Official Biden / Harris Administration Thread

209,733 Views | 2597 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Eastern Oregon Bear
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Beautiful false equivalency! Chef's kiss!

Insulting a weird, slimy white guy is EXACTLY the same as insulting and disparaging an entire group of immigrants from a country.


Do you have a mancrush on Oski003?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

He's going to do it.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Obama talking about a "Puppet Presidency" and how he would be fine with being the one behind the scenes conducting the moves of a "stand-in frontman or front woman" as President.

"Just a funny coincidence, I'm sure."

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Where's Jill Biden to whisk Joe away? Where are all the staffers? They don't care anymore.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She got the best of him in that exchange. She bobbed and weaved with regard to his Cheney question and then pegged him with an uppercut.

The Invasion of Iraq was pretextual. Cheney is a war criminal.

Nancy Pelosi voted against the invasion.

tRump on Stern:

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
> Also, LOLOLOLOL

dear "Dick Cheney Democrats" puppet master..
thanks to your latest disposable handle [ shelf-life ~week? ] i've bumped
my ignore list to an all time max..
> Ignoring 338 users

signed, a decades long (and arguably senile) poster formerly known as cupertino jay

muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Dajo fantasy bites the dust. Even a broken clock is more reliable.

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

Another Dajo fantasy bites the dust. Even a broken clock is more reliable.




More misinformation. This is lying about a temporary disruption in reporting to the FBI caused by a system change. Notice the map is of 2022.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
> More misinformation. This is lying about a temporary disruption in reporting to the FBI caused by a system change. Notice the map is of 2022.

you're right dajo; hide the pickle is our in-house troll army's literal signature move.
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First of all, you provided no evidence that the non-reporting was temporary or that the data is again required, not optional. Further, you have not dealt with the issue of underreporting and downgrading of crime as described in the tweet. We see anecdotes of this happening every single day as well as of migrant crime which was dramatically lower during the Trump administration for obvious reasons. None of this is proof that crime is up, but your repeated assertion that crime is down, that we are living in some golden age of tranquility, based on sketchy data from the Ministry of Truth is laughable.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

First of all, you provided no evidence that the non-reporting was temporary or that the data is again required, not optional. Further, you have not dealt with the issue of underreporting and downgrading of crime as described in the tweet. We see anecdotes of this happening every single day as well as of migrant crime which was dramatically lower during the Trump administration for obvious reasons. None of this is proof that crime is up, but your repeated assertion that crime is down, that we are living in some golden age of tranquility, based on sketchy data from the Ministry of Truth is laughable.


Sorry but the burden of proof is on the accuser, not me. An out of context map from 2022 is nothing.

Here is the data. Crime is on track to be down 26% from the 2020 Trump crime surge.
https://www.threads.net/@liberalsarecool/post/C_1TFFORB2v/?xmt=AQGzB3lHZ43FFayW4k1l7HfZAFKho4Dlw5fyLTFCrR1kRw
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Once again, you ignore the arguments and present a chart with no supporting explanations or granular breakdown. Believe whatever you want. The rest of us, who actually observe what is going on and use our reasoning, know that a 26% drop in crime is not remotely accurate.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

Once again, you ignore the arguments and present a chart with no supporting explanations or granular breakdown. Believe whatever you want. The rest of us, who actually observe what is going on and use our reasoning, know that a 26% drop in crime is not remotely accurate.


Yes, I ignore arguments from MAGAts on Twitter with names like amuse who post old, out of context, out of date data and a bunch of unsupported conjecture and accusations. That's what smart people do.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
unsupported conjecture and accusations

Stores closing because of theft isn't conjecture. All the migrant crime is documented.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

unsupported conjecture and accusations

Stores closing because of theft isn't conjecture. All the migrant crime is documented.


Companies used theft as an excuse for poor management decisions and low sales
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/19/target-store-closures-theft-and-crime-higher-nearby.html
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don Surbur: "Now that Putin, Cheney and Taylor Swift endorsed her [Comrade Kamala], whose endorsement will she seek next?"

Kim Jong Un

Meghan Markle"
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

unsupported conjecture and accusations

Stores closing because of theft isn't conjecture. All the migrant crime is documented.


Some of it. Major cities aren't turning in crime data to a new FBI [rigged] database.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
thanks for the link. cupertino's target is our favorite supplier of stuff, most often using their Will Call pickup option.
Quote:

There was just one problem with the explanation Target gave for closing stores: The locations it shuttered generally saw fewer reported crimes than others it chose to keep open nearby, a monthslong CNBC investigation has found.

