GBear4Life said:
BI two weeks ago on Corona: What's the big dea
It was funny before?bearister said:
The sick joke of Donald Trump's presidency isn't funny any more
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/13/coronavirus-donald-trump-presidency-sick-joke?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
B.A. Bearacus said:
Studies in just winging it.
Everybody is looking to reduce their legal liabilitydimitrig said:
Skiing doesn't seem like a particularly risky way to spread the virus. I wouldn't stay at a ski lodge. That's a different story. However, skiing itself seems pretty innocuous. Skiers aren't generally in close quarters with each other and they are usually covered up pretty well. It seems like one of the least likely sports to be an issue. What is the concern there, really?
dimitrig said:
Skiing doesn't seem like a particularly risky way to spread the virus. I wouldn't stay at a ski lodge. That's a different story. However, skiing itself seems pretty innocuous. Skiers aren't generally in close quarters with each other and they are usually covered up pretty well. It seems like one of the least likely sports to be an issue. What is the concern there, really?
sycasey said:dimitrig said:
Skiing doesn't seem like a particularly risky way to spread the virus. I wouldn't stay at a ski lodge. That's a different story. However, skiing itself seems pretty innocuous. Skiers aren't generally in close quarters with each other and they are usually covered up pretty well. It seems like one of the least likely sports to be an issue. What is the concern there, really?
It's still a bunch of people congregating in a single area, though. And wouldn't people then hang out in the indoor areas while resting, getting food, etc.? I imagine people aren't just skiing the whole time.
sycasey said:
Anyway, a bit of good news: Trump seems to have agreed to a relief bill negotiated with House Dems, and McConnell called off the Senate recess so they can vote on it. Not completely paralyzed at least.
B.A. Bearacus said:
I wouldn't hire that copywriter or that president.
Unit2Sucks said:
If it's true that Trump wanted to keep a potential vaccine exclusive to the US, which I have no reason to disbelieve and is entirely consistent with everything Trump has done and said in his life, is pathetic. I'm all for incentivizing private industry to develop vaccines and cures, but something like this is so important and widespread that it needs to be made available to the world. Anything less than that is a massive failure and inhumane.
Is there anyone who would defend this behavior?
Not only inhumane, but completely stupid on a practical level. You want this disease to be eradicated in as many places as possible, lest it come back here.Unit2Sucks said:
If it's true that Trump wanted to keep a potential vaccine exclusive to the US, which I have no reason to disbelieve and is entirely consistent with everything Trump has done and said in his life, is pathetic. I'm all for incentivizing private industry to develop vaccines and cures, but something like this is so important and widespread that it needs to be made available to the world. Anything less than that is a massive failure and inhumane.
Is there anyone who would defend this behavior?
sycasey said:Not only inhumane, but completely stupid on a practical level. You want this disease to be eradicated in as many places as possible, lest it come back here.Unit2Sucks said:
If it's true that Trump wanted to keep a potential vaccine exclusive to the US, which I have no reason to disbelieve and is entirely consistent with everything Trump has done and said in his life, is pathetic. I'm all for incentivizing private industry to develop vaccines and cures, but something like this is so important and widespread that it needs to be made available to the world. Anything less than that is a massive failure and inhumane.
Is there anyone who would defend this behavior?