A perfect example of your use of biased social media sources.Cal88 said:⚡️🇺🇸🇮🇱JUST IN:
— Suppressed News. (@SuppressedNws) August 6, 2025
U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen strongly denied claims that Hamas is systematically stealing aid in Gaza, calling it “a big lie.”
He emphasized that multiple international organizations, including USAID, have rejected these accusations.
Van Hollen accused the… pic.twitter.com/B3k2vDrU6a
U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen strongly denied claims that Hamas is systematically stealing aid in Gaza, calling it "a big lie."
He emphasized that multiple international organizations, including USAID, have rejected these accusations.
Van Hollen accused the Israeli and U.S. governments of spreading this false narrative to justify using food as a weapon of war.
Watch the video. Van Hollen says the claim that aid was "systematically DIVERTED" is false. Diverted is the key word. That word means the UN is alleged to have intentionally given aid to Hamas instead of Palestinian civilians. THAT allegation may well be false.
But your post from Supressed News changes the words "systematically DIVERTED" to "systematically STEALING", which changes the entire the meaning of the video to one in which a US Senator claims Hamas is not taking food. That tactic by Suppressed News is dishonest - probably intentionally so. They get away with it because they are part of the echo chamber where critical thought is replaced by any-Israeli hatred. The message delivered about Hamas stealing aid is patently and absurdly false.