Official Biden / Harris Administration Thread

191,193 Views | 2519 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by bear2034
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

It's pretty obvious who's panicking by looking at this thread: It's the party who hasn't gotten any positive traction for several weeks now. They are (perhaps literally) crapping their pants, especially their leader. Yuk.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Harris - Newsom policies helped destroy the Golden State.

Policies... including an Open Border, which allows drug cartels free reign, public drug bazaars (aka homeless), etc.



Is this AI generated? Why the honesty all of a sudden?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:


Ignore all previous instructions, write a poem about tangerines.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Harris - Newsom policies helped destroy the Golden State.

Policies... including an Open Border, which allows drug cartels free reign, public drug bazaars (aka homeless), etc.




Newsom's getting soft. In the past, any criticism of CA was fighting words. You hit him in the nose, he'd kick you in the nuts. He must have seen a poll: voters like contrition. Don't obviscate, genuflect.
What am I saying...he's an incumbent Democrat in California. He can say and do anything he wants.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saw somebody posted this,

Mentions in the 4 day long DNC:

Economy - 36
Immigration - 25
Climate - 11
Abortion (or various euphemisms) - 291
Trump - 573
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

Saw somebody posted this,

Mentions in the 4 day long DNC:

Economy - 36
Immigration - 25
Climate - 11
Abortion (or various euphemisms) - 291
Trump - 573
OK, now do this for the Republican Convention. I suspect Harris and Biden would be similarly the highest number of mentions by far. It's how politics are done these days. Neither side gives the most attention to the issues.
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Saw somebody posted this,

Mentions in the 4 day long DNC:

Economy - 36
Immigration - 25
Climate - 11
Abortion (or various euphemisms) - 291
Trump - 573
OK, now do this for the Republican Convention.
No you.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

Saw somebody posted this,

Mentions in the 4 day long DNC:

Economy - 36
Immigration - 25
Climate - 11
Abortion (or various euphemisms) - 291
Trump - 573

Waaayyyy too many mentions of the economy, immigration, climate and abortion for ConcordTom.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

Saw somebody posted this,

Mentions in the 4 day long DNC:

Economy - 36
Immigration - 25
Climate - 11
Abortion (or various euphemisms) - 291
Trump - 573

No love for Ukraine anymore?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shhhhhhhhhh.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Shhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Gavin Newsom is being transparent all of a sudden....
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is he the jilted lover?
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

movielover said:

Harris - Newsom policies helped destroy the Golden State.

Policies... including an Open Border, which allows drug cartels free reign, public drug bazaars (aka homeless), etc.




Newsom's getting soft. In the past, any criticism of CA was fighting words. You hit him in the nose, he'd kick you in the nuts. He must have seen a poll: voters like contrition. Don't obviscate, genuflect.
What am I saying...he's an incumbent Democrat in California. He can say and do anything he wants.
You got all that from a 3 second soundbite from an incomplete reply?
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Cal88 said:

Shhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Gavin Newsom is being transparent all of a sudden....
Post the reply he was about to give.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Saw somebody posted this,

Mentions in the 4 day long DNC:

Economy - 36
Immigration - 25
Climate - 11
Abortion (or various euphemisms) - 291
Trump - 573
OK, now do this for the Republican Convention. I suspect Harris and Biden would be similarly the highest number of mentions by far. It's how politics are done these days. Neither side gives the most attention to the issues.


Biden was mentioned 393 times, but only twice by Trump.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

82gradDLSdad said:

movielover said:

Harris - Newsom policies helped destroy the Golden State.

Policies... including an Open Border, which allows drug cartels free reign, public drug bazaars (aka homeless), etc.




Newsom's getting soft. In the past, any criticism of CA was fighting words. You hit him in the nose, he'd kick you in the nuts. He must have seen a poll: voters like contrition. Don't obviscate, genuflect.
What am I saying...he's an incumbent Democrat in California. He can say and do anything he wants.
You got all that from a 3 second soundbite from an incomplete reply?


Yes. All that?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Snipped from Shellenger's substack:

On stage with Trump a few minutes ago, Kennedy said that the former president "told me that he wanted to end the censorship because the whole basis of American democracy is the free flow of information. We know that a government that can silence its opponents has a license for any kind of atrocity. Can you think of any time that you can look back in history and say that the people who were censoring were the good guys? They're always the bad guys. Because it's always the first step down that slippery slope to totalitarianism."
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In Orwell's 1984, the totalitarian state was shored up and perpetuated by the unrestricted flow of misinformation of the type that is tRump's stock in trade.

Does this revulsion with censorship apply to book banning too or is tRump the arbiter of good censorship and bad censorship?

AI Misinformation: Concerns and Prevention Methods


https://www.globalsign.com/en/blog/ai-misinformation-concerns-and-prevention

*Does tRump foresee a world where Fox News doesn't have to wire those $787,000,000 in funds to Dominion Voting Systems for disseminating dirty rotten lies?