CNBC's findings cast doubt on Target's explanation and raise questions about whether the company's announcement was designed to advance its legislative agenda seeking a crackdown on organized retail crime and to obscure poor financial performance at the stores as it grapples with sliding sales.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And gee, might not rampant crime scare seniors and mothers to order goods online from Amazon and Safeway?
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

And gee, might not rampant crime scare seniors and mothers to order goods online from Amazon and Safeway?
# shrugs
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Asked how she would specifically bring down prices, she talks about cutting lawns.

And does she seem buzzed again?

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is hard to watch. Kamala had 4 years to memorize talking points. She doesn't have to believe what she says, she just has to memorize left wing talking points and say it in a way to convince herself.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New York Post: Pennsylvania bakery's 'cookie poll' between Trump and Harris has clear winner: 'People are upset'

"As of Friday morning, the shop has sold a whopping 5,200 Trump cookies vs. 500 Harris cookies."
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Speaking of cookies, in Haiti, they eat dirt cookies made out of a mixture of dirt, lard, and salt.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

It's a little strange that Dick Cheney would come out to say he's voting for Kamala. I don't remember him saying this about Biden.
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


It's a little strange that Dick Cheney would come out to say he's voting for Kamala. I don't remember him saying this about Biden.
Solidarity with his primaried daughter.
"Just win, baby."
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The MSM was all over Cheney and Haliburton for years... but here Blackrock staffed the White House, top officials had top WH roles, Blackrock and affiliates are gobbling up Ukranian land, it will allegedly help rebuild Ukraine... and they say nothing.

So much for a free press.
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

The MSM was all over Cheney and Haliburton for years... but here Blackrock staffed the White House, top officials had top WH roles, Blackrock and affiliates are gobbling up Ukranian land, it will allegedly help rebuild Ukraine... and they say nothing.

So much for a free press.
Yeah, Bush and Cheney have both revealed themselves to be opportunistic globalists. It's telling that they find more kindred politics amongst the present Administration than supporting "the bad Orange Man."

But, yes, MSM were witch-hunting the Bush Admin and look how they softball- every-single-Demo-Admin. "Blackrock, who? What? Conspiracy theories?"
"Just win, baby."
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are both culpable.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did Reich know and just expressed faux outrage over a non-story to deflect attention from Biden/Harris' abysmal record on inflation? Or is he just ignorant and lazy?



movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In 2022, according to Transparent California, Reich made....

$385,529.00

in salary and benefits.

https://transparentcalifornia.com/salaries/2022/university-of-california/robert-reich/
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BFD.

There are deputy city manager's in San Jose that dont do **** and made $361,000 last year plus benefits.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

Did Reich know and just expressed faux outrage over a non-story to deflect attention from Biden/Harris' abysmal record on inflation? Or is he just ignorant and lazy?




Bob is still trying so hard to be relevant, again, and at risk of outing his Marxist core beliefs.
"Just win, baby."
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This quote from Kamala is jarring. Reminder: Facebook is the platform of state-directed censorship as admitted by Zuck himself. X is the platform of free speech. Try to imagine a world where President Trump directs X to censor the Left and threatens to do the same to Facebook, NYT, CNN, Google, etc.

Who's the threat to democracy?

Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

This quote from Kamala is jarring. Reminder: Facebook is the platform of state-directed censorship as admitted by Zuck himself. X is the platform of free speech. Try to imagine a world where President Trump directs X to censor the Left and threatens to do the same to Facebook, NYT, CNN, Google, etc.

Who's the threat to democracy?


Well said.
Typically, the Left hides in plain sight and accuses everyone else of exactly what they, themselves, plan. Where it becomes a tangled, polarized standoff, is many ordinary Democrats are stuck defending their lifelong loyalty to the Democratic Party. Virtuous loyalty, while a destructive, scheming Left extreme has used the kind virtues of the mainstream Party to provide cover for the radical, Marxist agenda. An agenda they couch with positive, sing-song phrases that lull many into a sleepy acceptance of an agenda, well-hidden and, ultimately destructive.

Do I think the majority Democrats seek the destruction of our Constitutional Republic? No, but the road to such is paved with flowery platitudes and good intentions. Far better would be a reawakening of and better understanding between the mainstream parties to recognize existential threats to us all. Is Trump's polemics a problem? Could be, I am willing to examine that. But as long as both sides bicker, I must wonder what threats we are ignoring and who benefits.

Now, we wait for the same tiresome automatic responses that amount to little more than mere contradiction.

TDS says what?

"<insert Orange Man bad here>, but Dick Cheney, of all people, is okay."

"Just win, baby."
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.