I usually just glance at the Today In Cops thread and very rarely watch the videos or read the stories. I just don't have the time for it. So, I voice few, if any, any opinions there because I don't have a good grasp of the facts. As for Ronny Jackson, I haven't read any news stories about what happened. I just watched the video. I'll admit that my opinion could be changed if I dug deeper into the story and learned more.calbear93 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:When have I ever defended criminals? I've steered clear of those arguments. You're the one who seems agitated and emotional about this. Calling me "so offended" is a rather large overstatement of my feelings in the matter. It seems like a misunderstanding that got out of control because of Jackson's behavior. Not that big a deal.calbear93 said:I am asking you why you justify similar actions by criminals when you are so offended by this. For me, I am offended by both. When have I said what he did is OK? For me, always obey the police officer and trust law and order. Doesn't matter if you are a doctor or a shop lifter/car jacker.Eastern Oregon Bear said:So you think you can justify Ronny Jackson's actions by comparing it to a completely different made up situation?calbear93 said:chazzed said:
(Apologies if this is a booth.)Back the blue
— Pete Strzok (@petestrzok) August 15, 2023
“You are a fucking full-on dick!” Jackson told the trooper…“You better recalculate, motherfucker!”
https://t.co/LwtJ7Qy1Tf
Would you feel more sympathetic if he were car jacking, shop lifting or vandalizing as opposed to providing medical assistance that led to the confrontation? Assume a different race and assume this was in the pursuit of stopping a crime and you may find more sympathy and rationalization.What difference does it make who posted the video if it's an unaltered video? An asshat acting like an asshat is still an asshat.Quote:
If Pete Strzok wants to continue to portray that his role in investigating Trump while he was in the FBI was not political, he should not act like some knee-jerk liberal hack like this.
I suspect Pete Strzok wasn't the only account posting that video.
I did not say the Pete Strzok was the only one posting. But the accusation from the far right was that his political bias as opposed to evidence drove the aggressive investigation of Trump based on discredited source. His decision to post tweets (this isn't the only one) that reveals he is a liberal hack just adds support to the accusations made by the far right. Not helpful. And it was not altered but it was taken out of context. Where is the portion showing what he was doing before being detained? Does he post similar things when there is accusation of police brutality when the detained refuses to obey police order? Seems biased, no? Maybe not to you. Again, you think the right is blinded by tribalism. Yet you don't see it in yourself.
Yes, I'd like to see some video of what happened earlier. It would make what followed clearer to understand. However, since that video doesn't seem to exist, I have to go with what I saw on the video. Jackson acting belligerent and overwrought, resisting the officers and bystanders saying Jackson's help wasn't needed or desired. Certainly, by the time the cops showed up, there were other people that could provide any needed medical assistance. Yet Jackson continued to be angry and act out. It doesn't make him look innocent. It makes me wonder if it's another instance of his being drunk in public.
Fair enough. Just to be clear, if you think Jackson disobeying police in this example is stupid and inexcusable, you also believe the same , similar to Oski003, in those examples posted by G4R in the Today, in cops. Otherwise you are just talking out of both sides of your mouth. I will affirmative claim that in both cases, the detained were being foolish.