LOL liberalsdajo9 said:YouGBear4Life said:
what are "RWNJs" ?
https://www.acronymfinder.com/Right-Wing-Nut-Job-(RWNJ).htmlGBear4Life said:
what are "RWNJs" ?
oski003 said:
On what basis is Barr to be cross examined by attorneys?
dajo9 said:oski003 said:
On what basis is Barr to be cross examined by attorneys?
The basis that Congress wants to. Having staffers question people used to be the norm until video entered Congress and they wanted the face time for themselves.
Did Barr perjure himself when he previously testified to Congress under oath. This would involve all correspondence sent to Barr by Mueller, his review of the evidence that Mueller included with the 443 page report, and a complete and unredacted copy of the Special Prosecutor's Report. Maybe it could also include questions concerning, did anyone at the White House suggest he conduct investigations? Maybe it would look like the Republican's did during the Kavanaugh hearings.oski003 said:
On what basis is Barr to be cross examined by attorneys?
Another Bear said:
bearister said:
Sen. Harris: "Has the president or anyone at the White House ever asked or suggested that you open an investigation of anyone?"
I would have phrased it: "Has the president or anyone at the White House ever mentioned the topic of you opening an investigation of anyone?"
It was very Bill Clinton-esque. Truth isn't truth.Unit2Sucks said:bearister said:
Sen. Harris: "Has the president or anyone at the White House ever asked or suggested that you open an investigation of anyone?"
I would have phrased it: "Has the president or anyone at the White House ever mentioned the topic of you opening an investigation of anyone?"
Nice try but Barr would have said he wasn't sure what you mean by "mentioned". Talk about a guy who lacks candor.
Another Bear said:
Okay then, the Dems grew a pair or they'll just whipped it and are ready to slap some faces with it. Screw Barr...go right to Mueller. Mueller won't stonewall or play word games. Now it looks like Mueller Time is really coming.
ducky23 said:Another Bear said:
Okay then, the Dems grew a pair or they'll just whipped it and are ready to slap some faces with it. Screw Barr...go right to Mueller. Mueller won't stonewall or play word games. Now it looks like Mueller Time is really coming.
I don't know man. I think in private, mueller is probably fuming about Barr. But he's such an institutionalist, I just can't see him ripping the sitting attorney general or the sitting president.
Hope I'm wrong
I agree about the institutionalist stuff, and he's very reserved. It's a shame we won't see the junior senator from California question the special counsel given this will be the House Judiciary Comm. She's exceptionally good and she'd get the answers, while giving Mueller some room and some set-ups. Nadler is okay, maybe Lieu and Swalwell can pick it up.ducky23 said:Another Bear said:
Okay then, the Dems grew a pair or they'll just whipped it and are ready to slap some faces with it. Screw Barr...go right to Mueller. Mueller won't stonewall or play word games. Now it looks like Mueller Time is really coming.
I don't know man. I think in private, mueller is probably fuming about Barr. But he's such an institutionalist, I just can't see him ripping the sitting attorney general or the sitting president.
Hope I'm wrong
Another Bear said:
Quote:
Opinion: Think the Attorney General's testimony this week was frustrating? Just try discussing Moby Dick with him.
Quote:
Blumenthal pointed out that Mueller's letter did not once mention the press. I knew exactly how Blumenthal must have felt because that's just how I felt when the Attorney General sat in Cathy's living room last May and insisted that Herman Melville's Moby Dick or, The Whale was the story of a "very stable genius of a sea captain's ultimately self-actualizing quest to befriend a puffin name Kevin."
"Kevin? What document did he even read?" I'd whispered to Lisa in the kitchen, and not for the first time. This guy seems to have some very particular reading comprehension issues, is all I'm saying.
