Official Biden / Harris Administration Thread

180,735 Views | 2459 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by movielover
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.


Obama sounded OK to many, it was his radical policies and implementation.
Correct, that attack didn't work on Obama either.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Are you saying that he is a radical leftist but just doesn't look and speak like one?
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, he's saying you clowns are gobbling up what your far right disinformation bubble spoon feeds you.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Obama sounded OK to many, it was his radical policies and implementation.
Correct, that attack didn't work on Obama either.
Thanks to Obama, a DC outsider like Trump came along and shocked the Democrats to become president.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

No, he's saying you clowns are gobbling up what your far right disinformation bubble spoon feeds you.
I'm open to gobbling up what your "moderate" information bubble spoon feeds you. Let me know when you figure things out.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Obama sounded OK to many, it was his radical policies and implementation.
Correct, that attack didn't work on Obama either.
Thanks to Obama, a DC outsider like Trump came along and shocked the Democrats to become president.
If Obama had been able to run again, he would have absolutely clobbered Trump. That was a Hillary problem.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Obama sounded OK to many, it was his radical policies and implementation.
Correct, that attack didn't work on Obama either.
Thanks to Obama, a DC outsider like Trump came along and shocked the Democrats to become president.
If Obama had been able to run again, he would have absolutely clobbered Trump. That was a Hillary problem.
Do you really think so? Obama had millions of less votes in his second run despite the population increase. The opposite was true for Trump.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Obama sounded OK to many, it was his radical policies and implementation.
Correct, that attack didn't work on Obama either.
Thanks to Obama, a DC outsider like Trump came along and shocked the Democrats to become president.
If Obama had been able to run again, he would have absolutely clobbered Trump. That was a Hillary problem.
Do you really think so?
Yes, absolutely. Why do you think Michelle Obama constantly polls so well as a potential nominee, even though she has never wanted to run for office? Because people would like to have Obama back.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

bearister said:


I think Walz is going to play young Warren Buffet when his political career is over.
Weird choice. Thought Shapiro would be more helpful in PA and more of a moderate.
The Harris campaign picked someone far left? Weird.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Are you saying that he is a radical leftist but just doesn't look and speak like one?
No, he's basically just a liberal Democrat who speaks like one.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
HE WILL UNLEASH HELL ON EARTH!
Not unless the Americans can stop him first.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Obama sounded OK to many, it was his radical policies and implementation.
Correct, that attack didn't work on Obama either.
Thanks to Obama, a DC outsider like Trump came along and shocked the Democrats to become president.
If Obama had been able to run again, he would have absolutely clobbered Trump. That was a Hillary problem.
Do you really think so?
Yes, absolutely. Why do you think Michelle Obama constantly polls so well as a potential nominee, even though she has never wanted to run for office? Because people would like to have Obama back.
The Democrats would like Obama back and in some ways he hasn't left DC. But there's no indication that Michelle would have defeated much less, "clobbered' Trump based on Obama's declining popularity compared to his first term.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Looks like Harris VP pick Waltz:

- broke his 6-year military commitment
- failed to complete officer training
- QUIT BEFORE HIS BATALLION WENT TO IRAQ
- lied about the above facts



This that sort of swift-boats-for-truth bs that they laid on John Kerry's military service. Unfortunately, they kept saying it until some people who were on the fence might have almost believed it.

Walz is a great choice: very well-spoken with a solid resume. Very qualified to be President, IMO. Of course, if they lose the election because they narrowly lost Pennsylvania, there will be a lot of what-might-have-been.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Obama sounded OK to many, it was his radical policies and implementation.
Correct, that attack didn't work on Obama either.
Thanks to Obama, a DC outsider like Trump came along and shocked the Democrats to become president.
If Obama had been able to run again, he would have absolutely clobbered Trump. That was a Hillary problem.
Do you really think so?
Yes, absolutely. Why do you think Michelle Obama constantly polls so well as a potential nominee, even though she has never wanted to run for office? Because people would like to have Obama back.
The Democrats would like Obama back and in some ways he hasn't left DC. But there's no indication that Michelle would have defeated much less, "clobbered' Trump based on Obama's declining popularity compared to his first term.
I can't prove something that will never happen, so you go on believing what you want.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Obama sounded OK to many, it was his radical policies and implementation.
Correct, that attack didn't work on Obama either.
Thanks to Obama, a DC outsider like Trump came along and shocked the Democrats to become president.
If Obama had been able to run again, he would have absolutely clobbered Trump. That was a Hillary problem.
Do you really think so?
Yes, absolutely. Why do you think Michelle Obama constantly polls so well as a potential nominee, even though she has never wanted to run for office? Because people would like to have Obama back.
The Democrats would like Obama back and in some ways he hasn't left DC. But there's no indication that Michelle would have defeated much less, "clobbered' Trump based on Obama's declining popularity compared to his first term.
I can't prove something that will never happen, so you go on believing what you want.


I'm responding to Idiot Bot above.
If trump has declining popularity then why are the polls a dead heat? Why are the GOP politicians behind him en masse?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Obama sounded OK to many, it was his radical policies and implementation.
Correct, that attack didn't work on Obama either.
Thanks to Obama, a DC outsider like Trump came along and shocked the Democrats to become president.
If Obama had been able to run again, he would have absolutely clobbered Trump. That was a Hillary problem.
Do you really think so? Obama had millions of less votes in his second run despite the population increase. The opposite was true for Trump.


