AunBear89 said:
Reagan couldn't turn a phrase if his life depended on it. He COULD hit his mark, read his lines, smile at the camera, and then walk off set as the director yelled "Cut! That's a wrap!"
Assigning any agency or authority to him for any of his administration's actions is just silly.
BearForce2 said:Big C said:BearForce2 said:
Reagan could really turn a phrase and persuade people. Unfortunately, he sold the idea that the only way to deal with a government that seemed bloated and inefficient was to dismantle it, rather than putting in the hard work to improve it. Streamline it, sure. Blow it up, probably not.
The purpose of government is to make people's lives better. If it is not doing the job, fix it.
Where do you get this idea that the purpose of government is to improve people's lives?
I'd say making and enforcing laws to keep order and the country safe is a good place to start. I suppose this does help contribute to improving people's lives by making a society functional. However, government has that uncanny ability to mess things up using other people's money.Big C said:BearForce2 said:Big C said:BearForce2 said:
Reagan could really turn a phrase and persuade people. Unfortunately, he sold the idea that the only way to deal with a government that seemed bloated and inefficient was to dismantle it, rather than putting in the hard work to improve it. Streamline it, sure. Blow it up, probably not.
The purpose of government is to make people's lives better. If it is not doing the job, fix it.
Where do you get this idea that the purpose of government is to improve people's lives?
I heard a highly regarded teacher say it. It made sense to me and stuck. Obviously, governments do not always achieve their intended purpose, but they should strive to do that. Governments are supposed to help a bunch of people accomplish things for the common good that they could not do individually.
What do you think the purpose of government is?
Who do you think pays for law enforcement salaries?BearForce2 said:I'd say making and enforcing laws to keep order and the country safe is a good place to start. I suppose this does help contribute to improving people's lives by making a society functional. However, government has that uncanny ability to mess things up using other people's money.Big C said:BearForce2 said:Big C said:BearForce2 said:
Reagan could really turn a phrase and persuade people. Unfortunately, he sold the idea that the only way to deal with a government that seemed bloated and inefficient was to dismantle it, rather than putting in the hard work to improve it. Streamline it, sure. Blow it up, probably not.
The purpose of government is to make people's lives better. If it is not doing the job, fix it.
Where do you get this idea that the purpose of government is to improve people's lives?
I heard a highly regarded teacher say it. It made sense to me and stuck. Obviously, governments do not always achieve their intended purpose, but they should strive to do that. Governments are supposed to help a bunch of people accomplish things for the common good that they could not do individually.
What do you think the purpose of government is?
Right now at the top of Fox News:bearister said:
When the Fox News reporters in the correspondent pool try to engage in a battle of wits with her, they will find themselves woefully unarmed....but once Hannity's and Bow Tie Boy's editors finish manipulating the video, it will look like a Fox News' Gotcha! every night on their respective shows.
The Fox troops have to accept the reality that trying to exact payback by asking questions of Team Biden so that they look as dishonest, idiotic and incompetent as tRump and his F Troop, just isn't going to happen. That horrifying, surreal situation was hopefully a one and done in the history of our Republic.
In their petty minds Trump's impeachment was like kindergarten bullying and now they want to do it too, instead of an investigation into major crimes against the nation that required a response and for which there was no other recourse.bearister said:
Senate Republican threatens impeachments of past Democratic presidents
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/23/senate-republican-john-cornyn-impeachment-trump-past-democratic-presidents?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
*Go ahead, John, impeach the ex Democratic presidents. They'll be waiting.
This is all part and parcel of tRumpists wanting to attack Biden on a daily basis like tRump was attacked. The problem is that tRump is a career criminal and no one could even keep up trying to comment on his serial malfeasance. Fox News will be stuck with Biden's suit colors and whether he forgot to pick up his dog's turf on the White House lawn.
Democrats Suck said:Apparently, you thought after he got elected, people weren't going to point out all the things he said he'd do that he didn't do.sycasey said:
Biden has been President for a week and already people are starting Twitter threads about how many things he's failed to do yet. This seems disingenuous.
You're disingenuous.
I don't think you know what the word 'disingenuous' is, perhaps it is because you are a foreign troll farmer?Democrats Suck said:Apparently, you thought after he got elected, people weren't going to point out all the things he said he'd do that he didn't do.sycasey said:
Biden has been President for a week and already people are starting Twitter threads about how many things he's failed to do yet. This seems disingenuous.
You're disingenuous.
AunBear89 said:
No. He's just not-very-bright YogiHydra.
Democrats Suck said:Apparently, you thought after he got elected, people weren't going to point out all the things he said he'd do that he didn't do.sycasey said:
Biden has been President for a week and already people are starting Twitter threads about how many things he's failed to do yet. This seems disingenuous.
You're disingenuous.
sycasey said:
Biden has been President for a week and already people are starting Twitter threads about how many things he's failed to do yet. This seems disingenuous.