Official Biden / Harris Administration Thread

190,745 Views | 2519 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by bear2034
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HawaiiBear33 said:


You are always wrong

VOTE BLUE
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HawaiiBear33 said:




ISN'T THIS ILLEGAL??
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
> VOTE BLUE

# voteblue2
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

HawaiiBear33 said:




ISN'T THIS ILLEGAL??
Vanderbilt and Kaiser call bs on this claim

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/republicans-claim-biden-cut-medicare-billions-experts-case/story?id=97286257


VOTE BLUE
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

movielover said:

HawaiiBear33 said:




ISN'T THIS ILLEGAL??
Vanderbilt and Kaiser call bs on this claim

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/republicans-claim-biden-cut-medicare-billions-experts-case/story?id=97286257


VOTE BLUE
It's on the Internet. It must be true.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

The dementia patient had better polling numbers before the Democrats overthrew him.
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


The dementia patient had better polling numbers before the Democrats overthrew him.
Dementia Patient put the arm on his most Holy and majestic Obama at Ethel Kennedy's funeral. His Holiness was not pleased.
Why does this scene remind me of Michael Corleone's baptism segment.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13968177/barack-obama-joe-biden-funeral-conversation.html
"Just win, baby."
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


The dementia patient had better polling numbers before the Democrats overthrew himShow u
Show us that info
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


The dementia patient had better polling numbers before the Democrats overthrew him.

No, he didn't.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

HawaiiBear33 said:


You are always wrong

VOTE BLUE


You are always wrong

VOTE FOR THE BEST CANDIDATE REGARDLESS OF PARTY
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Best never comes from the Repug Party of MTG, Trump, Cruz, Gaetz and Boebert
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Best never comes from the Repug Party of MTG, Trump, Cruz, Gaetz and Boebert


I really wish it didn't.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds like you're still beholden to party. Try to move past your tribalism. Only a cult member would think Trump is the better candidate.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

SBGold said:

Best never comes from the Repug Party of MTG, Trump, Cruz, Gaetz and Boebert


I really wish it didn't.
Correct!
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Sounds like you're still beholden to party. Try to move past your tribalism. Only a cult member would think Trump is the better candidate.


That is a poor conclusion from my statement. I wish Kamala was a clear better alternative to the Republican candidate. Unfortunately, she sucks.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Excellent example of tribalistic thinking. Unless you can explain how Kamala sucks.

Please use real facts and not Trump GOP talking points and sound bites.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Excellent example of tribalistic thinking. Unless you can explain how Kamala sucks.

Please use real facts and not Trump GOP talking points and sound bites.
Kamala has showed very little in any of her jobs. Unfortunately, Trump isn't much better. And Trumpers please don't waste your time with the lists. Thankfully no one will be able to share any of Kamala's lists.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

bear2034 said:


The dementia patient had better polling numbers before the Democrats overthrew himShow u
Show us that info

Kamala's candidacy is a meme coin or a meme stock.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

SBGold said:

bear2034 said:


The dementia patient had better polling numbers before the Democrats overthrew himShow u
Show us that info

Kamala's candidacy is a meme coin or a meme stock.
Dogedesigner tweet meme as a source, lmao

Man, you all are really allergic to the fact checking, oy vey

VOTE BLUE
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

bear2034 said:

SBGold said:

bear2034 said:


The dementia patient had better polling numbers before the Democrats overthrew himShow u
Show us that info

Kamala's candidacy is a meme coin or a meme stock.
Dogedesigner tweet meme as a source, lmao

Man, you all are really allergic to the fact checking, oy vey

VOTE BLUE
I wasn't fact checking, I'm meme-ing.

BLUE WASN'T ELECTED.
BLUE WAS SELECTED.

AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

AunBear89 said:

Excellent example of tribalistic thinking. Unless you can explain how Kamala sucks.

Please use real facts and not Trump GOP talking points and sound bites.
Kamala has showed very little in any of her jobs. Unfortunately, Trump isn't much better. And Trumpers please don't waste your time with the lists. Thankfully no one will be able to share any of Kamala's lists.


You are just repeating talking points and sound bites. No different than 2034 or movielover or the sources they rely on. You don't post memes or tweets, but your opinions are the same. "Has showed very little"? I guess what you regard as very little was sufficient for voters to elect her to higher positions each step of the way.


"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

AunBear89 said:

Excellent example of tribalistic thinking. Unless you can explain how Kamala sucks.

Please use real facts and not Trump GOP talking points and sound bites.
Kamala has showed very little in any of her jobs. Unfortunately, Trump isn't much better. And Trumpers please don't waste your time with the lists. Thankfully no one will be able to share any of Kamala's lists.


You are just repeating talking points and sound bites. No different than 2034 or movielover or the sources they rely on. You don't post memes or tweets, but your opinions are the same. "Has showed very little"? I guess what you regard as very little was sufficient for voters to elect her to higher positions each step of the way.



I hate Trump. Not the same. She was not elected VP or P candidate. A Dem getting any position in CA is not very difficult. The OrangeMan was in fact elected to the highest office. But I get it. Anyone but Trump. My best friend will vote for a dead corpse over Trump. He has told me this over our weekly lunch. He is one of my closest friends in the world. Shared a cubicle with him for 20 years where we built some of the phone company's first AI systems to run their records and billing mainframe systems.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

A Dem getting any position in CA is not very difficult.
There's still a primary process and it is indeed difficult to beat out the other Dems.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

82gradDLSdad said:

A Dem getting any position in CA is not very difficult.
There's still a primary process and it is indeed difficult to beat out the other Dems.


