The Official Impeach tRump Thread

59,566 Views | 1640 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by bearister
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Agree to disagree. My vantage point says put that effort (lip service) into making sure he doesn't win again.
Seems to me getting all his crimes out in the open in an impeachment proceeding is something that can help with that.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

going4roses said:

Agree to disagree. My vantage point says put that effort (lip service) into making sure he doesn't win again.
Seems to me getting all his crimes out in the open in an impeachment proceeding is something that can help with that.


I don't know we shall see
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Impeachment is forever.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
kelly09
How long do you want to ignore this user?




sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Sperry

Paul Sperry's usual outlets:

WorldNetDaily
Wall Street Journal
Fox News
New York Post

Sounds about right.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kelly09 said:








Lol if Democrats who received money from Hunter have to recuse, what about all of the republicans who ride off Trump's coattails? Hunter giving a few bucks to a senator pales in comparison to Trump holding rallies for senators and tweeting support.

I'm all for conflicted senators recusing, but let's have an objective standard.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

kelly09 said:








Lol if Democrats who received money from Hunter have to recuse, what about all of the republicans who ride off Trump's coattails? Hunter giving a few bucks to a senator pales in comparison to Trump holding rallies for senators and tweeting support.

I'm all for conflicted senators recusing, but let's have an objective standard.

And also, the impeachment has NOTHING TO DO WITH Hunter Biden. He could be guilty as sin and it would still be wrong for Trump to blackmail a foreign government to investigate him for his own political gain.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh look, Lev Parnas has something to share.



CNN
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
...and to think, I was once misinformed enough to believe our nation was being led by a man with the emotional maturity of a 10 year old.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kelly09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Sperry

Paul Sperry's usual outlets:

WorldNetDaily
Wall Street Journal
Fox News
New York Post

Sounds about right.
So what?
Professor Turgeson Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kelly09 said:

sycasey said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Sperry

Paul Sperry's usual outlets:

WorldNetDaily
Wall Street Journal
Fox News
New York Post

Sounds about right.
So what?
Right-wing echo chambers tell their audience what they want to hear, even if there's no factual basis.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kelly09 said:

sycasey said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Sperry

Paul Sperry's usual outlets:

WorldNetDaily
Wall Street Journal
Fox News
New York Post

Sounds about right.
So what?

So if you want to sincerely engage with the rest of us, bring some material from outside the right-wing media bubble.
kelly09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

kelly09 said:

sycasey said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Sperry

Paul Sperry's usual outlets:

WorldNetDaily
Wall Street Journal
Fox News
New York Post

Sounds about right.
So what?

So if you want to sincerely engage with the rest of us, bring some material from outside the right-wing media bubble.
Is there a left wing media bubble?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kelly09 said:

sycasey said:

kelly09 said:

sycasey said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Sperry

Paul Sperry's usual outlets:

WorldNetDaily
Wall Street Journal
Fox News
New York Post

Sounds about right.
So what?

So if you want to sincerely engage with the rest of us, bring some material from outside the right-wing media bubble.
Is there a left wing media bubble?

Presumably yes. But I'm not going to bring a Rachel Maddow piece to a conservative and expect them to buy it without additional corroboration, even if I happen to agree with her.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kelly09 said:

sycasey said:

kelly09 said:

sycasey said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Sperry

Paul Sperry's usual outlets:

WorldNetDaily
Wall Street Journal
Fox News
New York Post

Sounds about right.
So what?

So if you want to sincerely engage with the rest of us, bring some material from outside the right-wing media bubble.
Is there a left wing media bubble?


The GOP and their media allies would like us to think so, but not really. Facts have a liberal bias, so any outlet reporting the facts will appear liberal to RWNJs and their enablers.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:




Seeking a judicial review of congressional subpoenas is NOT blocking testimony, it's following Constitutional separation of powers.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

bearister said:




Seeking a judicial review of congressional subpoenas is NOT blocking testimony, it's following Constitutional separation of powers.

No, it's a stall tactic, obstruction of Congress and ignores the constitutional powers of Congressional oversight and impeachment powers.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL at calling what Trump is doing separation of powers. You need an actual legal argument to make that claim and inventing absolute immunity is not following the constitution.

In fact, I'm surprised that conservatives who claim to honor the text of the constitution haven't come out against executive privilege. It's almost as if they don't really believe in strict construction when it doesn't favor them politically.

