+1000!!!Unit2Sucks said:
I am so happy to hear that I'm still young. As are my senior citizen parents who used to be republican when the Republican Party was the smart party.
GBear4Life said:
more white supremacist logical fallacies from morons on twitter...are these the people you follow?
GBear4Life said:
Polls showed Shilary would win handily too. Biden leads all other Dem candidates.
Polls matter and can be wrong, like many things in life. But that's not really the point. The point is Biden leads. That means that, right now, he is the leading candidate. And that, I'd argue, is not great for Dems.sycasey said:GBear4Life said:
Polls showed Shilary would win handily too. Biden leads all other Dem candidates.
So do polls matter or not? Can't be both.
GBear4Life said:Polls matter and can be wrong, like many things in life. But that's not really the point. The point is Biden leads. That means that, right now, he is the leading candidate. And that, I'd argue, is not great for Dems.sycasey said:GBear4Life said:
Polls showed Shilary would win handily too. Biden leads all other Dem candidates.
So do polls matter or not? Can't be both.
GBear4Life said:Polls matter and can be wrong, like many things in life. But that's not really the point. The point is Biden leads. That means that, right now, he is the leading candidate. And that, I'd argue, is not great for Dems.sycasey said:GBear4Life said:
Polls showed Shilary would win handily too. Biden leads all other Dem candidates.
So do polls matter or not? Can't be both.
Agreed. Bowing to an irrational mob has far reaching consequences.bearister said:
Joe Biden Refuses To Apologize For Comments On Segregationists
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5d0adccfe4b09f5a54b5e266/amp
I'm glad Joe has gotten tRumpian with regard to refusing to apologize. Once you start apologizing to the Progressives, they will be nipping at your heels until they run you out of town.
Name for me a Democratic candidate who, if they were leading, you would come on here and say that is good for Dems.GBear4Life said:Polls matter and can be wrong, like many things in life. But that's not really the point. The point is Biden leads. That means that, right now, he is the leading candidate. And that, I'd argue, is not great for Dems.sycasey said:GBear4Life said:
Polls showed Shilary would win handily too. Biden leads all other Dem candidates.
So do polls matter or not? Can't be both.
The socialist would be good for Dems?GBear4Life said:
Bernie Sanders
I saw his comments on this. He didn't "predict" that it would happen. He said it was plausible.bearister said:
"Cook Political Report's Dave Wasserman predicts Democrats flip Michigan and Pennsylvania, increase their stronghold in California, and narrow the loss in Texas helping Dems win the popular vote by nearly 5 million votes.
But Trump narrowly holds onto Arizona, Florida, North Carolina and Wisconsin which Democrats are gunning for and keeps the White House.
Jim Messina, President Obama's 2012 campaign manager, predicted the race will come down to two or three states:
Anarchistbear said:
2016 election
Didn't vote- 48%
Trump- 26%
Clinton 26%
Trump's popularity is the same as it was four years ago. Rather than expand his base he has marginally shrunk it.
It's the Democrats to lose just like in 2016.
Elections are about the future.
He'd have a better shot at winning the general election is what I mean. Along with Warren, though I think Warren will come off as smug and elitist to centrists living in middle america more so than Bernie.dajo9 said:The socialist would be good for Dems?GBear4Life said:
Bernie Sanders