going4roses said:
Lol
Lol
going4roses said:
Lol
oski003 said:okaydo said:This Black family was pulled over for tinted windows. Then, the state took their kids. https://t.co/XD7RVnLbcW
— VICE News (@VICENews) March 18, 2023
If they took the kids solely on the basis of the parents driving in possession of marijuana, that is outrageous. I don't know why they would do that.
dajo9 said:oski003 said:okaydo said:This Black family was pulled over for tinted windows. Then, the state took their kids. https://t.co/XD7RVnLbcW
— VICE News (@VICENews) March 18, 2023
If they took the kids solely on the basis of the parents driving in possession of marijuana, that is outrageous. I don't know why they would do that.
My Father was a criminal defense attorney and a marijuana smoker. Back in the 1980s when I was in grade school I didn't know he was a regular marijuana smoker. Police visited our classroom and told us if people in our home did drugs, we should tell the police.
I, kind of innocently, told my Dad about it. He very sternly sat me down and told me if I ever turned in somebody from the home they could remove me from the family and we could lose our home. The police never told us that part. Kind of put the police in a different light for me.
going4roses said:
Lol
oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:okaydo said:This Black family was pulled over for tinted windows. Then, the state took their kids. https://t.co/XD7RVnLbcW
— VICE News (@VICENews) March 18, 2023
If they took the kids solely on the basis of the parents driving in possession of marijuana, that is outrageous. I don't know why they would do that.
My Father was a criminal defense attorney and a marijuana smoker. Back in the 1980s when I was in grade school I didn't know he was a regular marijuana smoker. Police visited our classroom and told us if people in our home did drugs, we should tell the police.
I, kind of innocently, told my Dad about it. He very sternly sat me down and told me if I ever turned in somebody from the home they could remove me from the family and we could lose our home. The police never told us that part. Kind of put the police in a different light for me.
You can't parent properly if you are high. Marijuana was more stigmatized in 1980 than 2023. Getting high around your kids is not the same thing as merely possessing marijuana.
dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:okaydo said:This Black family was pulled over for tinted windows. Then, the state took their kids. https://t.co/XD7RVnLbcW
— VICE News (@VICENews) March 18, 2023
If they took the kids solely on the basis of the parents driving in possession of marijuana, that is outrageous. I don't know why they would do that.
My Father was a criminal defense attorney and a marijuana smoker. Back in the 1980s when I was in grade school I didn't know he was a regular marijuana smoker. Police visited our classroom and told us if people in our home did drugs, we should tell the police.
I, kind of innocently, told my Dad about it. He very sternly sat me down and told me if I ever turned in somebody from the home they could remove me from the family and we could lose our home. The police never told us that part. Kind of put the police in a different light for me.
You can't parent properly if you are high. Marijuana was more stigmatized in 1980 than 2023. Getting high around your kids is not the same thing as merely possessing marijuana.
Why are you talking about people getting high around their kids from my story?
Everybody I know has been alcohol buzzed around their kids. Should they all lose them?
oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:okaydo said:This Black family was pulled over for tinted windows. Then, the state took their kids. https://t.co/XD7RVnLbcW
— VICE News (@VICENews) March 18, 2023
If they took the kids solely on the basis of the parents driving in possession of marijuana, that is outrageous. I don't know why they would do that.
My Father was a criminal defense attorney and a marijuana smoker. Back in the 1980s when I was in grade school I didn't know he was a regular marijuana smoker. Police visited our classroom and told us if people in our home did drugs, we should tell the police.
I, kind of innocently, told my Dad about it. He very sternly sat me down and told me if I ever turned in somebody from the home they could remove me from the family and we could lose our home. The police never told us that part. Kind of put the police in a different light for me.
You can't parent properly if you are high. Marijuana was more stigmatized in 1980 than 2023. Getting high around your kids is not the same thing as merely possessing marijuana.
Why are you talking about people getting high around their kids from my story?
Everybody I know has been alcohol buzzed around their kids. Should they all lose them?
Why would I not talk about getting high and watching kids from your story? That is what the State is trying to protect kids from, especially young children. When you smoke weed, you get high. With alcohol, you don't get drunk from one beer, which is acceptable. Yes, you shouldn't be buzzed or drunk if you are responsible for children, especially young ones. As long as one parent is sober at home, it shouldn't be an issue. Also, in 1980 marijuana was illegal.
The first responding officers told investigators that entering the classroom would get them killed, repeatedly referencing the fact that the rifle's bullets could penetrate their body armor, our investigation found. pic.twitter.com/YdfiGkyrOT
— Zach Despart (@zachdespart) March 20, 2023
Some politicians have taken the position that the kind of weapon used in the attack made no difference. pic.twitter.com/LQnzRSGm8l
— Zach Despart (@zachdespart) March 20, 2023
This is a story about a gun.