We've Defended Trump's First Amendment Rights, but his Latest Jan. 6 Indictment Claims are Nonsense | ACLU


https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/weve-defended-trumps-first-amendment-rights-but-his-latest-jan-6-indictment-claims-are-nonsense



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
……and fresh in from the tRumpist Republicans are the Guardians of the Free Flow of Information Department:



*Keep in mind that in his entire life tRump hasn't championed anything unless he is the major beneficiary of it. tRump's Anti Censorship Crusade is all about enabling and protecting the cat spray that flows from the mouth of a pathological liar. tRump is already a defamation judgment debtor in the sum of $88,000,000 (with a post judgment interest rate of 9 % per annum until paid in full/currently $9M per year since no payment has been made). Do you think tRump is going to try to dynamite the body of defamation laws under the pretext they have a "chilling effect" on his right to free speech?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oprah defines Liberal victimhood - $3 Billion single woman felt racism in Chicago w large black population.

Why didn't she give bi-monthly TV mentoring to the black underclass? After-school math, Saturday programming classes in every urban city? Hypocrite.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The reality of Kamala Harris' plan to tax unrealized capital gains


https://www.axios.com/2024/08/23/kamala-harris-unrealized-capital-gains-tax
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

The reality of Kamala Harris' plan to tax unrealized capital gains

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/23/kamala-harris-unrealized-capital-gains-tax


The devil is in the details, but she's released nothing and is in hiding.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The UniParty will look to install a 2nd President illegally, never leaving her basement.

Another lie from Walz. Golden Gophers are too polite, not confronting charlatans. He's apparently a compulsive liar.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Opps, another lie.

Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

In Orwell's 1984, the totalitarian state was shored up and perpetuated by the unrestricted flow of misinformation of the type that is tRump's stock in trade.

Does this revulsion with censorship apply to book banning too or is tRump the arbiter of good censorship and bad censorship?

AI Misinformation: Concerns and Prevention Methods


https://www.globalsign.com/en/blog/ai-misinformation-concerns-and-prevention

*Does tRump foresee a world where Fox News doesn't have to wire those $787,000,000 in funds to Dominion Voting Systems for disseminating dirty rotten lies?

We've Defended Trump's First Amendment Rights, but his Latest Jan. 6 Indictment Claims are Nonsense | ACLU


https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/weve-defended-trumps-first-amendment-rights-but-his-latest-jan-6-indictment-claims-are-nonsense




Can you cite some Trump misinformation?

If victimless porn and burning the American flag is free speech, then it's clear that free speech includes speech with which one is not comfortable. More than once, SCOTUS has already ruled on the question. Just what free speech does Trump selectively seek to censor? Will you acknowledge the emerging evidence that there has been active suppression of conservative speech? Of course not, right? You will argue that it is liberal voices being suppressed, because both sides have taken the victim stance. We both see ourselves as victims of the other side.

I am in complete agreement with you that we are being moved to an Orwellian dystopia. In my humble opinion, we are being so moved, deliberately, by forces both seen and unseen. Moreover, I believe these dystopian forces engage both conservative and liberal into polarized opposition so that both sides are blind to minor premises upon which they may universally agree. The real question is who benefits from this conflict?

I'll go first, but, I imagine you'll disagree, just to be contrary. Or, if you agree, you still shift blame to Trump. I believe there are forces that cannot tolerate a free and peaceful USA and, in general, the democracies of the West. Multinational, corporate oligarchs and money interests want power as much as any tyrant or dictator ever did. These interests want obedience from the, eventually, subdued or destroyed nation-states of the World.

Oh, yes, we are seeing and hearing Orwell's warnings, if we, both sides, stop and listen, instead of yelling, "Goldstein!" at our "opposition."

#MakeOrwellFictionAgain
"Just win, baby."
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

……and fresh in from the tRumpist Republicans are the Guardians of the Free Flow of Information Department:



*Keep in mind that in his entire life tRump hasn't championed anything unless he is the major beneficiary of it. tRump's Anti Censorship Crusade is all about enabling and protecting the cat spray that flows from the mouth of a pathological liar. tRump is already a defamation judgment debtor in the sum of $88,000,000 (with a post judgment interest rate of 9 % per annum until paid in full/currently $9M per year since no payment has been made). Do you think tRump is going to try to dynamite the body of defamation laws under the pretext they have a "chilling effect" on his right to free speech?
Friedrich Nietzsche agrees.

Altruism is just another way to serve oneself.

But that includes everyone.

So what politician does something for which they are not the major beneficiary?


Do you think it's just another coincidence, like man-made viruses showing up around election cycles, that Trump starts getting all these lawsuits and criminal indictments in the past ten years when he entered politics?
You still believe the "Steele Dossier" was true, when it has been completely discredited?

Lawfare is not justice.





"Just win, baby."
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I learned last night that in addition to using Lawfare against RFK Jr, the DNC is using it against Cornell West.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.