Official Biden / Harris Administration Thread

181,000 Views | 2459 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by movielover
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AunBear89 • 11:36a, 9/10/24
AunBear89 said:
Beautiful false equivalency! Chef's kiss!

Insulting a weird, slimy white guy is EXACTLY the same as insulting and disparaging an entire group of immigrants from a country.


Do you have a mancrush on Oski003?
Reply Quote
2
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:05p, 9/10/24

He's going to do it.
Reply Quote
2
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:43p, 9/11/24
"Obama talking about a "Puppet Presidency" and how he would be fine with being the one behind the scenes conducting the moves of a "stand-in frontman or front woman" as President.

"Just a funny coincidence, I'm sure."

Reply Quote
4
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:44p, 9/12/24

Where's Jill Biden to whisk Joe away? Where are all the staffers? They don't care anymore.
Reply Quote
4
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Dick Cheney Democrats • 1:57p, 9/12/24
She got the best of him in that exchange. She bobbed and weaved with regard to his Cheney question and then pegged him with an uppercut.

The Invasion of Iraq was pretextual. Cheney is a war criminal.

Nancy Pelosi voted against the invasion.

tRump on Stern:

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Reply Quote
2
smh
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Dick Cheney Democrats • 2:03p, 9/12/24
> Also, LOLOLOLOL

dear "Dick Cheney Democrats" puppet master..
thanks to your latest disposable handle [ shelf-life ~week? ] i've bumped
my ignore list to an all time max..
> Ignoring 338 users

signed, a decades long (and arguably senile) poster formerly known as cupertino jay

muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Zippergate
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:04p, 9/12/24
Another Dajo fantasy bites the dust. Even a broken clock is more reliable.

Reply Quote
4
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zippergate • 2:12p, 9/12/24
Zippergate said:
Another Dajo fantasy bites the dust. Even a broken clock is more reliable.



More misinformation. This is lying about a temporary disruption in reporting to the FBI caused by a system change. Notice the map is of 2022.
"The rules were that you were not going to fact check"
MAGA
Reply Quote
4
smh
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 2:31p, 9/12/24
> More misinformation. This is lying about a temporary disruption in reporting to the FBI caused by a system change. Notice the map is of 2022.

you're right dajo; hide the pickle is our in-house troll army's literal signature move.
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
Zippergate
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 6:16p, 9/12/24
First of all, you provided no evidence that the non-reporting was temporary or that the data is again required, not optional. Further, you have not dealt with the issue of underreporting and downgrading of crime as described in the tweet. We see anecdotes of this happening every single day as well as of migrant crime which was dramatically lower during the Trump administration for obvious reasons. None of this is proof that crime is up, but your repeated assertion that crime is down, that we are living in some golden age of tranquility, based on sketchy data from the Ministry of Truth is laughable.
Reply Quote
4
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zippergate • 6:25p, 9/12/24
Zippergate said:
First of all, you provided no evidence that the non-reporting was temporary or that the data is again required, not optional. Further, you have not dealt with the issue of underreporting and downgrading of crime as described in the tweet. We see anecdotes of this happening every single day as well as of migrant crime which was dramatically lower during the Trump administration for obvious reasons. None of this is proof that crime is up, but your repeated assertion that crime is down, that we are living in some golden age of tranquility, based on sketchy data from the Ministry of Truth is laughable.


Sorry but the burden of proof is on the accuser, not me. An out of context map from 2022 is nothing.

Here is the data. Crime is on track to be down 26% from the 2020 Trump crime surge.
https://www.threads.net/@liberalsarecool/post/C_1TFFORB2v/?xmt=AQGzB3lHZ43FFayW4k1l7HfZAFKho4Dlw5fyLTFCrR1kRw
"The rules were that you were not going to fact check"
MAGA
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Zippergate
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 6:37p, 9/12/24
Once again, you ignore the arguments and present a chart with no supporting explanations or granular breakdown. Believe whatever you want. The rest of us, who actually observe what is going on and use our reasoning, know that a 26% drop in crime is not remotely accurate.
Reply Quote
6
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zippergate • 6:44p, 9/12/24
Zippergate said:
Once again, you ignore the arguments and present a chart with no supporting explanations or granular breakdown. Believe whatever you want. The rest of us, who actually observe what is going on and use our reasoning, know that a 26% drop in crime is not remotely accurate.