What Trump is doing is making it possible for Republicans to put their head in the sand so they can pretend this is all okay because they believe the ends justify the means. Let's stop pretending there is something else going on.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS said:

oski003 said:

bearister said:




Seeking a judicial review of congressional subpoenas is NOT blocking testimony, it's following Constitutional separation of powers.

No, it's a stall tactic, obstruction of Congress and ignores the constitutional powers of Congressional oversight and impeachment powers.


Lol.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/doj-will-fight-impeachment-subpoenas-unless-trump-administration-witnesses-are-allowed-attorneys

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/474710-supreme-court-ruling-pulls-rug-out-from-under-article-of-impeachment%3famp

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/602782/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/476153-alan-dershowitz-joe-biden-is-right-and-so-was-president-trump%3famp
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

LOL at calling what Trump is doing separation of powers. You need an actual legal argument to make that claim and inventing absolute immunity is not following the constitution.

In fact, I'm surprised that conservatives who claim to honor the text of the constitution haven't come out against executive privilege. It's almost as if they don't really believe in strict construction when it doesn't favor them politically.

What Trump is doing is making it possible for Republicans to put their head in the sand so they can pretend this is all okay because they believe the ends justify the means. Let's stop pretending there is something else going on.


Lol.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/doj-will-fight-impeachment-subpoenas-unless-trump-administration-witnesses-are-allowed-attorneys

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/474710-supreme-court-ruling-pulls-rug-out-from-under-article-of-impeachment%3famp

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/602782/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/476153-alan-dershowitz-joe-biden-is-right-and-so-was-president-trump%3famp
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOl at Alan Dershowitz. Please point me to the words in the constitution that justify Trump's legal defenses.

What's sad is that the RWNJs here have fallen for the con. I would have a lot more respect for you if you understood what your party was really doing and supported them because you believe the ends justify the means rather than falling for their obviously insincere arguments. If you think any republicans in Washington actually believe the arguments that are being made, bless your heart.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alan Dershowitz, O.J. Simpson Dream Team member and participant in his acquittal with full knowledge that the defense narrative was not true.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

kelly09 said:

sycasey said:

kelly09 said:

sycasey said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Sperry

Paul Sperry's usual outlets:

WorldNetDaily
Wall Street Journal
Fox News
New York Post

Sounds about right.
So what?

So if you want to sincerely engage with the rest of us, bring some material from outside the right-wing media bubble.
Is there a left wing media bubble?


The GOP and their media allies would like us to think so, but not really. Facts have a liberal bias, so any outlet reporting the facts will appear liberal to RWNJs and their enablers.
Quote:

"Facts have a liberal bias" - AunBear89
Professor Turgeson Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

bearister said:


Seeking a judicial review of congressional subpoenas is NOT blocking testimony, it's following Constitutional separation of powers.
LOL
Professor Turgeson Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

NYCGOBEARS said:

oski003 said:

bearister said:




Seeking a judicial review of congressional subpoenas is NOT blocking testimony, it's following Constitutional separation of powers.

No, it's a stall tactic, obstruction of Congress and ignores the constitutional powers of Congressional oversight and impeachment powers.


Lol.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/doj-will-fight-impeachment-subpoenas-unless-trump-administration-witnesses-are-allowed-attorneys

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/474710-supreme-court-ruling-pulls-rug-out-from-under-article-of-impeachment%3famp

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/602782/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/476153-alan-dershowitz-joe-biden-is-right-and-so-was-president-trump%3famp
LOL. Alan Dershowitz.

Also:

"KIM WEHLE, a professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, is a former assistant U.S. attorney and a former associate independent counsel in the Whitewater investigation.

The right-wing media bubble rears its head again
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
President Trump has made 15,413 false or misleading claims over 1,055 days - The Washington Post


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/16/president-trump-has-made-false-or-misleading-claims-over-days/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/16/president-trump-has-made-false-or-misleading-claims-over-days/%3foutputType=amp
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lev Parnas told Rachel Maddow in a televised interview that he met with Devin Nunes "several times."



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hope that Lev has good security. He ratted them all out.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just wait until bearlyamazing shows up to magasplain all of this to us. It's going to be Hillary's or Obama's fault.
 
×
Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.