I'm tapping out on this one. He has heard in his news bubble that she did nothing in any of her jobs. Even though he lives in California and has ample evidence of what she has done. So now that is his truth. Lots of Republican voters just like him: they eat everything they are told by the party, not even bothering to form their own opinions. They will accuse Democrats of the same, but in one party it's a flaw (Democratic party), in the other, it's a feature (today's GQP).
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

sycasey said:

82gradDLSdad said:

A Dem getting any position in CA is not very difficult.
There's still a primary process and it is indeed difficult to beat out the other Dems.


I'm tapping out on this one. He has heard in his news bubble that she did nothing in any of her jobs. Even though he lives in California and has ample evidence of what she has done. So now that is his truth. Lots of Republican voters just like him: they eat everything they are told by the party, not even bothering to form their own opinions. They will accuse Democrats of the same, but in one party it's a flaw (Democratic party), in the other, it's a feature (today's GQP).
Citing that Trump has experience because he was elected President -- even though when he was first elected President he was by far the most inexperienced major candidate ever nominated for that office -- is some impressive circular logic.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

AunBear89 said:

sycasey said:

82gradDLSdad said:

A Dem getting any position in CA is not very difficult.
There's still a primary process and it is indeed difficult to beat out the other Dems.


I'm tapping out on this one. He has heard in his news bubble that she did nothing in any of her jobs. Even though he lives in California and has ample evidence of what she has done. So now that is his truth. Lots of Republican voters just like him: they eat everything they are told by the party, not even bothering to form their own opinions. They will accuse Democrats of the same, but in one party it's a flaw (Democratic party), in the other, it's a feature (today's GQP).
Citing that Trump has experience because he was elected President -- even though when he was first elected President he was by far the most inexperienced major candidate ever nominated for that office -- is some impressive circular logic.
My response was in regards to getting elected to a high office. You can't see that getting elected as President is a bit more impressive than a Dem getting elected to DA and the senator in CA?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

sycasey said:

AunBear89 said:

sycasey said:

82gradDLSdad said:

A Dem getting any position in CA is not very difficult.
There's still a primary process and it is indeed difficult to beat out the other Dems.


I'm tapping out on this one. He has heard in his news bubble that she did nothing in any of her jobs. Even though he lives in California and has ample evidence of what she has done. So now that is his truth. Lots of Republican voters just like him: they eat everything they are told by the party, not even bothering to form their own opinions. They will accuse Democrats of the same, but in one party it's a flaw (Democratic party), in the other, it's a feature (today's GQP).
Citing that Trump has experience because he was elected President -- even though when he was first elected President he was by far the most inexperienced major candidate ever nominated for that office -- is some impressive circular logic.
My response was in regards to getting elected to a high office. You can't see that getting elected as President is a bit more impressive than a Dem getting elected to DA and the senator in CA?
But so what? Everyone who wants to first get elected President has to start from somewhere.

Being an AG and a Senator and a VP is a more than adequate resume. Trump literally had none of that in 2016. He was just a celebrity businessman.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

<snip>Trump literally had none of that in 2016. He was just a celebrity businessman.


And a bad one, at that. With multiple failed businesses, bankruptcies, and unpaid contractors, suppliers, and employees!

But he had a successful tv show!
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You guys are happy with the most liberal senator. I am not. Still won't vote Orange as long as Kamala quits talking. But I won't vote for her in any event. If she has a good presidency maybe I'll change my mind. Oh wait, not my tribe.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Little do you all know, I'm also a professional lip reader:

BIDEN: I can handle things, I'm smart, not like everybody says.
OBAMA: Joe, you're my VP. But don't ever take sides against me ever again.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

You guys are happy with the most liberal senator. I am not. Still won't vote Orange as long as Kamala quits talking. But I won't vote for her in any event. If she has a good presidency maybe I'll change my mind. Oh wait, not my tribe.
If you dislike her policies or ideology then fine. But that's a different argument from saying she lacks experience or qualifications.
Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

82gradDLSdad said:

You guys are happy with the most liberal senator. I am not. Still won't vote Orange as long as Kamala quits talking. But I won't vote for her in any event. If she has a good presidency maybe I'll change my mind. Oh wait, not my tribe.
If you dislike her policies or ideology then fine. But that's a different argument from saying she lacks experience or qualifications.


She's a filthy wh ore. That's enough for me.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

sycasey said:

82gradDLSdad said:

You guys are happy with the most liberal senator. I am not. Still won't vote Orange as long as Kamala quits talking. But I won't vote for her in any event. If she has a good presidency maybe I'll change my mind. Oh wait, not my tribe.
If you dislike her policies or ideology then fine. But that's a different argument from saying she lacks experience or qualifications.


She's a filthy wh ore. That's enough for me.

As opposed to Donald Trump, who definitely was not.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

82gradDLSdad said:

You guys are happy with the most liberal senator. I am not. Still won't vote Orange as long as Kamala quits talking. But I won't vote for her in any event. If she has a good presidency maybe I'll change my mind. Oh wait, not my tribe.
If you dislike her policies or ideology then fine. But that's a different argument from saying she lacks experience or qualifications.


Doesn't lack experience. And by that I mean lots of impressive titles. I know a lot of people that get hired for important positions based on that.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.