Yes, I ignore arguments from MAGAts on Twitter with names like amuse who post old, out of context, out of date data and a bunch of unsupported conjecture and accusations. That's what smart people do.
"The rules were that you were not going to fact check"
MAGA
Reply Quote
3
Zippergate
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 7:42p, 9/12/24
unsupported conjecture and accusations

Stores closing because of theft isn't conjecture. All the migrant crime is documented.
Reply Quote
6
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zippergate • 2:50a, 9/13/24
Zippergate said:
unsupported conjecture and accusations

Stores closing because of theft isn't conjecture. All the migrant crime is documented.


Companies used theft as an excuse for poor management decisions and low sales
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/19/target-store-closures-theft-and-crime-higher-nearby.html
"The rules were that you were not going to fact check"
MAGA
Reply Quote
4
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:05a, 9/13/24
Don Surbur: "Now that Putin, Cheney and Taylor Swift endorsed her [Comrade Kamala], whose endorsement will she seek next?"

Kim Jong Un

Meghan Markle"
Reply Quote
3
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zippergate • 10:07a, 9/13/24
Zippergate said:
unsupported conjecture and accusations

Stores closing because of theft isn't conjecture. All the migrant crime is documented.


Some of it. Major cities aren't turning in crime data to a new FBI [rigged] database.
Reply Quote
5
smh
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 10:41a, 9/13/24
thanks for the link. cupertino's target is our favorite supplier of stuff, most often using their Will Call pickup option.
Quote:
There was just one problem with the explanation Target gave for closing stores: The locations it shuttered generally saw fewer reported crimes than others it chose to keep open nearby, a monthslong CNBC investigation has found.

CNBC's findings cast doubt on Target's explanation and raise questions about whether the company's announcement was designed to advance its legislative agenda seeking a crackdown on organized retail crime and to obscure poor financial performance at the stores as it grapples with sliding sales.
Reply Quote
2 edits
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to smh • 10:51a, 9/13/24
And gee, might not rampant crime scare seniors and mothers to order goods online from Amazon and Safeway?
Reply Quote
3
smh
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 10:56a, 9/13/24
movielover said:
And gee, might not rampant crime scare seniors and mothers to order goods online from Amazon and Safeway?
# shrugs
Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:54p, 9/13/24


Asked how she would specifically bring down prices, she talks about cutting lawns.

And does she seem buzzed again?

Reply Quote
4
1 edit
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 11:05p, 9/13/24
This is hard to watch. Kamala had 4 years to memorize talking points. She doesn't have to believe what she says, she just has to memorize left wing talking points and say it in a way to convince herself.
Reply Quote
3
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:19a, 9/15/24
New York Post: Pennsylvania bakery's 'cookie poll' between Trump and Harris has clear winner: 'People are upset'

"As of Friday morning, the shop has sold a whopping 5,200 Trump cookies vs. 500 Harris cookies."
Reply Quote
4
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 2:45p, 9/15/24
Speaking of cookies, in Haiti, they eat dirt cookies made out of a mixture of dirt, lard, and salt.
Reply Quote
2
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:44p, 9/15/24

It's a little strange that Dick Cheney would come out to say he's voting for Kamala. I don't remember him saying this about Biden.
Reply Quote
3
Bowlesman80
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bear2034 • 6:22p, 9/15/24
bear2034 said:

It's a little strange that Dick Cheney would come out to say he's voting for Kamala. I don't remember him saying this about Biden.
Solidarity with his primaried daughter.
"Just win, baby."
Reply Quote
4
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bowlesman80 • 6:32p, 9/15/24
The MSM was all over Cheney and Haliburton for years... but here Blackrock staffed the White House, top officials had top WH roles, Blackrock and affiliates are gobbling up Ukranian land, it will allegedly help rebuild Ukraine... and they say nothing.