— Zach Despart (@zachdespart) March 20, 2023
How it was made for military use & later surged in popularity among civilians & mass shooters.
How it stopped Uvalde police in their tracks.
And how its lethality meant even a flawless response would've made little difference.https://t.co/XfUd7SSj0z
.dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:okaydo said:This Black family was pulled over for tinted windows. Then, the state took their kids. https://t.co/XD7RVnLbcW
— VICE News (@VICENews) March 18, 2023
If they took the kids solely on the basis of the parents driving in possession of marijuana, that is outrageous. I don't know why they would do that.
My Father was a criminal defense attorney and a marijuana smoker. Back in the 1980s when I was in grade school I didn't know he was a regular marijuana smoker. Police visited our classroom and told us if people in our home did drugs, we should tell the police.
I, kind of innocently, told my Dad about it. He very sternly sat me down and told me if I ever turned in somebody from the home they could remove me from the family and we could lose our home. The police never told us that part. Kind of put the police in a different light for me.
You can't parent properly if you are high. Marijuana was more stigmatized in 1980 than 2023. Getting high around your kids is not the same thing as merely possessing marijuana.
Why are you talking about people getting high around their kids from my story?
Everybody I know has been alcohol buzzed around their kids. Should they all lose them?
Why would I not talk about getting high and watching kids from your story? That is what the State is trying to protect kids from, especially young children. When you smoke weed, you get high. With alcohol, you don't get drunk from one beer, which is acceptable. Yes, you shouldn't be buzzed or drunk if you are responsible for children, especially young ones. As long as one parent is sober at home, it shouldn't be an issue. Also, in 1980 marijuana was illegal.
This is total nonsense. People get alcohol buzzed around kids all the time. If a guy smokes a joint after their kids go to bed it's no big deal. Happens all the time.
People need to stop big-stating people's lives.
oski003 said:.dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:okaydo said:This Black family was pulled over for tinted windows. Then, the state took their kids. https://t.co/XD7RVnLbcW
— VICE News (@VICENews) March 18, 2023
If they took the kids solely on the basis of the parents driving in possession of marijuana, that is outrageous. I don't know why they would do that.
My Father was a criminal defense attorney and a marijuana smoker. Back in the 1980s when I was in grade school I didn't know he was a regular marijuana smoker. Police visited our classroom and told us if people in our home did drugs, we should tell the police.
I, kind of innocently, told my Dad about it. He very sternly sat me down and told me if I ever turned in somebody from the home they could remove me from the family and we could lose our home. The police never told us that part. Kind of put the police in a different light for me.
You can't parent properly if you are high. Marijuana was more stigmatized in 1980 than 2023. Getting high around your kids is not the same thing as merely possessing marijuana.
Why are you talking about people getting high around their kids from my story?
Everybody I know has been alcohol buzzed around their kids. Should they all lose them?
Why would I not talk about getting high and watching kids from your story? That is what the State is trying to protect kids from, especially young children. When you smoke weed, you get high. With alcohol, you don't get drunk from one beer, which is acceptable. Yes, you shouldn't be buzzed or drunk if you are responsible for children, especially young ones. As long as one parent is sober at home, it shouldn't be an issue. Also, in 1980 marijuana was illegal.
This is total nonsense. People get alcohol buzzed around kids all the time. If a guy smokes a joint after their kids go to bed it's no big deal. Happens all the time.
People need to stop big-stating people's lives.
If the only adult in the house watching young kids is high on a joint (or drunk), that is messed up. It absolutely is a big deal. I am not sure what big-stating means.
dajo9 said:oski003 said:.dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:okaydo said:This Black family was pulled over for tinted windows. Then, the state took their kids. https://t.co/XD7RVnLbcW
— VICE News (@VICENews) March 18, 2023
If they took the kids solely on the basis of the parents driving in possession of marijuana, that is outrageous. I don't know why they would do that.
My Father was a criminal defense attorney and a marijuana smoker. Back in the 1980s when I was in grade school I didn't know he was a regular marijuana smoker. Police visited our classroom and told us if people in our home did drugs, we should tell the police.
I, kind of innocently, told my Dad about it. He very sternly sat me down and told me if I ever turned in somebody from the home they could remove me from the family and we could lose our home. The police never told us that part. Kind of put the police in a different light for me.
You can't parent properly if you are high. Marijuana was more stigmatized in 1980 than 2023. Getting high around your kids is not the same thing as merely possessing marijuana.
Why are you talking about people getting high around their kids from my story?
Everybody I know has been alcohol buzzed around their kids. Should they all lose them?
