and 2034 please don't offer any portfolio allocation and strategy advice. It's like the Lutnick trio


What should someone near retirement age do then? Shouldn't they get more conservative in case the market drops?
of course. There is an array of low risk options. But if you are "nearing" retirement bonds would NOT be my investment of choice when you consider you got 30 more years to go. That's all the advice I'll give. Everyone has their own risk spectrum. Pretty clear how old I am given my BI name. Good luck out there. The market was a complete disaster this last week and self inflicted. For someone newly retired it's not a joke.


The "100 minus your age" rule suggests subtracting your age from 100 to determine the percentage of your portfolio you should invest in stocks, with the remaining percentage allocated to bonds or other fixed income investments.

Here's a breakdown:

The Rule:
The core concept is to subtract your age from 100 to arrive at the suggested percentage of your portfolio that should be invested in stocks.

Example:
If you are 30 years old, the rule suggests investing 70% (100 - 30) in stocks and 30% in bonds or other fixed income investments.

Rationale:
This rule is based on the idea that younger investors have a longer time horizon and can tolerate more risk, while older investors, closer to retirement, prioritize capital preservation and a more stable income stream.

Limitations:
The rule is a general guideline and may not be suitable for everyone, as individual circumstances and risk tolerance can vary. SmartAsset says that a one-size-fits-all approach can lead to unintended consequences, especially in changing economic environments or under unique personal circumstances.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MAGA MORON PETER NAVARRO

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-08/trump-weighed-even-bigger-tariffs-in-push-by-china-hawk-navarro?sref=B0vfP3lF
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

MAGA MORON PETER NAVARRO

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-08/trump-weighed-even-bigger-tariffs-in-push-by-china-hawk-navarro?sref=B0vfP3lF


Kinda fun listening to Navarro and Ex-President Musk* trading insults in public this week!


* Ex-President Musk probably thanks his lucky stars for William Henry Harrison. Otherwise, he would've had the shortest tenure as President in US history!
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Historic move in the markets.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Reciprocal tariffs of 10% still in effect.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


Historic move in the markets.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The left still can't meme.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

bye bye shorts.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

The left still can't meme.
You do realize that this (partial) rebound only happened because Trump reversed his stated policy, right? Not going through with your own bad idea doesn't mean you're a genius.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

The left still can't meme.
You do realize that this (partial) rebound only happened because Trump reversed his stated policy, right? Not going through with your own bad idea doesn't mean you're a genius.
He's pathetically dumb.

The market rallied because they paused being "liberated".
lol
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


bye bye shorts.
The market cap is still down over 6 trillion under Trump's leadership.

Funny how you were scarce while the bottom was falling out and now a partial recovery has you giddily spiking the football at the 40 yard line as if a victory has been won.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bingo.

That's why I finally put him on IGNORE along with MovieClown, Minot Juco, Oski, Zipper, and Cal88.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

The left still can't meme.
You do realize that this (partial) rebound only happened because Trump reversed his stated policy, right? Not going through with your own bad idea doesn't mean you're a genius.

Suddenly, people don't think Trump will pull something again to rattle the markets!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

The left still can't meme.
You do realize that this (partial) rebound only happened because Trump reversed his stated policy, right? Not going through with your own bad idea doesn't mean you're a genius.
He's pathetically dumb.

The market rallied because they paused being "liberated".
lol


You must be upset that you either converted your equities to cash or that you know your short positions are going to get wrecked. It's never a good idea to try timing the market. You should know this by now.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.