So much for a free press.
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Bowlesman80
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 6:43p, 9/15/24
movielover said:
The MSM was all over Cheney and Haliburton for years... but here Blackrock staffed the White House, top officials had top WH roles, Blackrock and affiliates are gobbling up Ukranian land, it will allegedly help rebuild Ukraine... and they say nothing.

So much for a free press.
Yeah, Bush and Cheney have both revealed themselves to be opportunistic globalists. It's telling that they find more kindred politics amongst the present Administration than supporting "the bad Orange Man."

But, yes, MSM were witch-hunting the Bush Admin and look how they softball- every-single-Demo-Admin. "Blackrock, who? What? Conspiracy theories?"
"Just win, baby."
Reply Quote
3
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:47p, 9/16/24

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are both culpable.
Reply Quote
4
Zippergate
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:04p, 9/16/24
Did Reich know and just expressed faux outrage over a non-story to deflect attention from Biden/Harris' abysmal record on inflation? Or is he just ignorant and lazy?



Reply Quote
4
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zippergate • 6:20p, 9/16/24
In 2022, according to Transparent California, Reich made....

$385,529.00

in salary and benefits.

https://transparentcalifornia.com/salaries/2022/university-of-california/robert-reich/
Reply Quote
3
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 6:24p, 9/16/24
BFD.

There are deputy city manager's in San Jose that dont do **** and made $361,000 last year plus benefits.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
2
Bowlesman80
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zippergate • 6:46a, 9/17/24
Zippergate said:
Did Reich know and just expressed faux outrage over a non-story to deflect attention from Biden/Harris' abysmal record on inflation? Or is he just ignorant and lazy?



Bob is still trying so hard to be relevant, again, and at risk of outing his Marxist core beliefs.
"Just win, baby."
Reply Quote
2
Zippergate
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:43a, 9/17/24
This quote from Kamala is jarring. Reminder: Facebook is the platform of state-directed censorship as admitted by Zuck himself. X is the platform of free speech. Try to imagine a world where President Trump directs X to censor the Left and threatens to do the same to Facebook, NYT, CNN, Google, etc.

Who's the threat to democracy?

Reply Quote
6
Bowlesman80
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zippergate • 10:29a, 9/17/24
Zippergate said:
This quote from Kamala is jarring. Reminder: Facebook is the platform of state-directed censorship as admitted by Zuck himself. X is the platform of free speech. Try to imagine a world where President Trump directs X to censor the Left and threatens to do the same to Facebook, NYT, CNN, Google, etc.

Who's the threat to democracy?

Well said.
Typically, the Left hides in plain sight and accuses everyone else of exactly what they, themselves, plan. Where it becomes a tangled, polarized standoff, is many ordinary Democrats are stuck defending their lifelong loyalty to the Democratic Party. Virtuous loyalty, while a destructive, scheming Left extreme has used the kind virtues of the mainstream Party to provide cover for the radical, Marxist agenda. An agenda they couch with positive, sing-song phrases that lull many into a sleepy acceptance of an agenda, well-hidden and, ultimately destructive.

Do I think the majority Democrats seek the destruction of our Constitutional Republic? No, but the road to such is paved with flowery platitudes and good intentions. Far better would be a reawakening of and better understanding between the mainstream parties to recognize existential threats to us all. Is Trump's polemics a problem? Could be, I am willing to examine that. But as long as both sides bicker, I must wonder what threats we are ignoring and who benefits.

Now, we wait for the same tiresome automatic responses that amount to little more than mere contradiction.

TDS says what?

"<insert Orange Man bad here>, but Dick Cheney, of all people, is okay."

"Just win, baby."
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.