Why would I not talk about getting high and watching kids from your story? That is what the State is trying to protect kids from, especially young children. When you smoke weed, you get high. With alcohol, you don't get drunk from one beer, which is acceptable. Yes, you shouldn't be buzzed or drunk if you are responsible for children, especially young ones. As long as one parent is sober at home, it shouldn't be an issue. Also, in 1980 marijuana was illegal.
This is total nonsense. People get alcohol buzzed around kids all the time. If a guy smokes a joint after their kids go to bed it's no big deal. Happens all the time.
People need to stop big-stating people's lives.
If the only adult in the house watching young kids is high on a joint (or drunk), that is messed up. It absolutely is a big deal. I am not sure what big-stating means.
It happens all the time. Big-stating is people like you who want to tear apart families for bad judgment.
Cop Gets 25 Years After His Own Dept. Busted Him Running Horrifying Child Porn Ring https://t.co/lbIhwBVjIb
— Cop Crisis (@copcrisis) March 20, 2023
oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:.dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:okaydo said:This Black family was pulled over for tinted windows. Then, the state took their kids. https://t.co/XD7RVnLbcW
— VICE News (@VICENews) March 18, 2023
If they took the kids solely on the basis of the parents driving in possession of marijuana, that is outrageous. I don't know why they would do that.
My Father was a criminal defense attorney and a marijuana smoker. Back in the 1980s when I was in grade school I didn't know he was a regular marijuana smoker. Police visited our classroom and told us if people in our home did drugs, we should tell the police.
I, kind of innocently, told my Dad about it. He very sternly sat me down and told me if I ever turned in somebody from the home they could remove me from the family and we could lose our home. The police never told us that part. Kind of put the police in a different light for me.
You can't parent properly if you are high. Marijuana was more stigmatized in 1980 than 2023. Getting high around your kids is not the same thing as merely possessing marijuana.
Why are you talking about people getting high around their kids from my story?
Everybody I know has been alcohol buzzed around their kids. Should they all lose them?
Why would I not talk about getting high and watching kids from your story? That is what the State is trying to protect kids from, especially young children. When you smoke weed, you get high. With alcohol, you don't get drunk from one beer, which is acceptable. Yes, you shouldn't be buzzed or drunk if you are responsible for children, especially young ones. As long as one parent is sober at home, it shouldn't be an issue. Also, in 1980 marijuana was illegal.
This is total nonsense. People get alcohol buzzed around kids all the time. If a guy smokes a joint after their kids go to bed it's no big deal. Happens all the time.
People need to stop big-stating people's lives.
If the only adult in the house watching young kids is high on a joint (or drunk), that is messed up. It absolutely is a big deal. I am not sure what big-stating means.
It happens all the time. Big-stating is people like you who want to tear apart families for bad judgment.
People like you want to get high while watching toddlers. I can make accusations as well. See how that works?
dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:.dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:okaydo said:This Black family was pulled over for tinted windows. Then, the state took their kids. https://t.co/XD7RVnLbcW
— VICE News (@VICENews) March 18, 2023
If they took the kids solely on the basis of the parents driving in possession of marijuana, that is outrageous. I don't know why they would do that.
My Father was a criminal defense attorney and a marijuana smoker. Back in the 1980s when I was in grade school I didn't know he was a regular marijuana smoker. Police visited our classroom and told us if people in our home did drugs, we should tell the police.
I, kind of innocently, told my Dad about it. He very sternly sat me down and told me if I ever turned in somebody from the home they could remove me from the family and we could lose our home. The police never told us that part. Kind of put the police in a different light for me.
You can't parent properly if you are high. Marijuana was more stigmatized in 1980 than 2023. Getting high around your kids is not the same thing as merely possessing marijuana.
Why are you talking about people getting high around their kids from my story?
Everybody I know has been alcohol buzzed around their kids. Should they all lose them?
Why would I not talk about getting high and watching kids from your story? That is what the State is trying to protect kids from, especially young children. When you smoke weed, you get high. With alcohol, you don't get drunk from one beer, which is acceptable. Yes, you shouldn't be buzzed or drunk if you are responsible for children, especially young ones. As long as one parent is sober at home, it shouldn't be an issue. Also, in 1980 marijuana was illegal.
This is total nonsense. People get alcohol buzzed around kids all the time. If a guy smokes a joint after their kids go to bed it's no big deal. Happens all the time.
People need to stop big-stating people's lives.
If the only adult in the house watching young kids is high on a joint (or drunk), that is messed up. It absolutely is a big deal. I am not sure what big-stating means.
It happens all the time. Big-stating is people like you who want to tear apart families for bad judgment.
People like you want to get high while watching toddlers. I can make accusations as well. See how that works?