The novelty of voting for a half black president wore off, and he started playing the Race Card. No bueno.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What is the official reason the Democrats dumped Joe Biden? He received the most votes in history in any presidential election and recently won his primary without contest.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Balls to the Walz said:

sycasey said:


Why do you think Michelle Obama constantly polls so well as a potential nominee, even though she has never wanted to run for office?
Because Democrats are ****ing stupid, that's why. They want spokespeople that make them feel good without knowing how people would govern. It's why there's so many liberal morons who love Pete Buttigieg, not because they support his agenda whatever it is, but because of his soundbites on Fox News.


What hard job has Michelle succeeded at? Her hospital job appears to have been a political payback pretend job which a doctor assumed when she departed.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

What is the official reason the Democrats dumped Joe Biden? He received the most votes in history in any presidential election and recently won his primary without contest.

Why even ask this question?

1. There is no such thing as an "official reason".
2. We all know it was because he was aging rapidly and it's a four-year job.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

bear2034 said:

What is the official reason the Democrats dumped Joe Biden? He received the most votes in history in any presidential election and recently won his primary without contest.

Why even ask this question?

1. There is no such thing as an "official reason".
2. We all know it was because he was aging rapidly and it's a four-year job.

If that was the case why did they hold a primary election with Joe Biden's name on the ballot?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.

Radical leftist = Progressive
Illegal immigrants = Migrants
Riots = Mostly peaceful protests
George Floyd = Hero
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hearing the "LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!" cheer against tRump at the Philly Harris/Walz rally just now….


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Big C said:

bear2034 said:

What is the official reason the Democrats dumped Joe Biden? He received the most votes in history in any presidential election and recently won his primary without contest.

Why even ask this question?

1. There is no such thing as an "official reason".
2. We all know it was because he was aging rapidly and it's a four-year job.

If that was the case why did they hold a primary election with Joe Biden's name on the ballot?

I have answered this question honestly and you know damn well why. Pro tip: You people should be concentrating on the next few months, not the past few. (I wouldn't be giving out valuable advice like this -- at least not for free -- if I thought I had a VIP audience.)
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Hearing the "LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!" cheer against tRump at the Philly Harris/Walz rally just now….
Lock him up cheers sound so hollow after the failed assassination attempt.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

bear2034 said:

Big C said:

bear2034 said:

What is the official reason the Democrats dumped Joe Biden? He received the most votes in history in any presidential election and recently won his primary without contest.

Why even ask this question?

1. There is no such thing as an "official reason".
2. We all know it was because he was aging rapidly and it's a four-year job.

If that was the case why did they hold a primary election with Joe Biden's name on the ballot?

I have answered this question honestly and you know damn well why. Pro tip: You people should be concentrating on the next few months, not the past few. (I wouldn't be giving out valuable advice like this -- at least not for free -- if I thought I had a VIP audience.)

I know you know. They know we know. But are they pretending that we don't know?
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:


Why not Bernie?

"Just win, baby."
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harris had some quality Marxists to choose from, but the radical quitter won her over with this little theme song:

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paul Sperry: "Since Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is officially being reported as a favorite to become the VP pick for Kamala Harris.

"Here he is pictured from his DUI arrest where he was going 96 in a 55. [Picture on Fakebook.] He then lied to police about being deaf in an attempt to avoid his arrest."

Another documented lie.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?




Conservatives can't do humor.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:





Conservatives can't do humor.
Ba dum tss.
"Just win, baby."
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:


Well, that settles it, I guess we may as well pre-print the ballots for:

Biden
Harris


"Just win, baby."
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

sycasey said:

When people look at Walz and hear him speak, I don't think the "radical leftist" attack is going to stick.
Obama sounded OK to many, it was his radical policies and implementation.
Correct, that attack didn't work on Obama either.
Thanks to Obama, a DC outsider like Trump came along and shocked the Democrats to become president.
If Obama had been able to run again, he would have absolutely clobbered Trump. That was a Hillary problem.
Do you really think so?
Yes, absolutely. Why do you think Michelle Obama constantly polls so well as a potential nominee, even though she has never wanted to run for office? Because people would like to have Obama back.
The Democrats would like Obama back and in some ways he hasn't left DC. But there's no indication that Michelle would have defeated much less, "clobbered' Trump based on Obama's declining popularity compared to his first term.
Actually, Obama's popularity climbed steadily his last 3 years in office and by the time he left the Presidency, it was higher than at any point after his first year in office. In January 2017, Obama was about 10 points ahead of Trump's best popularity poll rating.

It's hard to read because recent presidents are being compared to Biden
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never fear, after the ruling on presidential immunity, overturning the Election will be a nothing burger for the SCOTUS, especially since they did it before.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Never fear, after the ruling on presidential immunity, overturning the Election will be a nothing burger for the SCOTUS, especially since they did it before.
Russia, Russia, Russia. So many insisted it was true. All those CIA wonks lost their clearance, though, of course. Right?
"Just win, baby."
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.