Matthew Patel said:
BearNIt said:
Matthew Patel said:
BearNIt said:
Matthew Patel said:
BearNIt said:
Matthew Patel said:
AunBear89 said:
Nooo, they didn't. As you wrote earlier, the Electoral College did - and that is NOT the American People, no matter how you slice or spin.
The American people voted 48.2% to 46.1% Clinton over Trump. 2.9 million votes.
See, logic and facts aren't that hard - you should try some with your knee-jerk emotions.
The electors cast their votes the way the American people told them to. The people elected the president. He earned his victory.
With a little help from his friend Puty.
Russians spreading information vs. Americans spreading misinformation. It's all misinformation.
In terms of conspiracy, zero. None. Nada.
And yet the U.S. Intelligence Agencies affirmed the belief that Russia did things to help their preferred candidate, Congress investigated and indicated that the Russians interfered in the 2016 elections, and Mueller's investigation also said Russia had a clear choice on who they wanted to win and acted in ways to help that choice.
Yes. But that still doesn't equal conspiracy.
And that's the part that keeps tripping you up.
I'm okay with making that leap given Captain Catastrophe's herculean efforts to prevent the truth from coming out. Innocent people don't prevent information from seeing the light of day.
But he didn't. Mueller completed and released his report and it was rather thorough.
He established that Stone had no prior knowledge of any Wikileaks material.
He established that most of the meetings between Trump officials and Russian representatives were about Trump Tower in Moscow, with a few (Flynn in particular) being about lifting of sanctions.
What you continually establish is that you've never read the report.
I'm willing to wait till the next POTUS gets his hands on Assange and all the information comes out. There was information missing that will come to light. By the way, I read the report when it was released to the public.
The New York Times:
April 29, 2020:
WASHINGTON One of the enduring mysteries left unsolved by the Mueller inquiry was whether
Roger J. Stone Jr., President Trump's longtime friend and political adviser, ever communicated during the 2016 presidential campaign with Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks.
Federal investigators chased the question for months to figure out who, if anyone, in Mr. Trump's world knew that WikiLeaks was going to release a trove of damaging Democratic emails in an effort to bolster his chances of winning.
Correction: May 14, 2020
An earlier version of this article referred incorrectly to the response of the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, to the special counsel's inquiry. He did not refuse to cooperate; his lawyers said that investigators on that team never contacted him.
Seems to me that we still have some unanswered questions that were never asked so again, I'll wait till we get our hands on Assange.