The what exactly are you saying with your state wants to protect kids talk?
11 more men framed by former detective Rey Guevara have filed civil rights lawsuits today against the City of Chicago — bringing the total to 22 pending suits.
— Melissa Segura (@MelissaDSegura) March 21, 2023
City has already paid $76 million in verdicts, settlements, lawyers for Guevara's misconducthttps://t.co/gwH5j9HxvY
The LAPD inadvertently released photos of officers working undercover assignments to Stop LAPD Spying
— L.A. TACO🌴🌮 (@LATACO) March 21, 2023
Coalition, a police watchdog group that maintains a website with the names and photos of every LAPD officer.https://t.co/TJgaPtHd0v
The last generation's white supremacists and KKK have raised their children to become our generation's police officers https://t.co/V3IL3xVNui
— Fifty Shades of Whey (@davenewworld_2) March 21, 2023
London’s police force has lost the confidence of the people it serves because it is riven with institutional racism, misogyny and homophobia and doesn’t do enough to weed out bad officers.:
— theGrio.com (@theGrio) March 22, 2023
More here. 👇🏾https://t.co/HYu2Y86VFg
Perspective: Police champions have long wielded new technology as a tool to project authority and legitimacy, while deflecting criticism.https://t.co/VfcHmQbjY6
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) March 20, 2023
The footage came from Afroman's wife and security cameras inside his home. The plaintiffs allege they have faced embarrassment, ridicule, and humiliation. https://t.co/xcOAFOpTwY
— Motherboard (@motherboard) March 23, 2023
Afroman’s house was wrongfully raided so he made a song lmfao I love him pic.twitter.com/yyT4zxJKU6
— Kendall Rae (@KendallRaeOnYT) January 6, 2023
Why Are Police Seizing People's Cars on Memphis? https://t.co/P40GubczQa pic.twitter.com/40PCEgdbBn
— The Root (@TheRoot) March 23, 2023
Only 8 out of 44 deputies are assigned to trains during weekday morning shifts and 0 our of 24 on weekends.
— Ken Bensinger (@kenbensinger) March 23, 2023
So basically cops sitting in cars outside of stations all day, which I guess is nice work if you can get it https://t.co/8waShh4058
Metro board: “Why haven’t law enforcement agencies assigned more officers to ride the system in response to [safety] concerns?”
— E/Expo Line Ledger (@expolineledger) March 22, 2023
Metro’s Chief Safety Officer: “‘I was told they weren’t going to have a bus company tell them how to deploy their resources.’” https://t.co/0CBwqgpq0M
Police jailed a deaf 71-year-old over a misunderstanding at an airport. They broke her arm and gave her Aleve for the pain while she spent 3 days in jail https://t.co/hYvpNzD6WJ
— philip lewis (@Phil_Lewis_) March 25, 2023
This is just atrocious. pic.twitter.com/9IwgCosZOx
— Austin Sanders (@daustinsanders) March 24, 2023
Just to clarify here, it was a corrections officer at the Travis County Jail that broke McGee's arm, not an Austin police officer. That said, we should ask why APD officers arrested a deaf elderly woman, alone and fearful in a confusing situation, rather than helping her.
— Austin Sanders (@daustinsanders) March 24, 2023
I've been reporting a separate story related to police training and I have been thinking a lot about this paragraph included in a consultant report about how police department's can improve cadet training. pic.twitter.com/ZiHc8pPddO
— Austin Sanders (@daustinsanders) March 24, 2023
Kansas City Police leaders allegedly ordered officers to target minority neighborhoods to meet ticket quotas — telling them to be “ready to kill everybody in the car” — and to only respond to calls for help in white neighborhoods. https://t.co/UXVyA4xa4e
— Cop Crisis (@copcrisis) March 24, 2023
AunBear89 said:
003 with "she should have complied" or words to that effect in 3…2..
AunBear89 said:
Wow - lots of equivocation in this post. Be careful, or they may take away your thin blue line flag.
oski003 said:AunBear89 said:
Wow - lots of equivocation in this post. Be careful, or they may take away your thin blue line flag.
No equivocation here. I am just trying to explain something to someone with no clue the difficulties of policing in a woke environment where you are hated and presumed to have bad intentions.
"With the release of the information, the owner of the ''killer cops'' website was able to download the sensitive material and post it online, placing bounties on the officers whose information were shared, according to LAPPL President Craig Lally."
https://kiisfm.iheart.com/featured/la-local-news/content/2023-03-24-the-la-police-protective-league-sues-owner-of-police-bounty-website/
I thought it was common knowledge not to cross train tracks when the lights are still flashing... pic.twitter.com/zdTLdNl5Yp
— QENNY Southside (@AKBrews) March 26, 2023